Interim maintenance dismissed

I request you all not to deteriorate me anymore....Thanking all for your concerns

@author

1) If your items are still with your husband - even if he is innocent, he should return you can take help from PS.

2) Marriage expenses borne by your parents - your husband is not responsible for it. Your parents did that out of their choice for their social image. Even if your husband's side demanded arrangements (NOT DOWRY), or anything that led to additional expenses,  your parents still CAN NOT claim that money.

Dont think Marriage comes with an insurance policy or a Guarantee card - (if it works you live happily and enjoy husband's property, if it doesnt work you get back all expenses plus maintenance. THIS  IS NOT BUSINESS !!)

3) Maintenance: If you are able to work - then you cant get maintenance. Why do you need maintenance when you are not responsible as a wife? Obviously you will not work till you get your maintenance case won.

Whatever be the reasons for separation - MONEY IS NOT A GUARANTEE IN MARRIAGE.

4) Parents Satisfaction: What satisfaction do your parents need? that they recovered all money/that they got maintenance OR that your married life is destroyed?

If your parents are really satisfied by recovering marriage expenses and maintenance - then I have no comments.

"I dont need his money, but my parents spent so much so they want it back" - this is NON SENSE and will never work.

5) Burden: what burden? Just by marrying off the daughter, parents are not absolved of their duties towards their daughters. It is a lifelong moral and ethical duty - felt only by genuine.  NGOs work for orphans, your parents cant take care of their own daughter. Funny.

Even brothers take care of married sisters - then why are your parents treating you as a burden?  Or you are just saying it to get sympathy for your parents/or to show that you are not money minded.

Just because our (non)sensible law makers say it is only husband's responsibility after marriage it doesnt remain a fact.

Tomorrow law may say " a woman can murder anyone  to protect her interests" doesnt mean ladies follow it.

Every culture has a saying (adage) - "a daughter once gone astray, returns back to her parents house"

*********************************************************************************************************************************

IF YOU WERE REALLY PHYSICALLY HURT AND TORTURED BY HUSBAND, YOUR PARENTS SHOULD BE WORRIED ABOUT YOUR LIFE, AND SATISFIED THAT YOU ARE STILL ALIVE AND HELP YOU REBUILD YOUR LIFE. IT SEEMS THEY ARE WAITING FOR FINANCIAL SETTLEMENT BEFORE BEING 'SATISFIED'.

jaan bachi, lakho paaye --> have you not heard this before?

If you respectfully rebuild your life and become successful, your (ex) husband will be put to shame.

THIS IS NOT A ROBBERY CASE, IT IS A MATRIMONIAL DISPUTE.

*********************************************************************************************************************************

If you dont like or appreciate my points, I dont care !! It is not like I am fond of 498a.