Eralier there was certain case state of haryana Vs Piara Singh, Workmeen case, Jaccob M Purumpathil case, etc etc which has stAted that
" If an employee has been working satisfactorily for fairly long spell, then the authorities must consider his case for regularisation provided that his service record is satisfactorily and his appointment doesn't counter to the reservation rules"
With the passing of latest case by Uma devi which has gone aginst the interest of employee and now cannot claim regularisation
Now my question is there are many hundred of employees who had been working for several years more than 10-15 years and all of them is now age barred.
If the employer wants to evict them they can discharged them at any stage . These employees had their families and children which are dependent exclusively on them where they will go?
Its not the fault of the employee only as the purpose of the adhoc employee is meant for the exigencies of the services which may be for some months to 1-2 year but once they had been retained in the services for more than 10 years. Don't think that there is fault on the employer too who has exploited the situation and let the employees to continue for several years and lastly evade up by saying that thei appointments were illegal
Kindly suggest the remedy for an employee?
whether approaching before supreme court by the way of writ petition will solve the riddle as lowe courts High , CAT will not listen to the grievances as precedent of the UMA DEVI is binding on them
