Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 20:04
my father died without making a will.now my broher and sister want partition of property .its ok i donot have any problem with that but they are not accept any amount of money i give to my father . and i donot have the any written proof about this money.
MAHESH JOTIBA KOCHERI
03 November 2009 at 18:51
we had purchased a flat ,the agreement also was done, after that we found that the builder had changed the winges without our knowledge . due to which my flat position has changed which i dont want.i will have to now rectify this by making a rectification deed.the agreement of the builder dose not mention any details regarding the position of the flat like, whether its on the road side , garden side etc.except the wing and the flat No.in short i feel that the agreement is incomplete, can we take a stand against the builder for this
also pls guide me as to wat shud be the matter of the rectification deed, so that its complete
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 18:09
PLease help:
Can a trustee also be the beneficiary of the trust, what is the legal position on this.
shubh chandrika
03 November 2009 at 17:03
Dear Experts,
the case is as follows:
A is a builder. he leased his plot to B (an IT company). the terms of agreement were that B would occupy the leased property in future when the building would be constructed and would pay the rental charges therefrom.
but, after the stipulated time, when the building was constructed, B relinquished his right to the leased property by signing a relinquishment deed and payed consideration as damages to A.
but now A has contended in the Court that it has been a violation of the agreement.
but, B has already by way of relinquishment deed, paid A consideration in the form of damages by free consent of both A & B.
how can B maintain his case in the Court regarding this?
i shall be requesting the Hon'ble Court for an injunction through specific relief act on grounds of apprehension that A may sell that property to some third party before the case is sorted out in regard to the agreement (A had promised B that unless the agreement is sorted out , B shall have right to the Property as the lessee).
Also I wil be adding on "future Promise as consideration" to prove the agreement between my client B and A as a valid agreement. is it correct?
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 14:22
dear sirs,
it is to draw your kind attention that my grand father(Nana g) died in 2009 having a registered will in 2004 may,giving all share to his sons excluding my mumy and her two sisters.
My query is this that is there any way for my mother to get her share in her father self accuried property?
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:02
Dear sirs,
My query is this that a person died leaving 2 sons and 3 daughters.as his will is registered but the language of will is not correct,as there is a lot of mistakes in drafting that will.
my querey is this that if language is not corret then it will be beneficial for the daughters to get share for the said property if the property is self aquired.
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 13:02
I live with my mother in an ownership flat in Mumbai which is solely in her name. I am a nominee. She is keen to add my wife and my name to the share certificate during her lifetime. What is the procedure?
Also, is it true that I would have to pay stamp duty if my mother were to transfer the flat in our names during her lifetime?
Thank you
Anonymous
03 November 2009 at 12:13
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
Ram
03 November 2009 at 12:12
My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Cancellation of registered gift deed
My father transferred his flat to me by executing a gift deed and the same had been registered with the sub registrar about a year ago. But till date we haven't submitted the documents in the society. Now we wish to cancell that gift deed so that the ownership of the flat remains with my father. Please suggest what is the procedure. Do we have to pay the stamp duty once again? Will it be valid if we execute a mutual documents stating that the gift deed is cancelled and I provide my NOC and register these documents with sub-registrar?