Why Hindu citizenz of India protest against the present law of dissolution of Hindu Marriages. Some easy procedure to be adopted by making necessary ammendments in the present law.
Do Hindu brothers think biganmy should be permissible, instead of illegal affairs?
dear sir,
(1)out of personal loan of 1.60lacs, i repaid 60000/- from mar 09 onwards i am unable to repay & my EMI (thro' ECS) is bounced since april 09.Due to financial crisi, I shifted to another state in end feb 09 and didn't inform the bank from whom i took the loan.
(2) also i am having creidt card outstanding dues of 1 lac (card of another bank)which i am not paying since mar 09 due to same situation.
still for about next 3 months i will not bale to repay them.
my question is :(a)in above scenario, what both banks will take actions against me and how ? (b) according to you, what should i do if i don't want to face legal action ?
thanks in advance
regards
anckoor
In a cheque dishonour case, Though the same is tried before the Judicial Magistrate through legal fiction.Sometimes amendment application are required to be filed as to amend the complaint . Is there any specific provision under the Criminal Procedure Code or any cited case laws ?
One "X" borrowed a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- from One "A" and deposited his documents of title. Later when "A" demanded payment for the debt "X" gave a cheque for Rs.5,50,000/- towards full satisfaction of the debt. When the cheque was presented for collection it was returned with an endorsement that "In sufficient Funds". Mr. "A" sent a statutory notice under Section 138 of N.I.Act demanding payment. "X" received the notice and sent a reply that he did not borrow the money he gave the documents to his relative "Y" for his bank loan and MR. "A" got the document from "Y" using rowdy elements, and now used the documents and cheque to unlawfully enrich, and "X" does not has a account in the bank and the cheque issued is not his Account. "X"'s relative "Y" is also one of the debtors to Mr."A". "Y" and his father one year back sent a letter admitting that Y borrowed the debt and debt of "X" also. "A" has sent a notice to the "X"'s bank that the chueque was returned for the reasons insufficent funds and not as signature differs? but x states that it is not his A/c. Bank sent a reply that the Account is a Company cheque and "Y" is the authorised person issuing the cheque. It is Now clear that both "X" and "Y" inorder to avoid their liablity "X" issued "Y's" cheque by puting "X" signature to cheated Mr."A". In the mean time 30 days lapsed and now shall i file a complaint against "X" eventhough the cheque was belong to "Y" A/c or file a cheating case under Sec 420 I.P.C against both X and Y. Advice me in this regard.
R/members
A complaint made before police us 395(robbery)/323/506 ipc etc. by me but police didnot initiate any action against culprits those were named in complaint ,thereafter i filed a crl complaint us 395(robbery)/323/506 ipc etc. before magistrate & magistrate has recorded preliminary evidence in this complaint case i stated names of all culprits in my evidence ,now i want to know what will be the fate of allegation of the robbery as now the case is pending before the magistrate thats why recovery could not be effected of my looted articles, in the absence of recovery court can summon/punish the culprit or not.Thanks
There are many overseas Indians who adopt the nationality of the country where they live. They thus hold foreign passports and need a visa to visit their motherland where they often have very close family, religious and cultural attachments.
The present government has vastly improved the amenities available to this category of people by introducing Person of Indian Origin and Overseas Indians cards that certainly make travel and residence in India far easier, even though to obtain this card is a big hassle.
Even so, a person born in India is liable for prosecution if for example, he overstays his visa.
My question is, does a person of Indian origin have a right to territory, what the French call "droit au sol" and whether a criminal prosecution of such persons is legally and morally right. Because the right of a person of Indian origin to return to his country of birth should be considered a part of natural law.
Sir i have two query regarding ESI.
First is by whom contribution is paid whether it is immediate employer or principal employer?
What is mean by contribution period under ESI
Is Employee State Insurance Act applicable to a factory which is a mine related industry. Are they exempted ? Are there any case laws on the above subject ?
how do court interpretate the law embeeded in decision of court themself and through which method do court develop such law?
rental agreement on stamp paper
Is leave and license agreement on stamp paper valid without registering with government or without paying stamp duty? What if its notarised by legal expert?