Arvind Singh Chauhan
27 February 2010 at 21:47
"A" was being prosecuted for 497 IPC, and 125 Cr.P.C. His where about was not known. He was arrested due to NBW issued by court in 497. police arrested him while he was withdrawing pension from bank at home town. He was army retired personal. In court's file his address is old one of his real village, but later he eloped with one lady. After releasing on bail he died in U.P. His dead body found in train.
His wife having three children and is leading very measurable life without money. Now no body is known about his bank balance in other cities, the only pension account of his home town is traceable. His service documents and other papers are also not traceable. His wife needs family pension. How can she be helped. Please advice if any member having knowledge of this particular matter.
ravi anu ramraika
27 February 2010 at 20:55
respected sir, lagbhag 20 din pahle maine newspaper main padha tha ki main suchana adhikari india ne kaha ki income tax written is public property, maine jab apne c.a.se kaha to usne kaha, how it is possible,aur agar aayega bhi to public sevent ke liye.maine news paper main padha hai,lekin net main kahi search nahi kar paaya, iska matlab ab koi bhi meri va aapki income tax written hasil kar sakta hai,
govind kumar
27 February 2010 at 16:25
please give me the syllabus of delhi judicial examination syllabus and rajasthan judicial examination syllabus
neeru20021
27 February 2010 at 15:39
Helo friends,
thanks for your replies. They are engaged in diploma in excise, sale tax, accountancy or we can say indirect taxes. please tell me from where they can get affilation or recognition for these type of courses. these courses are in class-room mode as well as Distance mode also.
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 15:28
If the Govt. Vehicle say Army vehicle is involved in an fatal accident on road, can the legal heirs of the deceased file a case for compensation under the MV Act? Is Govt. (Army) liable for payment of compensation? Cannot they say, they are discharging state function, therefore not liable to pay compensation under MV Act?
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 14:15
Please from where I can download the Judgement of the Honable Supreme Court under Ref. 1995 Supp. (4) Supreme Court Cases 590 Shripal Jain v/s Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Others.
If anybody having this judgement pls mail me. to "pchatterjee5@rediffmail.com"
Thnaks/P.Chatterjee
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 14:11
This is to inform you that I have lost/misplaced 200 shares of a company in 1996, which were registered in my name and the same has been intimated to the company immediately by Regd. Post with A/D and requested them for stop transfer and for issue of duplicate shares, but the company inspite of my repeated reminders directly to them and through Investors Grievances Cell of SEBI, NSE, DSE, BSE till 1999 not responded my any communications.
Thereafter in early 1999 the Company sent me a back dated letter having date of Nov.1998 along with a copy of a letter of a broker of NSE who have simply claimed the said 200 shares on the ground that their one sub-broker who has already closed his business, delivered the said 200 shares, without supporting any document in support of their claim and accordingly the Company refused to issue me duplicate shares and asked me to settle the matter with the said NSE broker, which was strongly objected by me by saying that I have no relation with the said broker/sub-broker in any manner whatsoever but the Company did not paid any heed on my request.
Thereafter in 2000 I approached the Dist. Consumer forum against the Company and from the written statement filed by the Company, I came to know that out of 200 shares, 100 shares has been transferred by the company in favour a third party(a nominee of the said NSE broker.) I strongly taken up the matter before the company through my advocate’s letter for recall and cancellation of the said fraudulent transfer of 100 shares in favour of third party but inspite of my repeated reminders once again the Company did not paid any heed on my request. My above case was dismissed by the Ld Forum on contest on the ground of limitation and Jurisdiction.
Thereafter I have filed a title suit for declaration and mandatory injunction against the company and the said NSE broker. The said suit was contesting by the company but the said NSE broker avoided to appear, hence expartie against them but unfortunately the suit was dismissed in 2005 without having trial on evidence on the ground of Limitation and Jurisdiction by relying upon a judgment of the Hon able Supreme Court under Ref. 1995 Supp. (4) Supreme Court Cases 590 Shripal Jain v/s Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Others in which it was held that “The proper forum in respect of issuance of duplicate shares on account of loss of original ones is not the Civil Court but the Registrar of Company who should have enquiry under section 84(4) read with the Rules and taken a decision himself… Companies (Issue of Share Certificates) Rules – 1960, (filed by the Company).
Thereafter I challenged the above judgment in appeal court but the same was also dismissed in Jan.2010 as per findings of the lower court and above judgment of Supreme Court.
Thereafter in view of above judgment of Supreme Court, I once again requested the company and their Registrar and share transfer agent to draw up the proceedings for issuance of duplicate shares, but the company once again did not paid any heed on my request nor replied my any communication.
Under the circumstances please advise me what is to be done and which is the right forum and the sections under which I got relief in such type of case. Thanks/P Chatterjee
Anonymous
27 February 2010 at 13:16
Dear Sir / Madam,
As per the union budget 1% home loan Subsidy for the property value less than 20L and loan upto 10L to individual. My property value is below 20 L and my loan sanction is 12.6 L. Am i eligible for above scheme?
Thanks & Regards
parshotam lal
27 February 2010 at 08:20
I have hired a lwayer for allahabad high court from chandigarh. I ahve paid a huge amount in advance. From past 9 months he is delaying the case.He has not attended the court. Counter affidavit has been filed from the opposite party but my lawyer has not replied to it till now. He is avoiding it.What could be done against him
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Rights of a Respondent
I am a respondent in a motor vehicle accident case. This is a case for compension under section140/163/A I have appointed an advocate but is too raw. I wish to cross examine the doctor myself. Will the court allow me to do this? with my advocate standing by my side? If yes
under what legal provision I can do it? I mean if the judge refuses for this what legal points I have to cite in support of my right to cross examine.
Alternatively can I stand along with my advocate during the cross & openly prompt him as to the questions to be asked?