SATISH KUMAR
11 September 2009 at 21:01
Sir,
my eldset brother was appointed as head constable on 03-01-1969 in CRPF.on 22-11-1985 he was promoted as Inspector.On 14-03-1984 an incident happened at manipur and he was post commander then.he was served a charge sheet on 14-07-1987 as responsible for this incident unders section 11 of the CRPF Act,1945- "neglect of duty".Enquiry was held. Enquiry report was not supplied to him even when requested. he appealed to the Disciplinary Authority his submissions w/o copy of the enquiry report.No show Cause notive was served upon him. His services were terminated on 31-10-1988.His appeal and revision within the deptt. were rejected with one sentence order. Then he approached courts of law. his suit was dismissed twice by two lower courts at Delhi. Then he appealed to the ADJ. The ADJ ruled in his favour. CRPF refused to comply with the ADJ judgment declared on 01-08-2005.State went in for Appeal to Delhi High Court on 02-12-2005 by filing appeal and appln. for condonation of delay for 20 days.His counsel did not file reply to the Appeal. But wanted to argue the case straight away.Till date the case could not be argued bcz the Judge kept on giving adjournments on one reason or the other.Kindly suggest course of action thru which the case can be put on quick hearing. Is there delay of only 20 days or more as per Law of Limtation applicable? secondly what steps are required now by the respondents in this case.he has now abandoned his lawyer bcz of causing intentional delay.may be both sides counsels are conniving together to ensure natural death of the case and against the respondent.Kindly suggest a specialist service matters lawyer (with address and mobi. no.) at Delhi High Court who would charge most reasonable fee as he does not have any money to pay as fee. Kindly also suggest leading case laws citations in favour of the respondent.
regards,
Yours Truly,,
Satish Kumarriven
parshotam Singh
11 September 2009 at 20:45
Please guide me how can i file case in consumer court against the dealer for not replacing the defected item within waranty period.riven
parshotam Singh
11 September 2009 at 20:31
Can I file a case against the company for extra mobile call charges which i have not made. please advice.riven
Shekhar Warhate
11 September 2009 at 20:22
i am defendant i have possession of suit land but in 7/12 extracct perva in the name of plaintiff. now i apply to tahsildar and requested to investigate the matter and put the name in perva the person who possessed suit land. the talathi in spot pachnama put his remark that the suit field in the possession of defendant. is it sufficient to prove the possession on suit land. the case is fixed for hearing on exh.5 tell me with recent case laws.riven
Tipsy
11 September 2009 at 20:05
Is it compulsory to file M-20 Bond by all the members of the Committee? Is it to be executed jointly or individually? What are the consequences of not filing it with the Societies Registrar? Can anyone send me the text of the M-20 bond to my email:
april2march@gmail.comriven
Shivani Kadam
11 September 2009 at 19:30
Is there any partisular site from where we can get the case details of case laws related to impeachment?
Can art.124 cl.5 constitutional law of india could be taken as adefense for improper impeachment process?
can motion of the house be considered valid even after the house is dissolved and a new houde is formed in the same year?
riven
Amarjeet yadav
11 September 2009 at 19:19
hi, In my case i m the complainant in a case u/s 302/34 ipc. the trail court aquitted the accuseds in absance of proper evidence(as the police under the influence of the accuseds doesnot produce the all evidence). i made appeal to the high court through state which was dismissed by the high court. Now i want to go for supreme court but the state is not willing to go for supreme court. now can u plz tell me:-
1. whether i can go to supreme court under slp being a informant/complainant.
2. what if the state does not appeal in this?
3. if yes under what provision.
riven
Shekhar Warhate
11 September 2009 at 19:17
my party is bank, a person borrowed the loan from my bank and not paid the loan amount. person issued the cheque in the name of bank of joint account of person and his father cheque bounsed with funds insufficient. after some days the person who borrowed the loan is died,bank give me the bounced cheque for sending notice u/s138 of n.i.act. is he liable for the loan of his son due to joint accout and is he come wihtin the criateria of n.i.act tell me with ciatetionriven
Saj
11 September 2009 at 18:54
The current share certificate is signed by the present Chairman/MD of the company. Is it required to change the share certificate if a new Chairman/MD joins ?
riven
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
recognition of Hindi sahitya sammelan degree
Sir/ Madam
Kindly guide me wheather prathma degree of Hindi sahitya Sammelan,Alahabad is valid for centeral govt employement.is it equall to Matric.
Thanks.riven