Should Madras High Court have initiated contempt proceedings against former minister Raja for allegedly interfering in the judicial process? |
|
Yes | 87 % |
No | 8 % |
Cant Say | 3 % |
_ | 2 % |
Total Votes Cast : 118 | |
Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
Posted by SANJAY DIXIT |
14/12/2010 22:42:18 |
High Court should be done on fast basis and the relevant authorities should fix the time-limit at all judiciary level within which the such cases must be decided. | |
Posted by Uma parameswaran |
13/12/2010 19:51:30 |
With out having proper evidence it is not possible. | |
Posted by Kamlesh Kumar Gupta |
13/12/2010 16:40:39 |
The trial of high profile cases should be done on fast-track basis and the relevant authorities should fix the time-limit at all judiciary level within which the such cases must be decided because such high-profile persons misuse the liberty and get the things moved as per own convenience. KK GUPTA | |
Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
13/12/2010 13:32:19 |
its not acceptable | |
Posted by PMMenon |
12/12/2010 10:31:06 |
Unfortunately in this great country, no politician never sent to jail nor will ever be sent to jail for whatever crime he/she does. Therefore, Raja's fate is also decied ... nothing will happen to him...rather I would not be surprised if Raja becomes the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu or Prime Minister of this country!!! Our common men are fools and stupids whereas politicians of this country are most intelligent, corrupt, thieves, murderers, rich and famous!!!! Mera Bharat Mahan!!! | |
Posted by BALAGANESH NADAR |
10/12/2010 19:53:26 |
In Tamil Nadu Most of the Judicial Officers and Judges are in the pocket of Politicians of ruling party, then how contempt proceedings against one Politician is possible? tell me:09442947852 | |
Posted by krishnarajpr |
10/12/2010 11:05:41 |
It is informed that the Advocate who represented the case has met the judge and wanted to give him mobile stating that mr.Raja is in line and would like to speak to the judge. Now, could we not trace with the mobile number of the advocate as to whether there was any call at the point of time which either dialled or received . I feel that only after finding out the same, we can conclude whether any action could be taken or not. Seniors, your comments please. | |
Posted by Advocate. Arunagiri |
10/12/2010 07:40:29 |
It is not Raja committed the contempt. He never spoken to the Judge. If this is the fact. Raja cannot be treated charged for contempt. | |
Posted by M.Sheik Mohammed Ali |
09/12/2010 12:03:03 |
it must proceedugs against raja | |
Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
08/12/2010 23:30:16 |
I think contempt proceedings not required. However, the Court should have ordered notice (suo motto) to Raja to appear and give explanation on this aspect. | |
Posted by Parthasarathi Loganathan |
08/12/2010 20:31:45 |
Let us wait for more truth in this issue. However, we need to appreciate the boldness and honesty of the Hon'ble Judge for exposing the facts in the public space. Sooner or later the Judiciary will uphold the Rule of the Law and establish its authority. We need to be patient as the matter is already sub-judice. Let us wait and watch before drawing conclusions to this sensitive poll (query) | |
Posted by Sunil Pathak |
08/12/2010 20:20:52 |
The judge should have disclosed the name on the first date it self, now it is not important. | |
Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
08/12/2010 20:06:11 |
in answer to this question my question is why that judge should not resign who have not take action against the said minister. Why shy such kind of persons allowed to remain in judiciary. | |