Perumal Prabhu
09 October 2009 at 13:03
Sir please give me a Solution on the issue mentioned bellow
In connection with an agreement two tenderes has submitted their tender documents after the clousere time (delayed tender).As per our tender conditions Lat/Delayed tender and tender offers, received through post after the time of closing of receipt of tender documents, will be summarily rejected. I would like to brig to your notice that the delayed tender is not sent through post but is was submitted in person. The tender documents are not accepted by the tender committee and the same are not opened and the same are kept as it is. Now the tenderers are demanding for relese of the EMD and tender cost.
In these circumstances what will be the appropriate step to resove the above issue
1. Can we open the teneder cover and release the EMD
2. or can we send the tender documents to the tenderers without opening the cover
3. can we release the tender cost
mohd mohsin
09 October 2009 at 12:35
Respected sir,
please send me the fee structure for enrolment in dehi high court and clear that how many draft to be made and whose favour
Reena
09 October 2009 at 12:18
Hi, I have completed my LLb & was working for IL&FS deputed at IBM Blr for 4.5 yrs as admin executive.
I am now moved to Pune & is planning to do a course on IPR. Will this provide me a good career opportunity. I am more interested to work in a corporate Co. or a Law firm.
Kindly advise.
Regards,
Reena.
Suhas
09 October 2009 at 12:18
My query is as follows:
There is a company which is pursuing legal action against an individual in a magistrate court. The authorised representative of the company stood for examination-in-chief. Thereafter the authorised representative of the company stood for cross-examination, and before the cross examination was completed, the said authorised representative left the services of the company.
When a new representative of the company is subtituted to appear in place of the original person, will the already completed examination-in-chief, and the partially completed cross-examination continue to stand, or will the examination-in-chief and cross-examination have to be conducted afresh?
Thanks
Nishant Khosla
09 October 2009 at 11:39
i wanted to know the full facts of the case like the persons who went along with virsa singh were having any kind of weapons in their hand i want the full case full facts pl its urgent.
ponnala
09 October 2009 at 10:39
Dear Experts of forum,
This case pertains to A P , and i was told that the Probation of will is not necessary in Andhra Pradesh State. Is it true?
And friends i need clarification;In this case the property had come to Legatee from a Widower.Where she distributes Two Sy. Nos. say 1 & 2 among the Three persons, includes her i)Daughter, ii)Son-in-law, and iii)son-in- law's adopted son's Wife, And further in the will she uses the sentence, that " all my remaining lands which are either in my personal cultivation or under tenants are bequeathed to Shri.****(Legatee)"Mr. X", after my life time he shall take appropriate proceedings for either recovery of the land or of compensation from the persons in occupation and take possession of lands which are under my occupation "
Here again some of the lands were with her own son-in-law "Mr.Y"( Under occupation since 1953, not parted under any instrument).(She has only one Daughter, And the legatee is Son-in-law's Brother).
In the above contest who owns the Property, And During the Life time of "Mr.Y",he disposed of the lands under his Occupation . Can this act, of his (i.e "Mr.Y") is proper in view of The Will?
Kindly Guide me.
With regards....
Adinath@Avinash Patil
09 October 2009 at 08:39
THIS IS FOR RECENTLY ASKED QUERY REGADING FOREIN CHEQUE DIHONURED AND ALL LEARNED MEMBERS LAWYERS CLUB OF INDIA.
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT A881-- SRCTIONS 138,135,136,137--DISHONURE OF CHEQUE-PRESUMPTION ABOUT FOREIGN LAW AND TERRITORIAL JUEISDICTION--CHEQQUE DRAWN ON FOREIGN BANK IN SINGAPORE-PRESENTED BY COMPLAINANT AT MADRAS IN INDIA WHERE HIS COMPANY IS SITUATED -COMPLAIT HAS NO ACCOUNT IN ANY BANK IN SINGAPORE-SECTION 136 AND 137 ARE SUFFICIENTSAFE GUARDS FOR COMPAIES IN INDIA TO PROCEED AGAINST FOREIGN COMPANIES -IF INSTRUMENTS DISHONURED- NO BAR FOR PROSECUTION IN INDIA.
TRILUX TECHNOLOGY SINGAPORE PVT.LTD.V/S BOOM TECHNOLOGIES REP.BY ITS MANAGER.
DECIDED ON.29/03/2004. MADRAS HIGH COURT.
2004 DCR 642.
ravi pratap sharma
09 October 2009 at 08:02
My dad (Army Retd.)unfortunately died on feb09 and hence my mom started getting a family pension. I want to know about which ITR and the taxing, what benefits can be claimed, what if the 1 lac limit in s.80 is not claimed any other way like gift to her son, or daughter in law or grandson. what are other benifits if the annual income comes to 3lac including "income from other sources" eg interest, income from house rent etc.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
SHARE IN HUF PROPERTY
BACKGROUND :
When the sons were minor, certain ancestral agricultural lands were partitioned and registered in the name of the father , two out of seven brothers, grandmother, and mother to save the same from land ceiling. The remaining agricultural land remained in the name of the father, though it is ancestral. Similarly, rented shops were also got partitioned in the name of all seven brothers ,grand mother, mother and father to save income tax. At that time the partial partition was allowed under the Income Tax Act. The situation at present is that partition has not been done of the ancestral property remaining in the name of the father. The books of account are common for all the income from various assets though registered in different names. The income tax return is filed separately for partitioned assets in the name of the brother,mother ,father and grand mother.
QUERY:
Now Sir, my query is that : Whether the brothers in whose name the agricultural lands were registered to save it from land ceiling , do still have right to claim share in the agricultural land(standing in the name of the father ) and also the agricultural land which was registered in the name of the father on partition which is being shown as H.U.F. property in income tax return, filed as H.U.F. return of father as karta? If yes in what status they will receive the same as HUF or as Individual ?
Thanks.