Originally posted by :Meenal Bahadur | ||
" |
For which problem is she undergoing treatment.Please tell us the name of exact illness.Then something more appropriate can be opined. |
" |
????????????????
Originally posted by :Meenal Bahadur | ||
" |
For which problem is she undergoing treatment.Please tell us the name of exact illness.Then something more appropriate can be opined. |
" |
????????????????
subramanian (retired) 20 February 2011
Thanks Meenal Bahadur. This is good. The person who initiated the thread, may please give full details, as to what the Psychiatrist diagnosed, so that such of those members who have knowledge on the subject, can give their suggestions.
Originally posted by :subramanian | ||
" |
Thanks Meenal Bahadur. This is good. The person who initiated the thread, may please give full details, as to what the Psychiatrist diagnosed, so that such of those members who have knowledge on the subject, can give their suggestions. |
" |
You created this thread.
The starter of this thread is retd. and so are you- PROOF No. 1
Ever since you joined LCI,you are only participating in this thread,and no where else.-PROOF No. 2
Don't worry.Even if you admit you are the thread starter no one will make fun of you.Not even me...Promise!
So make the reveleation finally.
Otherwise no advocate would like to advice such a thread starter who has simply run away.
Now you decide
subramanian (retired) 21 February 2011
In Yahoo groups or Google groups, members always address only the issues and not the persons. First time in my 10 years of net experience, i see a member attackine another member with wild allegations based on surmises and imaginations. It leads one to believe that she is perhaps the torturing wife referred to in the original posting, appearing in a disguised name. Oh God, give her patience and peace of mind. May God save the tortured husband.
Mayank (Senior Manager ) 21 February 2011
. I have happend to see this thread becuase it is the second topmost in the list and it is hilarious, how the issue has become hidden in guessing who is who.
The proof Meenal has given for your ID are so vague. There are hundreds and thoudands of retired persons around. And whytwo retired persons cannot be on the same thread wihout being the same person
Second proof that a person appears only in one thread is not a proof , it is just a guess. Guess work cannot be termed as a proof. There is all the possibility that Mr. Subraman is interested in only this thread for the reason best known to him and he need not reveal it . It is immetarial for anyoine to know why is he interested in this particular thread.
I agree with you Mr. Subramanian when you say the main point here is issue and not the persons. However, I do not go with you when you pay her in her coin. : how can you say she is the tortured wife? She may not be a wife at all, leave alone tortured.
It is better to keep sanctity of a thread and talk around issues rather than guessing who is who on the list of over 100000 members of LCI.
subramanian (retired) 21 February 2011
Mr. Mayank.
My sincere apologies for paying Meenal Bahadur in her own coin. Sorry pl. I should have simply ignored her.
Originally posted by :Mayank | ||
" |
. I have happend to see this thread becuase it is the second topmost in the list and it is hilarious, how the issue has become hidden in guessing who is who. The proof Meenal has given for your ID are so vague. There are hundreds and thoudands of retired persons around. And whytwo retired persons cannot be on the same thread wihout being the same person Second proof that a person appears only in one thread is not a proof , it is just a guess. Guess work cannot be termed as a proof. There is all the possibility that Mr. Subraman is interested in only this thread for the reason best known to him and he need not reveal it . It is immetarial for anyoine to know why is he interested in this particular thread. I agree with you Mr. Subramanian when you say the main point here is issue and not the persons. However, I do not go with you when you pay her in her coin. : how can you say she is the tortured wife? She may not be a wife at all, leave alone tortured. It is better to keep sanctity of a thread and talk around issues rather than guessing who is who on the list of over 100000 members of LCI. |
" |
Here comes another comedian
Comedians like you who create a new ID just to show Meenal down,first by their old ID "What's in a name" and now with another ID,Mayank make this thread hilarious.
I am sure you have other IDs in LCI also with the genders of he and she.And you are definately a she.
If you have any common sense,you should have read the replies given by me and Tajobs,regarding how to handle this situation.Advices have been given long back.there's nothing better that can be advised.Otherwise the query could be reposted in experts section,to get advice only by legal experts.
But this "gentle" man doesn't want to understand,and keeps dragging the attention of all people to this thread,so that it remains on top,accompanied by a foolish supporter ,who logs in using different IDs,latest one being Mayank.
But neither this "gentleman" nor you,ie,Mayank(a lady in fact) are satisfied with the answers.
Hence the above gentleman keeps asking the same question repeatedly.
If he is not the query seeker also,then also he's too much interested in this thread,while the main asker has gone away long time back.
Hence this thread is becoming hilarious because of you two.
@"honourable" Mayank/what's in a name.
For your mental health it's better to divert your mind into other constructive things,instead of following what I write.I told you the other day also,after giving you a good dosage.
But you don't understand and keep coming with new IDs
You may be able to fool others that you are a new person,not me.
Mayank (Senior Manager ) 21 February 2011
A forensic lab right here, no need to go elsewhere.
It's a good thread after all if not for anything else than for its hilarity.
On a more sober note: nothing was personally referred. Only it was explained that two retired persons can come on the same thread without being the same retired person.
Can anyone find anything of the nature of personal in it?
Or can anyone find the suggestion not to pay in the same coin at fault?
Rest of the matter I ignore and leave it to the larger public, including the legal fraternity, who come to read this thread.