my father filed an r.c.o.p against mr. "t.raja " in d.m court. .
we made a rental agreement and the defendant signed as t.raja. the defendant appeared inperson before arbitaration chairman and signed as t.raja. the defendant received ameena retun , register post and signed as t.raja. these signatures are in uniformity.
the defendant advocate filed a memo in the d.m court that the defendant true name is "t.shanmugasundaram.
the defendant name is amended as per i.a no
the signature of the defendant in counter affidavit is entirely diffrent from the ameena retun.
later the defendant advocate filed a memo with defendant name as "raja" . he didnot get permission to change the defendant name.
a remainder letter was sent to the defendant advocate regarding the difference in signature and the real name of the defendant. he replied that he is not responsible for this question and it has to be asked directly to the defendant. the advocates behavoiur is against the professional code of ethics as per the advocates act.
the defendant is making false statements, false affidavit before the trial court. the trial is undergoing for 2 years. every time he makes a misleading statement without any evidence and delaying the trial.
if a writ mandamus petition can be filed in the madurai bench of madras high court against the magistrate of d.m. court , praying for a jury against the defendant u/s 182,192,193,197,199,416,420 of indian penal code.
