vinod bansal
30 August 2009 at 22:27
R/Members
Will anyone plz provide me legal Dictionary (for downloading)Thanx in antipitation
tdeli
30 August 2009 at 21:41
I have to defend an appeal at ITAT .Can anyone please answer my queries..
1.In paper book form one has to file all those papers and evidences which one had filed before the assessing officer and CIT Appeals . Can one file Brief history of the case along with the paper book as it was not part of the the papers filed before the lower authorities.
2.Do one needs to file compilation along with paper book or can one file it later.
SUBHASH SHARMA
30 August 2009 at 21:22
ONE OF MY CLIENT HAS PRINTING PRESS AT SHAHDARA HAS RECEIVED A SUMMON OF CRIMINAL/FAUJDARI SECTION 61 FROM AMITABH RAWAT D.J.S. METROPOLITAN MEGISTRATE ( MUNICIPAL)-01, KARKARDOOMA, DLEHI.
IT HAS BEEN MENTINOED THAT, YOUR PRESENCE IN COURT IS MENDATORY IN THE OFFENCE OF 416(41). YOU HAVE TO PRESENT AT THE ABOVE COURT EITHER YOURSELF OR WITH YOUR ADVOCATE AS IT IS REQUIRED.
KINDLY SUGGEST WHAT TO DO
SUBHASH SHARMA
ADVOCATE
M-9891338895
monika
30 August 2009 at 21:20
can a person be trustee of two or more charitable , educational trusts/ and can a same person be chairman of two trusts
Rajneesh Madhok
30 August 2009 at 20:08
False case registered and the person kept in illegal confinement REGISTERED CASE UNDER SECTION 107/151.THIS TIME ARRESTED WITH NO OFFENCE.
PREVIOUSLY THE ACCUSED HAD BEEN PENALIZED UNDER PULIC REPRESENTATIVE ACT IN 2007.
Sir,
Cops of Punjab Police detained a person and kept him in confinement. The matter was reported to quite a number of authorities The case was that a person Viz A had helped the old ladies to cast their vote in the last assembly elections held in the year of 2007 by providing conveyance up to the polling booth. In that case the case had been registered against him and him was penalized for Rs. 1,000/-. The case is over.
Now we come to the point. In this parliamentary elections. The said person A became the victim of Punjab Police. The police keep on harassing him, keep on putting him in illegal confinement. The procedure of harassment did not come to end.
The victim (offender in the name of Punjab Police) reported the matter vide E-mails, Speed post to different authorities from Punjab police officials, President of India, Vice President of India, Chief Secretary and all the concerned officials of Ministry of Home Affairs. But in vain.
One day in early hours A was picked up from his house with police force and again kept in confinement. The police replied to the query filed under RTI act that the reasons of taking actions are as under.
PUNJAB STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONCHANDIGARHComplaint No: 8084/9/2009 Present : Complainant Kulwinder Ram with Shri Rajneesh Madhok Report dated 21.8.2009 from SSP Kapurthala has been received through A.D.G.P/IVC-Cum-Human Rights, wherein the allegations of the complainant have been refuted and found false. It is reported that during the Lok Sabha Elections in 2009 there were instructions from the Election Commission that preventive action be taken against all the Bad Chracter persons and those against whom cases were registered during the last elections. Since case FIR No. 29 dated 13.2.2007 was registered against complainant Kulwinder Ram at PS Sadar, Phagwara, during the last elections, he was arrested and produced before the SDM while taking action under Sections 107/151 Cr.P.C. A copy of this order along with a copy of the said report be sent to the complainant for filing the rejoinder by the next date, failing which the complaint would be finally disposed of in accordance with law. Adjourned to 13.11.2009. Date: 24.8.2009 Sd/-“SONI” Justice Baldev Singh Member Now the points to be considered:1. Sec. 107/151 is regarding MINOR DISPUTE of two parties. In this case the convict who had been put behind bars twice and has to get bail has not made any offence. In the last assembly elections he had helped the old ladies of the village to caste their vote by providing transportation in his car. In this offence he had been convicted and had been fined for Rs 1,000 in the 1997. Whether he became law offender and there is a great problem if he scot free during elections and there will be the law and order maintenance problem. 2. Sec 144 is applicable on Law and order problems. Why the person put behind bars and placed in lock up and still the police department says that it is according to the instructions by the Election commission. REPLY OF PUNJAB POLICE SUBMITTED TO THE COMPLAINANT From Senior Supdtt. Of Police, 24/8/2009 Kapurthala, To Registrar, Human Rights Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh !No. : 1770-P Dated 21-8-09 Sub Regarding: Shri Rajneesh Madhok, Nehru Park, resident of Gali No. 2, Railway
Rajadiraja
30 August 2009 at 19:13
Sir,
The woman to whom I was married (Aug.2002) in good faith and not knowing that she was married earlier, took divorce by mutual consent from her first husband (in Dec 2002) 6 months after her marriage with me. I came to know of this in the hospital when a child was born after one year (in Dec.2003). Because I enquired about this, she has not come back to my house and I was forced to file a case for nullity of marriage. After a full dressed trial, the family court decreed the marriage as null and void giving child visiting rights to the father (in Feb 2007). I have paid interim maintenance during the family court proceedings of Rs.4000/- p.m till the date of judgement; which was also not justified and I did not go on appeal for it.
