LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Danendra jain (manager)     24 December 2011

Why cbi is not effective

It is reported that 

There were 9928 cases pending in office of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) at the beginning of the year 2011


As on 31.10.2011 10010 cases are reported to be pending in CBI for disposal


Out of above pending cases about 2200 cases are pending for more than 10 years. Out of these many cases are pending for more than 25 years.


It is also said that government of India has not filled up 1176 posts which are vacant for years together due to some reason or the other


More than 56000  cases are reported to be pending in Supreme Court at the end of the month of October 2011.


About 42 lac cases are pending in various High Courts in the country.


As per available statistics of the year 2009. It can be said that  270 lacs of cases are pending in various lower courts, district courts and sub-divisional courts.


Based on above facts and figure it can be said that government has willfully disabled and weaken judicial system as also investigating agencies like CBI or CVC or other anti corruption agencies. It will not be an exaggeration to say that administrative, investigative and judicial machinery all have collapsed in our country.


In my view there is wilful conspiracy to keep these bodies weak, ineffective and by building undue  pressure of whimsical transfer and arbitrary rejection in promotion processes.

Adequate staff are not provided to judiciary. 

Inefficient , incapable , unskilled , untrained, unwilled and corrupt persons are mostly and wilfully provided to the valuable offices of CBI, Anti Corruption Bureau,Audit and  Inspection department,Office of CAG offices of CVC, offices of Chief vigilence Officers situated in various public sector undertakings by the order of CVC so that none of cases pertaining to key figures are not decided . Whenever it is found by powerful politicians that any judge or any CBI official or any Vigilance officers is likely to prove charges of corruption against their friends, relatives and their political colleagues, such officers are immediately transferred to some critical,sensitive and remote places. Rich people use their money and muscle powers to torture investigating officials, witnesses and police officials to weaken the case or to ensure the closure of the case or to postpone the hearing for an indefinite period.


Can Team Anna stop such whimsical and arbitrary transfers and rejection in promotion processes?


 Can Team Anna ensure adequate staff at all Anti Corruption bodies ? 


Can Team Anna compel government to provide efficient , effective, honest, stern, capable, skilled and well trained person to important bodies like CBI, High Courts, Supreme Court, Lower Courts, CVC or existing Ombudsman or in proposed office of Lokpal or Lokayukta,


It is bitter truth that most of officials working as Vigilance officers in various Public Sector Undertakings, banks, insurance companies have totally failed to stop corruption in such offices.



Thousands of cases related to corruption of employees of the organisation remains pending for years in the offices of Internal Vigilance Officers built in all government offices and eventually corrupt officials are exonerated or allowed safe retirement or at most motivated to submit resignation letter to finally close the files related to corruption, fraud and cheating.How can anyone dream of justice in such offices where even protectors are corrupt and damagers. Even vigilance officers , audit officers and inspecting officers are bribed to close the file or weaken the case or to keep the case pending on flimsy ground for decades.

www.danendrajain.blogspot.com



Learning

 3 Replies

V R SHROFF (Sr. ADVOCATE Bombay High Court Mob: 9892432152)     27 December 2011

corruption MUST HAVE LOTS OF ADVANTAGES, OTHERWISE WHO WILL SUPPORT IT, AND HOW IT WILL SURVIVE , EXIST, ?? 

I don't encourage it, but hint it out that those ruring the country is using it to protect their interest, at your cost. 

Sudhir Kumar, Advocate (Advocate)     31 December 2011

let Mr Dhaneder Jain see the encloosed file and react. His considered views will be research maerial for me.


Attached File : 781037737 factors restricting anti corruption activity.doc, 781037737 factors facilitating anti corruption activity.docx downloaded: 162 times

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     31 December 2011

All these shows that, We, the People of India know only how to talk but not how to act.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register