Hi to every one,I need a urgent advice from the experts regarding my writ petition which is coming for hearing in the next week.
Brief facts of writ petition - Iam a manager in a public sector bank.A departmental enquiry has been conducted against me stating that i derived undue pecuniary gain.In the enquiry the Enquiry officer has himself presented the case and evidences as the presenting officer is unable to present any evidence whats ever.The enquiry officer has himself wtitten his report that presenting officer has failed to present the case and stated that charges are only partly proved .Based on the report the disciplinary authority has proposed only 1 increment down and sought the CVO advice.At that time there is no permanent CVO in the organization.Instead of CVO the Disciplinary Cell,H.O has modified the punishment to removal and forced the Disciplinary Authority to adhere to removal decision.With the continous pressure the D.A has given removal from service order.Not happy with the decision i prefered an appeal covering all the wrong tactics obtained by the E.O.The appellate authority has sought the observations of D.A.The D.A has conveyed to A.A no charge has been established in the enquiry and Enquiry is not done properly so told to reinstate me into the service immediately.The A.A has ignored his observations and continued the Removal from service decision.
I have obtained all the records and correspondance of the case through RTI and filed a writ petition in the high court.The court has asked the bank to file counter affidavit.The Bank in their counter affidavit stated that Since the Disciplinary authority has retired, another person will be the respondent as Disciplinary Authority,In their counter affidavit the present D.A is stating that he has not given any observation on appeal nor sought any CVO advice ignoring the earlier D.A 's records.
My question is whether do one case can have two Disciplinary Authorities?
Can he ignore and sideline the Earlier D.A's statements and records and impart new notions and points which are not present in the charge sheet and also in the records of the case?
I have obtained all the records of the case which are crucial evidence of wrong doings of the bank through RTI from the last two years runiing from pillar to post.Now do they have any value in court?
Please advice me in this so i can argue in the court and also any additional advice is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.