Got it, thanks again Mr. Kumar.

Originally posted by : Salil J
	Appreciate your response. To anwser your queries - 1. My FTC tenure was through the same employer, and I was not hired through a Contractor. Both my appointment letters are from the same entity/employer/company. 2. This is Private Commercial MNC (I am a Computer Engineer). 3. There was no mention of Gratuity component in FTC appointment letter, nor was I paid any Gratuity amount in 2014. 4. Here is the response from the employer: "We would like to inform you that the employment contracts for the period of services where different and your FTH contract was specific to defined period.  Hence on this background the gratuity computation to consider the two different contract period as continuation cannot be considered. "   Thanks, Salil

 What exactly do you mean by it!

Originally posted by : Kumar Doab
	Originally posted by : Salil J Appreciate your response. To anwser your queries - 1. My FTC tenure was through the same employer, and I was not hired through a Contractor. Both my appointment letters are from the same entity/employer/company. 2. This is Private Commercial MNC (I am a Computer Engineer). 3. There was no mention of Gratuity component in FTC appointment letter, nor was I paid any Gratuity amount in 2014. 4. Here is the response from the employer: "We would like to inform you that the employment contracts for the period of services where different and your FTH contract was specific to defined period.  Hence on this background the gratuity computation to consider the two different contract period as continuation cannot be considered. "   Thanks, Salil  What exactly do you mean by it!

I have posted employer's response in verbatim :-). I think they meant 'were', not 'where'.

You are welcome.

If required ask your union leaders, Lawyer/Law firm to get in touh with me and I shall happily share latest information,even decisions with them.

Alright.

It is good to see that you are not deterred with afflictions of Academic Query, Tutorials and have discussed your matter properly at LCI in thread initiated by you.

It is a daily and habitual irritant at LCI in all threads from day1 by the afflicted entities. 

Likewise discuss with your union leaders, LOCAL Lawyer/Law Firm in confidence.

Sure, thanks, I will do that.

Wish you the very best.

Originally posted by : Kumar Doab
	Alright. It is good to see that you are not deterred with afflictions of Academic Query, Tutorials and have discussed your matter properly at LCI in thread initiated by you. It is a daily and habitual irritant at LCI in all threads from day1 by the afflicted entities.  Likewise discuss with your union leaders, LOCAL Lawyer/Law Firm in confidence.

A very good example of lack of commonsense in Mr. Kumar Doab (unreal name and a FAKE Expert) ! 

The employee is still in service and is yet to continue his service, but Mr. Kumar Doab advises to approach a local lawyer to claim gratuity even while in service. REALLY A VERY GREAT APPROACH TO THE GRATUITY LAWS !

WHEN THE QUERIST IS STILL IN SERVICE AND ASKS A QUESTION ABOUT HIS CLAIM ABOUT GRATUITY, WHAT IS IT, IF NOT AN ACADEMIC QUERY?

Any way, best of luck, Mr. Salil, the querist !

OF COURSE, A GREAT TIME PASS BY BOTH THE QUERIST AND THE FAKE EXPERT, Mr. KUMAR DOAB, WHEN AN EMPLOYEE, STILL IN SERVICE, BUT ASPIRES TO CLAIM GRATUITY EVEN WHILE IN SERVICE !

WHERE IS THE REALITY IN DESCRIPTION OF THE PROBLEM?

@Jigyasu - I am not sure about what you mean by "The employee is still in service" when I mentioned in OP "...and served till 10-Aug-2017", so I am no longer in that service.

Originally posted by : Salil J
	@Jigyasu - I am not sure about what you mean by "The employee is still in service" when I mentioned in OP "...and served till 10-Aug-2017", so I am no longer in that service.

Mr. Salil,

If you are facing the problem in reality, you may like to reproduce the appointment orders and termination orders of both the occasions for analysis and then you may expect to get a true picture of your case as well as your entitlements, so that you may not feel any further need to extend the thread inconclusively time and again.

Yes, I am facing this issue in reality (this is not a question from a law book exercise, I am suffering this for real), this was already clarified by others (mainly Mr. Kumar). I had to extend the thread because of your slanderous posts. I have no intention to continue.

QUITE A VAGUE JUSTIFICATION ON YOUR PART !

If you are fracing this issue in reality, why you are shy of reproducing the documents asked from you? In fact, my post was not slanderous, but it was a case of misuse of the facility of charity service of the experts on your part.

A question arises, who compelled you to extend the thread, if my post was slanderous?

Who said that I am shying away? Stop drafting more and more ridiculous posts. This portal is not your father's property and no one is binding you to read through every post. Other than you no one felt that I am misusing it in whatsoever manner. I was cordial, and so were the others. 

I posted in the hope to make you see sense, but in vein. I will not be respondig to you on this matter anymore. Keep whining moron.

Originally posted by : Salil J
	Who said that I am shying away? Stop drafting more and more ridiculous posts. This portal is not your father's property and no one is binding you to read through every post. Other than you no one felt that I am misusing it in whatsoever manner. I was cordial, and so were the others.  I posted in the hope to make you see sense, but in vein. I will not be respondig to you on this matter anymore. Keep whining moron.

Oh, may probably you have considered the portal to be your own father's property.

However, there is no need to say that you are sying to post the related documents, when it has become apparent that you have failed to post the needed documents. Of course, you cannot post, when you do not possess any such document your being merely a hypothetical proble.

Further, irrespective of your statement not to respond, due to your arrogant nature you won't desist from responding to my post, as you don't have any proof to justify your problem, except to respond arrogantly.