P.S.Subbaraman
25 July 2009 at 21:21
A Plaintiff has filed a suit for specific performance and he has pleaded that under Sec 53 A of Transfer of Property Act he is protected, but as per the recent amendment when possession is given through an unregistered agreement under Sec 17 of the Registration Act the document has to be registered. Will the Plaint suceed in the suit ?
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
25 July 2009 at 20:19
Hello,
All Lawyers.
we all professionals are togather from so many time.and also a helping hand of each other.
in our profession some time we visits to out side courts in all over India,for our legal work.
[but ganraly visiting outer courts is not so easy because there was we feel alone]
so,
due to this reason I have a praposal to all of you.
why we not make a freelancer group.in this group we enrold our name and address (in which place we are working as lawyer)and also our contect no..
sand me the feed back regarding this group.
I AM WAITING FOR YOUR VELUBLE VIEWS AND ADVICE .
[ADMIN'S HELP IS ALSO NEEDED IN THIS MATTER]
munish
25 July 2009 at 18:11
i wish to transfer the goods from Head Office to Branch Office within the state.
Which document required for that transaction.
if any format please provide me.
anson
25 July 2009 at 16:39
i would like to know at what interest money lenders are allowed to give money to public at the guarentee of check
(bank)?
and what are the laws to avoid the public from harrasement from the money lenders?
whether yhe public can go to court for collecting money at over rate of interest?
R.R. KRISHNAA
25 July 2009 at 16:20
Dear friends,
If any lawyer is not paid the charges for the professional services, what could be the limitation period to file a suit for recovering the charges for professional services. I was told that only for recovery of loan or borrowings or lending of money the limitation period is 3 years and I am further informed that for claiming professional charges as stated supra there is no limitation period.
It it true? Kindly refer to judgments or authorities if any.
Pramod Kumar
25 July 2009 at 16:03
Dear Members,
Seek your opinion on the following below facts that is quite interesting.
"A" and "B" enter into an agreement to do a business, the agreement was drafted by "A" and all the clauses were in favor of "A" can be said as unilateral agreeement.
There is a clause in the agreement which says "A" can terminate the agreement with "B" anytime after giving one month notice in writing and WITHOUT CITING ANY REASONS.
1. There is no consensus ad idem as per the essential ingredients of the Contract Act. Since "B" had no other option to do business he signed and is currently doing business.
2. Now "A" is threatening to terminate the agreement.
My question is here
1. Can such a unilateral agreement be changelleged on the ground of consensus ad ideam and protect the interest of "B" from being terminated.
2. Is there any other way to save "B" from being terminated arbitrarily.
Regard,
Pramod
Kiran
25 July 2009 at 15:45
My Grand father purchased a property and after his death my Grand mother made a partition deed on 1966 and my father got a separate property. I have two sisters (married) and asks partition of the property through an advocate. As the property is in such a way that there is no way to be given on partition, only if our living house is removed. My query is
1) Whether there is any law suggest to give the share to my sisters. If not,
2) Whether my sisters can challenge the will made in my name. If yes,
3) Please suggest a way to solve this problem.
allurisivajiraju
25 July 2009 at 15:41
Respected Seniors,
Mr. X gave his fish tank an extent of Ac. 5-00 Cents to Mr. Y for leese of Rs. 15,000-00 per Acre for a period of 6 years. There was written agreement between the both parties but is was not registered.
Mr. Y enjoyed leese agreement fish tank for 3 years and paid leese from time to time without delay and now 4th year is running.
Now Mr. X threatened Mr. y to vocate the fish tank since recently there are abnormal leese rates going on in that area for neighbours fish tanks. Nearly Rs. 35,000-00 per Acre for year.
In the above circumstances what is the option to Mr. Y to protect his right ie. Peaceful enjoyment of figh tank for leese period. Can he get injunction order from the Court against land owner ie. Mr. X that not to interfere in the leesed fish tank up to leese period by filing un registered leese agreement deed for collateral purpose.
Please advise me as early as possible. Thanking you in advance.
Shyam Lal Naik
25 July 2009 at 14:20
Joint Ventures can be in Corporate form(when the joint venture is registered as a company) or can be in non-corporate form(by way of a written Momerandum of Understanding)
My question is, whether the 2nd type of joint ventures are essentially in the nature of Partnership. Whether, the provisions of Partnership Act shall apply to such joint ventures, subject however to, the MOU.
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
sec-498A IPC
sec-498A IPC should be made bailable so far as the relatives of the husband are concerned. it is the duty of primarily the husband to protect the wife from torture. if the wife is tortured it would be presumed that the husband is prima facie responsible and he in no case can escape it. but it is very easy to implicate the husband and the relatives.in such circumstances in case of false accusation at least the relatives may be saved.