Monish Nilwant
17 May 2008 at 07:25
what is the difference between a co-operative bank and a nationalised bank.
M.A.T.Ganesan
16 May 2008 at 22:14
is there any difference between 'burden of proof' and 'onus of proof ?
Bharat Gala
16 May 2008 at 17:31
I have the query with regards to the jurisdiction of the court.
I have my office in Mumbai.I was contacted by a sales executive of one Publisher who has his office in New Mumbai and HO in chandigarh. Now due to payment dispute he has file a civil case in the Chandigadh civil court. I have not met any person from Chandigarh and Business card given by the sales executive has New Mumbai office address. Can I ask that the Chandigadh Court has no jurisdiction?or can i get the case transferred to Mumbai Court? Pls. advice me.
parikshit rajvaidya
16 May 2008 at 14:54
pls provide me high court or suprime court's judgement under Motor Accident claim act on the following point
whether a woman get claim of her husbands death ? if she has got married during the pendency of claim case in the trail court ?
vinod
16 May 2008 at 14:53
if a matter is decided by the ombudsman in the insurance claim , can one let the matter be decided by the redressal forums under consumer protection act . does the priciple of resjudicata hit it?
ASHUTOSH
16 May 2008 at 13:13
i have file a suit for recovery in delhi which was dismissed Exparti by ADJ on the basis of section 34 of Evidence act he say ledger is not sufficent to sue a person. i have not file at that time bills/invoices. now i got and file review on the basis of discovery of bills/invoice pls tell a judgement who support my case iam representing a company and defendant was also company after service of review they are again not coming
ambika.S
12 May 2008 at 20:24
whether pemanent lok adalath decide a case on merits if the concilliation is failed?
umapathi.s
08 May 2008 at 11:05
sir, I have made a serious compalint to the Managing Director of the nationalised bank regarding corruption by the Deputy General Manager of the same bank who is prima facie involved in corrution in transferring of officers in violation of transfer policy. I have submitted the same to MD of the bank giving instances of violiation of polices and favour granted to some offcials of the bank to retain them in the same center of posting for more than 5 years. now, the DGM of the bank aggreived by this compalint is proposing to lodge a defamation case against me. whether he can file such case ? they have not concluded the comaplaint as false or baseless ? can a citizen be prevented from filing a complaint about corruption by public servent by filing such defamation case against the complainant? what are the remedies avabaile in case the case is filed aganist me ? I have done it in public interest and supported by logical conclusions. can mere allegation of corruption can be source of filing a defamation case against the citizen ? pl clarfiy.
R. Brizmohan Singh
07 May 2008 at 20:42
Dear Sir,
Can anyone explain whether in a case of unfilled but executed pronote, the plaintiff is entitled to recover when the rate of interest column was filled up after execution without intimation to the defendant as distinct from filling up of other columns. Can you also cite any Supreme Court Judgement to the effect that rate of interest is a separate contract and would not fall within meaning of inchoate instrument as to get protection under the Negotiable Instruments Act and in particular Section 20 of the said Act.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
who is to bear for faulty service.
I m having a mobile connection from Vodafone services for the last three years.
The problem with their service is that at any point of time during a day, their connection goes off no matter whether i m somewhere in the basement or on the upper floor. due to which incoming call hinder.
And after certain minutes, their comes a message from the company that i hve so and so missed call and if i want to know i hve to send a message costing Rs.3 per message.
i want to know why customer has to bear for the faulty service or connection of the company. if the company's frequency hinders sometimes, we left deprived of any important call we need to hve access to.
on one hand, the company's connection is faulty and on the other, consumer have to pay for that. isn't their any legal help i can have.
i talked with my friends and they also hve same problem but they nvr come forward. they are better spending Rs.3 than lot of money and time in lenghthy proceedings...pls help....