In Punjab and Haryana High Court:
25/03/2013 : Anticpatory Bail case is filled by lawyer A and B
01/04/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A
20/05/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A
11/03/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and B
11/03/2014 : Discussion by lawyer B
29/09/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and C
08/12/2014 : Discussion by lawyer A and C
24/02/2015 : Discussion by lawyer C
26/05/2015 : Discussion by lawyer C
Punjab And Haryana High Court website reflects Advocate Name: Lawyer A
The AB was cancelled. Since IO lied on record and I got evidence through RTI under section 482 I refilled for review/recall with new advocate D. On hearing judge told that we need to take no objection from old advocate.
Please tell whom I have to take no objection:
- Advocate A whose name appears in High Court website as ‘Advocate name ‘
- Advocate A and B who both have filled the petition (Only advocate A’s name appears as advocate name in High Court website)
- Advocate C who last argued in the AB case