emveeemvee
20 September 2009 at 02:24
Is there provision to have stay order from hi court against possession notice given by the Bank (under sarfaresi act ) with eviction order from CJM court and also for police protection ?riven
jaya
20 September 2009 at 00:57
A judgement is passed in favour of the employer in a case filed by an employee against the employer in Division Bench. On appeal by the employee , single judge in High Court has given judgement in favour of the employee . But on appeal by the employer, bench having 2 high court judges, passed judgement in favour of the employer giving reason that the single judge either not taken into view the earlier judgement passed by the division bench or not referred the case for larger bench in case of disagreement with the judgement by dn bench. Whether this is correct ? Pl give yr views.riven
Suresh C Mishra
19 September 2009 at 22:47
in one case in the year May 2006 the HSC has sent jail to one siting Minister , i want the party name and citation for the purpose of the study of this case. Pl help me.riven
Sumit Lal
19 September 2009 at 22:29
In a given case, the District Consumer Forum has passed/pronounced a judgment in the month of June 2009 in presence of the lawyer for the respective parties.
The lawyer for the aggrieved party has obtained a certified copy of the order and sent the same to its Client.
The judgment has not been communicated by the district forum to the aggrieved party till date.
In the above circumstance, whether the proposed appeal before the State Commissionn will be time barred?riven
Himanshu
19 September 2009 at 22:09
Can we execute and register Leave and License Agreement for open land in mumbairiven
Member (Account Deleted)
19 September 2009 at 21:38
Bank pays for blacklisting, threatening customer
C Unnikrishnan | TNN
Mumbai: The next time a bank offers a free credit card, think twice before saying yes. An advocate learnt this the hard way when a bank recently went to the extent of notifying his name as a defaulter with the Credit Information Bureau of (India) Limited (Cibil) even though it was not his fault.
The move meant that the advocate, K P Sreejith, would have found it impossible to avail a bank loan. However, refusing to take things lying down, Sreejith sued the bank, which was then directed by the consumer dispute redressal forum to pay up Rs 25,000 towards ‘mental agony and loss of reputation’ and another Rs 5,000 towards cost of litigation.
In August 2007, Barclay Bank approached Sreejith and offered a free life-time credit card considering his “good payment track record”. Sreejith, who was initially reluctant, accepted the offer. On October 7, 2007, he made a purchase of Rs 918 through the card. A month later, the bank informed Sreejith over phone that he had not made the payment due on November 17. Sreejith claimed that he had not received the statement but promptly paid the amount in accordance with the bank’s instructions. But soon he got the statement, in which where he was charged Rs 300 towards delayed payment. After Sreejith failed to get through to the bank over the phone, he sent an e-mail explaining the situation and requested them waive off the late fee. The bank reverted saying the m at t e r had been forwarded to the department concerned. Even as the dispute was on, the late fee amount accumulated to Rs 2,000 and the bank allegedly sent recovery agents, who threatened Sreejith with dire consequences if the amount was not paid.
On January 4, 2008, the bank sent a letter to Sreejith asking him to pay Rs 734 and suspended his card. In February, the bank wrote saying the card would be permanently withdrawn and details would be forwarded to Cibil. On March 3, the bank carried out its threat after which Sreejith approached the consumer forum. The bank denied issuing any threats and said levying late fee was proper. The bank also said that Cibil is not a defaulters’ list but only a data base of customers’ credit history. The bank filed an affidavit saying the charges were reversed and there was no outstanding, which was intimated to Cibil.
The forum comprising president S P Mahajan and members Jyoti Iyer and S S Patil observed the bank had no regards for RBI directives as complaints to the customer services head was not attended to. “The act of the bank in employing recovery agents is highly deplorable and it appears that the bank has no respect for the rule of the law.’’ the forum added.
_______________________
Please comment
riven
Alok Kumar Sharma
19 September 2009 at 21:11
My clients were working in a factory which was illegally closed down by the employer. Subsequently, State Govt. granted permission to close down with retrospective effect. They were directed to be reinstated with full back wages. Employer has challenged the order before High Court taking a plea that factory is closed. Will my clients be entitled to get the last drawn wages u/s 17 B or not?riven
MM
19 September 2009 at 21:10
Hello,
I stay in kalyan(Maharashtra) & would like to gift the existing Flat to wife , as iam planning to buy 2nd flat. I would like to know the procedure for the same like gift deed , stamp duty , registration etc along expenses & time frame to complete the same.
thanks !!riven
Bharat Jain
19 September 2009 at 20:00
Subject: Mis-Use Of IRDA License by Insurance Company To Attain Sales Targets
With regard to above subject, Please guide if what actions can be taken against the insurance company & how the agent may get compensated for fraud done by the company.
Insurance company has logged in a policy in my agent code with fradulent signature of me.
Also the agent commision of same policy is not paid to the agent. I came to know about after receiving mail from IT Department stating TDS receipt from the Insurance Co.
Pl. Guide
Facts Known to me -
Only IRDA licensed agents can sell Insurance.
Agent is required to submit a confidential report stating insured persons financials & giving true information which is used by the Company to Underwrite the Policy Document.
Signature is forged by the Company Officials.
Immideate Help required in this matter.riven
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Injunction
If injunction is not granted by the trial court, then whether ordering notice to the respondents is appealable or whether the same can be challenged under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ?Any case laws ?riven