Dr.Mumbiram
21 August 2009 at 08:11
Our Writ Petition in the Bombay High Court had prayed for a Writ from the High Court to the visa officials to immediately process and grant visa-extensions that we had applied for three years ago. We had also prayed for compensation for violation of our fundamental right to get equal treatment under law, exemplary damages and legal costs of the writ procedures. Upon the intervention of the High Court the officials immediately granted us the requested visas.The High Court, however, disposed off our petition saying that we were granted our visa requests and that we could approach the Civil Courts for compensation.
We wish to approach the Supreme Court with a SLP to set aside the High Court’s order and grant us compensation as public law remedy for violation of our constitutional right, to levy exemplary damages on the violators of our rights to deter future further violations and to grant us legal costs.
According to the guidelines set by the SC in the M.C. Mehta vs. Union of India Case, we deserve compensation under writ jurisdiction as the violation of our right was ex facie glaringly obvious and incontrovertible. Further it is unfair to expect foreign nationals on a limited visa in India to pursue lengthy civil court proceedings against visa officials to obtain compensation. The High Court, in effect, failed to defend the constitution of India by allowing those who violated our fundamental rights to go scot-free. The HC also failed to give victims of the violation requisite relief such as Article 226 expects it to deliver to the victims.
1) How do we get the High Court’s permission to make the SLP ?
2) What are the time limits ?
3) How do we get Human Rights NGO’s to support our efforts ?
Ramachandran
21 August 2009 at 07:06
There are around 2000 Advocates in the court and also in Supreme court who got their Post Graduate degree through open University and studied law and practising as advocates.
if yo go further there may be judges too who might have retired by now!
There are more than 10,000 officers holding these degrees and occupying the seats.
As per Government of Tamil nadu order of Recognition
Letter No 94873/H1/91-1 Education (HI) Department dated 17th Dec 1991 quotes that since the Annamalai University is recognised by the UGC and hence the degrees awarded by the university is automatically recognised by the Government.
Again in its letter No 11698 /R/91-1 dated 29th Feb 1997, the same Education Department confirmed that the Post Graduate degrees awarded by the Annamalai University under open University system is recognized.
Based on this Annamalai University offered various Open University, there were millions of people admitted and appeared for the exam. And most of the bank staffs also got through.
Now my question is when this Government of Tamil Nadu recognized this P.G., how the UGC can disqualify the PG offered under open university is UN valid?
Does the Government and the Annamalai University had any under table understanding?
Now what is the future of these students who wasted two years with money? Now they are on streets.
The supreme court should first analyst the side effects and tell the students a remedy who had completed the PG under open University.
Will the Chief Justice and Education Department come forward?
Regards
Ramachandran
ABC.......
21 August 2009 at 01:20
A house property is owned jointly by a father and a son equally. Father holds power of attorney to sale, renovate etc. Can a property be transferred in fathers name just by giving an advertisement in newspaper.
Md Shadab Ansari
21 August 2009 at 00:37
An army man is sending obscene mails n scraps to a girl who is also from army.How the girl prosecute that man?Can he be prosecuted under Information Technology Act and IPC.Are there special procedure for them?Is civilian laws applicable to them?Please give me detail how to prosecute him?Thanks
Jolly Shah
21 August 2009 at 00:06
My client is a businessman dealing in SMS business over internet and having very good market for his product. People visit his website and buy SMS pack of their choice. He is visionary and now has developed a unique software which gives user offnet SMS pack to be used to market one's own products.
Whether (1) My client, (2) SMS Receiver, (3) Customer of my client, or (4) Mobile Service Provider - is liable for anything within Business Law, Civil Law or Criminal Law or any other statute for any kind of damage that would be occure to SMS receiver. (may be wrong SMS or non-interested or harrassing SMS etc)
Shahid Naseer
20 August 2009 at 23:16
Sir,
Please inform me that as per Mohemmadan law how an inherited property from our mother is to be divided between three brothers and one sister ( father has already expired) and mother did not leave any written will. Please substantiate your reply with explicit and details of case laws, if possible. Thanks.
Shahid Naseer
PRAKASHCHANDRA MARU
20 August 2009 at 22:55
hello all learned experts
a client came for the formation of the proprieter deed of company pls send me if u have thanks in advance
Sumir
20 August 2009 at 20:05
What is actual (legal) fees chargeble for notorising a document by notory? are affidavit and notorising the document same.
AMIT KARIA
20 August 2009 at 18:10
There is a delay of more than 7 months in registration of one agreement, Hence, instead of paying the penalty of 10 times the registration charges, I'm planning to execute a Deed of Confirmation & attach the original documents to this deed after 8 months from the date of execution of the agreement.
Please guide on the charges to be paid for registering the "Deed of Confirmation"
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
PNDT ACT
A notice was issued by me under section 28 of the PNDT Act to Appropriate Authority to take action action agaisnt the doctor who voilated the provision of PNDT Act and according to section 17(4)(C) of PNDT Act the CMO is duty bound to investigate the complaints but no action was taken by CMO on the notice given by me. Whether I can file criminal complaint under section 25 against the CMO for voilating the provisin of PNDT Act?