Property was under litigation for getting the tenants vacated. The litigation is resolved now. During the litigation, there was an agreement made to sell the property between the owner & a potential buyer 2 years ago for a certain value and a token advance was paid by the buyer. Now with the litigation resolved, there is a request made to buyer to reconsider the price at current market rate. The buyer is now refusing to reconsider this price change. The owner is ready to refund to the buyer the advance. The buyer is now refusing to increase the price and is also hinting to go to the court. Is the agreement that was made with the token advance valid and what is the basis that the buyer can go to the court and will the court accept such a case? How should or would the seller respond to the buyer in such a situation?