PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
11 September 2009 at 23:56
hello all learned experts
in our city generally parents of the child send the children by the passanger chakdo rixa for the school but now question is that they all rixa owner haved monopoly and exploit all parents and recover the extra vacation fees and also take too much rent for the drop of the students and also takes more students in the rixa more than capacity and also harrash tothe parants can we can take order for the standerfair rent) for the monthly period as well as bombay rent act
regardsriven
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
11 September 2009 at 23:50
an accident taken place and long time passed but not claim lodged by the victim after the passing some time victim died not the due to the accident but in normal course now the heirs want to lodge claim wheter is it possible if yes u/s which m v act psl advice meriven
raj
11 September 2009 at 23:19
DEAR LEARNED COUNSEL!
In 1995,we got divorce through lok adalat.We had a girl child and the mother opted for guardianship.But after some time due to certain changed circumstances my child came to me [through police]and residing with me.I am taking care of her since then.But recently my ex wife filed an EP against me stating that i willfully voided the terms in the decree and prayed the court to apply order xxi,rule 37 and 38 of CPC.I submitted my answer to the honourable family court with all evidences.The honourable court issued orders in the EP stating that IT IS JUST AND NECESSARY TO ISSUE NOTICE UNDER ORDER XXI,RULE 37 OF CPC BY 22OF SEPTEMBER.Susequently i filed a GW OP under section 25 and 39 with section 10.
Can i approch high court for seeking STAY OF further orders of EP?riven
ragavendra babu
11 September 2009 at 22:39
I had rented ground floor of my ancestral house in chennai on 11 months leave and license agreement in 2007 march.At the end of lease period the tenant was requested to vaccate as I need the premises for own use.My sister who is joint owner occupies the first floor.The tenant continued to stay under some pretext and finally when written notice was served in jul 09 ,he has stopped paying rent and has threatended to go to court.I am an ex-servicemen and do not own any house in chennai,my house is 40 yrs old in delapitated condition and needs to be extensively repaired.I understand that serving armed forces personnel and ex-servicemen have some privilage of seeking early settlement from authorities.Can anybody adviceriven
Suresh C Mishra
11 September 2009 at 22:13
it order to remove the confusion i want to know whether the Labour Authorities like Assitt/deputy Labour Commissioner are appointed as auhtority under the MW/ PW ACT if yes from the date of notification ? and notification if any ? Whether they were in the year 1990 or not ?riven
Suresh C Mishra
11 September 2009 at 22:07
sir please provide me prescribed form application form and other related forms required under the EPF and ESI Act in a soft copy if available.
what is the procedure of late deposite of contribution in the both of the /////acts.riven
Amandeep Singh
11 September 2009 at 21:52
Sir,
My father got property share under arbitration award between three of the brothers including my father, but after the award got registered and became a decree and my father's brother challenged on some false grounds claiming large amount of money from us and finally in order to settle the dispute we admit to give the amount of Rs549000 on sale of our property in which we are living and he is also living with us in a room occupied by him.Now when we are ready to sell our house he is demanding 8 lacs more to vacate the property. We are at a loss to know what to do please suggest should we go to court again as the below mentioned compromise deed also written in the courts.
My father Sarvjit Singh
His brother Kuljit Singh
This Compromise Deed is executed on 18-02-2009 at Ludhiana amongst Sh.Kuljit Singh-Petitioner and the respondent No. 1 & 3.
Whereas the aforesaid objection petition is pending against the Arbitration Award dated 11-12-2007 registered on 14-12-2007 with the Sub-registrar, Ludhiana in this Hon’ble Court.The parties have arrived at Compromise and terms & conditions of the same are as under, which is part & parcel and suplementary to the said Award.
1. That the H.No. B-I-815, Ludhiana will be sold in the open market by Sh. Sarvjit Singh within 6 months from the date of getting a T.S..-1 from M.C. Ludhiana. The original time period of 6 months for selling the house will be extended for reasonable time, if any legal complication arises.
2. That none of the parties and their family members of the Arbitration Award shall have no right to purchase the said house in any manner directly or indirectly.
3. That till the sale of the said house, Sh.Kuljit Singh –petitioner has a right to stay and enjoy the said house in a husbandry manner.
4. That after paying Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) to Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner by Sh. Sarvjit Singh-respondentNo.1, rest of the consideration amount will belong to Sh. Sarvjit Singh absolutely.
5. That the said amount of Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) shall be paid by Sh.Sarvjit Singh-respondent No.1 to Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner at the time of the sale of the house out of the sale proceeds.
6. That on receipt of Rs.5,49,000/-(Rupees Five Lac Forty Nine Thousand only) ,all the claims of Sh.Kuljit Singh-petitioner in respect of the estate of deceased Sh.Gurcharan Singh,father of the objector/petitioner,shall be fully settled and nothing shall be remained due towards Sh.Sarvjit Singh and his family and Smt.Surinder Kaur- respondent No.3.
7. That the above said terms and conditions are part & parcel and suplement to the said Arbitration Award and the same is enforceable and executable along with the above said terms.
8. That each party will give his affidavit regarding no objection for the change of ownership as per the Arbitration Award.
and sir please tell what relations are covered in the term family members.riven
sunil
11 September 2009 at 21:25
Sir/ Madam
Kindly guide me wheather prathma degree of Hindi sahitya Sammelan,Alahabad is valid for centeral govt employement.is it equall to Matric.
Thanks.riven
SATISH KUMAR
11 September 2009 at 21:01
Sir,
my eldset brother was appointed as head constable on 03-01-1969 in CRPF.on 22-11-1985 he was promoted as Inspector.On 14-03-1984 an incident happened at manipur and he was post commander then.he was served a charge sheet on 14-07-1987 as responsible for this incident unders section 11 of the CRPF Act,1945- "neglect of duty".Enquiry was held. Enquiry report was not supplied to him even when requested. he appealed to the Disciplinary Authority his submissions w/o copy of the enquiry report.No show Cause notive was served upon him. His services were terminated on 31-10-1988.His appeal and revision within the deptt. were rejected with one sentence order. Then he approached courts of law. his suit was dismissed twice by two lower courts at Delhi. Then he appealed to the ADJ. The ADJ ruled in his favour. CRPF refused to comply with the ADJ judgment declared on 01-08-2005.State went in for Appeal to Delhi High Court on 02-12-2005 by filing appeal and appln. for condonation of delay for 20 days.His counsel did not file reply to the Appeal. But wanted to argue the case straight away.Till date the case could not be argued bcz the Judge kept on giving adjournments on one reason or the other.Kindly suggest course of action thru which the case can be put on quick hearing. Is there delay of only 20 days or more as per Law of Limtation applicable? secondly what steps are required now by the respondents in this case.he has now abandoned his lawyer bcz of causing intentional delay.may be both sides counsels are conniving together to ensure natural death of the case and against the respondent.Kindly suggest a specialist service matters lawyer (with address and mobi. no.) at Delhi High Court who would charge most reasonable fee as he does not have any money to pay as fee. Kindly also suggest leading case laws citations in favour of the respondent.
regards,
Yours Truly,,
Satish Kumarriven
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
judgement for the rape case for bail
hello all learned have u any judgment general which can help for the bail out in the offence of non bailable offence if u have particullary of the offence rape pls provideriven