Dear Experts,
My wife filed divorce & interim maintenance through section 24 HMA r/w 151 CPC as interlocutory case and the same got ordered numbered IA368/2019 in HMOP (divorce)
The order also States this is filed as a MISC Application.
The main HMOP was dismissed for default in 2021 and later revived on 2022, with no explicit mention of restoring this IA.
The HC questioned this as well.
My question, As MISC Application are Supplemental in nature (running parallel) Vs. Interim Orders that are Incidental in nature,
WILL THIS IA368 INTERIM MAINTENANCE ORDER FILED AS MISC APPLICATION REVIVE ON THE REVIVAL OF THE MAIN PETITION.
My lawyer says, it becomes infructous, but opposite Counsel not agreeing to it. This is very important for me as there were arrears that would also become infructous.
Any expert insights would be greatly appreciated.