LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sunny Honey (Student)     02 March 2009

Legal Maxims required

PLEASE SEND ME THE TEXTUAL MATERIAL PERTAINING TO FOLLOWING LEGAL MAXIMS :-

 A)UT RES MAGIS VALEAT QUAM PEREAT

B)EXPRESSIO UNIUS EST EXCLUSIO ALTERIUS

C)CONTEMPORANEA EXPOSITIO EAT OPTIMA ET FORTISSIMA IN LEGE ????

 

URGENT REPLY IN THE MATTER IS SOLICITATED. ALTERNATIVELY MAIL TO SAMEERBHATIA@MAIL.COM



Learning

 3 Replies

PALNITKAR V.V. (Lawyer)     02 March 2009

About the maxim 1] UT RES MAGIS VALEAT QUAM PEREAT


   It is the legal principle under which the interpretation of the clauses must be oriented in the sense in which all can have some effect rather than the one in which some would not have had any. È un principio volto alla massima preservazione dei vincoli giuridici, che tende a salvare il vincolo piuttosto che scioglierlo. It is a principle aimed at the maximum preservation of legal constraints, which tends to save the bond rather than dissolve. Il principio è consolidato anche nelle elaborazioni di diritto privato comparato (Principles Of European Contract Law, Art.5.101 ) [1] (Unidroit principles, Art 4.1) [2] The principle is well established in the elaboration of comparative private law

PALNITKAR V.V. (Lawyer)     02 March 2009

about the second i.e. EXPRESSIO UNIUS EST EXCLUSIO ALTERIUS


 


It means the explicit mention of one (thing) is the exclusion of another

: a principle in statutory construction: when one or more things of a class are expressly mentioned others of the same class are excluded. In fact the concept is very wide. Please go to link for articles on the maxim.


https://www.experiencefestival.com/canons_of_statutory_construction_-_expressio_unius_est_exclusio_alterius

PALNITKAR V.V. (Lawyer)     02 March 2009

Contemporanea expositio est optima et fortissima in lege means contemporaneous exposition is the best and most powerful in the law. See the following link relating to a SC judgment wherein the said maxim was interpreted.


https://advocatesadvise.com/Documents/judgment_details.php?y=1960_1964&allow=1&id=97506383023583783441475363782350234909433493


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register