She is keeping the child with her and not allowing me to even see it since birth. Whenever I ask for visiting the child, she and her parents use abusive language and ill treat me and say that the child cannot be seen. As the child will be affected if I take any action, and in good faith that the child should not be separated from mother, I have not made further attempts to see the child nor taken any legal or police action to enforce the visiting rights. She says that she will commit suicide if I do so.
At the same time, thereafter in order to harass me and extract money, she filed a false case during july 2007 misusing the newly enacted Domestic Violence act, 2007 which came into force from Oct.2006, through the local women’s commission, invoking all sections and making false allegations and claiming exhorbitant maintenance and lumpsum amount for her and the child invoking all the sections in the act- economic abuse, right to shared accommodation, etc. Then I was employed as Bank officer and last year I have taken VRS and am now jobless, living with my pension. This I have not informed the court as they may ask me to pay from the terminal benefits that I received- which is my sweat and blood of 26 yrs. The magistrate court without any trial simply awarded maintenance of Rs.8000/- p.m and thereafter I had to go to the high court for quashing the magistrate court order, for which the HC directed me to refer to the sessions court. Accordingly, on my appeal a stay was granted by sessions court on the magistrate court order and I have prayed for setting aside the false DV case filed by her on the grounds that the lower court has given a judgement without giving me any opportunity to adduce evidence and looking into facts. They have submitted various citations of the Supreme court where maintenance is awarded even if the wife has committed bigamy and the husband is drawing only pension.
Please advise me how the sessions court is likely to view the case. Arguments are over and the case is posted for judgement orders.
There is no law to protect men from the atrocities women commit on men and therefore, I am totally shattered.
I have not filed a case for custody of the child (now 6 years)since I may be asked to pay interim maintenance for the child and since I could not able to see the child or befriend the child by visiting it, the custody may not be given to me though the father is the natural guardian. ButI am willing to take custody of the child and take care on my own.Pl. advise.
Rajashekar.
email: virgo5274@yahoo.in
Thyagarajan
30 August 2009 at 18:52
A respondent had filed a wakalath in favor of an advocate and the Judge had given a date for filing a counter. On that day the Judge did not turn up However the case was called by the bench clerk. The respondent advocate was neither present nor any one filed the counter. Next hearing date was given . I had given a petition that the delay in filing the counter be not condoned just because the judge did not tern up. However one court staff told he was advised by the advocate early before the case was called that the counter was not ready. If the counter was not ready should not the advocate file a petition for another date?
Thyagarajan
30 August 2009 at 18:48
A respondant had filed a wakalath in favor of an advocate and the Judge had given a date for filing a counter. On that day the Judge did not turn up However the case was called by the bench clerk. The respondant advocate was neither present nor any one filed the counter. Next hearing date was given . I had given a petition that the delay in filing the counter be not condoned just because the judge did not tern up.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Legal Dictionary Required
R/Members
Will anyone plz provide me legal Dictionary (for downloading)Thanx in anticipation