raju
26 November 2009 at 17:10
dear sir, we have a property in delhi which was aquired by my father and his brother after partion of india.the monetery amount for resettlement was in ratio of 30% of my father and 70% of my uncle.now both my dad and uncle have expired and now the inheritants of my uncle are asking for a 70% share even though they have never entered our house for last 40 years as they are residing out of delhi..this property lease papers clearly state that 'division of property is not allwed'..on my side we have 3 inheritants i.e my mother,sister and myself..on my uncles side its also 3 inheretants i.e one brother and 2 sisters..now we want a settlement on the ratio of half and half on this property on the basis that we have been the only resident of the stated property for almost 40 years..my cousin wants to settle in ratio of 60% for him and wants to give us only 40%....does he have any legal right to enter a house occupied by only my family since past 40 years on the basis of illegal or legal grounds.please advice accordingly...thanks and regards..amit
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 17:07
I HAD A FLAT JOINTLY WITH MY UNCLE AUNT AND MYSELF ( IN THIS ORDER )
BOTH UNCLE AND AUNT EXPIRED.BY WAY OF A NOMINATION FILED THE SOCIETY HAS DELETED THE NAME OF THE FIRST TWO I.E UNCLE AND AUNT AND ADDED NAME OF THE NOMINEE.I NOW BECOME THE SECOND HOLDER.
IS THIS LEGALLY COREECT. CAN THE NOMINEES NAME COME AFTER MY NAME
PLEASE ADVICE.KINDLY REPLY TO MY EMAIL ADDRESS
Anonymous
26 November 2009 at 17:05
I HAD A FLAT JOINTLY WITH MY UNCLE AUNT AND MYSELF ( IN THIS ORDER )
BOTH UNCLE AND AUNT EXPIRED.BY WAY OF A NOMINATION FILED THE SOCIETY HAS DELETED THE NAME OF THE FIRST TWO I.E UNCLE AND AUNT AND ADDED NAME OF THE NOMINEE.I NOW BECOME THE SECOND HOLDER.
IS THIS LEGALLY COREECT. CAN THE NOMINEES NAME COME AFTER MY NAME
PLEASE ADVICE
Rekha Rao
26 November 2009 at 01:10
My father-in-law has inherited a property(residential house) from his parents. He is the sole inheritor of the same. The property is in Jamshedpur, Jharkhand.
The property is rented out to a family since the past 20 years. There is no formal rental agreement between the parties. It is a mutual agreement that the tenant deposits a decided amount in the account of my father-in-law.
Recently my father-in-law retired and wanted to sell the property so that he can invest the money in Bangalore. My husband proposed to purchase the property from him(as in future he wants to settle in Jamshedpur). My father -in-law went to Jamshedpur and met the tenants and asked them to vacate the house within 3 months.The tenants expressed their interest in purchasing that property.
Question 1: Does the tenant have any right(s) to not vacate the property and claim that to be his own or ask compensation?
Question 2: Since my father-in-law is interested in selling the property to my husband. Is my father-in-law bound to sell it to the tenant? Can the tenant contest if it is sold to my husband?
Kindly suggest what can be done
Thank you for your valuable time.
Legal_Query
25 November 2009 at 15:29
Dear Sir,
District Jhabua of MP is a notified area, it is a restriction for a non ST person to purchase land from the ST(Sec 165, 170 MP-LRC). Whether a company having all its directors belonging to ST can be treated as a company having the entity of a ST and can it be allowed to purchasee the land. Is there any provision by which a company can purchase the land from the ST (except land acquisition done by the state & granted to the company). pls provide relevant sugestions/acts
thnks & rgds
Anonymous
25 November 2009 at 09:49
I have a question about Date of Purchase of property. Which of the following is considered as date of Purchase?
(1) Date of making initial/final payment? If payment is made in installment as per stage of construction/completion.Say for instance initial 1st payment is made in sept’05, and final payment in March’06
(2) Taking over the possession of the flat? With duly signed agreement and Stamp duty paid in March’06.
(3) Registration of the property—and what if registration is yet pending.
Kindly Guide me.
Suhas
25 November 2009 at 09:06
A co-operative housing society has levied a monthly charge on an immovable property by passing a resolution in its general body meeting as permitted by bylaw 69 as specfied in the model bylaws. This has been questioned by the member in the co-operative court. court has not decided and the matter is subjudice. Further BMC has not given occupation certificate for the first and second floors of the row bungalow even though construction is done as back as 1994. Can such property be transferred by way of a gift deed by father to his son?
Ajjay
24 November 2009 at 21:26
Dear All
I have a flat in a buliding where the society is not yet formed.
I want to sell the flat, But the builder in demanding Rs. 5Lacs for transferring the flat on the new owner's name.
The sale deed is in my name(stamp duty & registration is in my name)But I want to know that before a society is formed, whether the builder has any right to ask for any transfer fees. If yes, then what is the maximum amount the builder can ask for.
What does the law says? Need help
Regards
Ajjay
raman
24 November 2009 at 21:12
Can a widow owner get back her premises from tenant using 14d of Delhi rent control act-read full before answer? Please explain practical use of Section 14-d, which was inserted in 1988 in Delhi rent control act, according to which if a widow has given a property on rent and if she demands, she can get an immediate recovery of her property. Is it true?When I discussed with 4-5 different advocates, none was aware of this provision. Why is it so that most of the advocates don’t even know about this provision, is it not in practice and if yes why? What is the meaning of word “Immediate Recovery of possession”, how much “immediate” it is? Practically how much time is taken by courts to resole such cases i.e. cases filed by widows under section 14-d of DRC? Can I get some record of Court decisions and other proceedings of such cases during last one year? What if the complainant, i.e. widow dies during court cases? Would her children or legal heir be given the same value by the court or the whole scenario of the case will be changed and the case will go on dragging for decades? Actually my mom is that widow and I am his only son ? I am living along my mother&wife&child and she had a single property of three rooms in her name of which one room my father gave on rent to a widow woman with two child's.i know were she use to live earlier. now she is not even paying the rent, and harassing my mom in different ways? We never entered any written agreement with that tenant and we have never given him any receipt of rent also. Neither we nor he has any written proof of tenancy or rent mutually settled. Actually the rent of that property is below Rs. 3500/--per month. We are thinking of filing a suit against him under 14-D of DRC, we even fear that my mother may be killed by that tenant because she is living alone there in that house. Is there any provision of filing some summary suit in such cases through which we may repossess our property quickly? Please suggest the best, quickest & easiest legal way get our property’s possession back. Plz. help, we are in great trouble.Is my mother's witness compulsory?
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
dispute
dear sir, we have a property in delhi which was allotted to my father and his brother after partion of india against the properties of my grandfather in pakistan. the monetery amount for resettlement given to my father and uncle by the ministry of urban development was in ratio of 30% of my father and 70% of my uncle.now both my dad and uncle have expired and now the inheritants of my uncle are asking for a 70% share even though they have never entered our house for last 40 years as they are residing out of delhi..this property lease papers clearly state that 'division of property is not allowed'..on my side we have 3 inheritants i.e my mother,sister and myself..on my uncles side its also 3 inheretants i.e one brother and 2 sisters..now we want a settlement on the ratio of half and half on this property on the basis that we have been the only resident of the stated property for almost 40 years..my cousin wants to settle in ratio of 60% for him and wants to give us only 40%....does he have any legal right to enter a house occupied by only my family since past 40 years on the basis of illegal or legal grounds.please advice accordingly...thanks and regards..amit