yogesh
04 June 2009 at 14:13
Please read the following
"The expression "posts" and "vacancies," often used in the executive instructions providing for reservations, are rather problematical. The word "Post" means an appointment, job, office or employment. A position to which a person is appointed. "Vacancy" means an unoccupied post or office. The plain meaning of the two expressions make it clear that there must be a 'post' in existence to enable the 'vacancy' to occur. The cadre-strength is always measured by the number of posts comprising the cadre. Right to be considered for appointment can only be claimed in respect of a post in a cadre. As consequence the percentage of reservation has to be worked out in relation to the number of post which form the cadre-strength. The concept of 'vacancy has no relevance in operating the percentage of reservation. - R.K. Sabharwal and others, Petitioners v. State of Punjab AIR1995 SC1371"
On the basis of above, I seek the opinion if an individual/applicant who was placed in the waitlisted candidate under Unreserved category. Can Recruitment body transfer the resultant "vacancy" of any individual (who was appointed under Unreserved category) by keeping its seat vacant and later transferred to the Reserved category by debarring applicant rights if the waitinglist panel is having in its validity period
Regards
yogesh
04 June 2009 at 14:08
Please read the following
"The expression "posts" and "vacancies," often used in the executive instructions providing for reservations, are rather problematical. The word "Post" means an appointment, job, office or employment. A position to which a person is appointed. "Vacancy" means an unoccupied post or office. The plain meaning of the two expressions make it clear that there must be a 'post' in existence to enable the 'vacancy' to occur. The cadre-strength is always measured by the number of posts comprising the cadre. Right to be considered for appointment can only be claimed in respect of a post in a cadre. As consequence the percentage of reservation has to be worked out in relation to the number of post which form the cadre-strength. The concept of 'vacancy has no relevance in operating the percentage of reservation. - R.K. Sabharwal and others, Petitioners v. State of Punjab AIR1995 SC1371"
On the basis of above, I seek the opinion if an individual/applicant who was placed in the waitlisted candidate under Unreserved category. Can Recruitment body transfer the resultant "vacancy" of any individual (who was appointed under Unreserved category) by keeping its seat vacant and later transferred to the Reserved category by debarring applicant rights if the waitinglist panel is having in its validity period
Regards
Rajarshi Ghosh
04 June 2009 at 13:17
Company Name: AGPL Pvt. Ltd.(AGPL)
Background of the case: AGPL was incorporated on 20.01.2007. The main object of the company is trading of various kinds of goods. The company has, in the financial year 2008-2009, given unsecured loans to 3 individuals for Rs. 500,000/- each at an interest of 12% p.a. AGPL is neither an NBFC nor did it apply for the registration in the F.Y. 08-09.
Query:
1. Whether there is any restriction under Companies Act or any other law for the time being in force whereby a private limited company is restricted from giving personal loan as stated above.
2. If there is a restriction, under which statute is it
Haridas
04 June 2009 at 12:52
I want to re join LLB course . Now I was age 40. I can ?
Hari
muthusamy
04 June 2009 at 12:18
Two elder brothers of five brothers filed a partion suit against the three younger brothers. Among the three younger brothers two accepted for 1/5 the share of the suit property.The younget among the brothers stated that the property is not for partiton and there was a family arrangement which was already made between the brothers where as his statement was a false one and there is no documentary evidence to prove his statement.
The property is for the 5 brothers by the virtue of a will by the testator.
I hope that when the property is testatory , the family arrangement ,assuming that it is there, is not valid by law. If I am correct , you, learned lawers ,please provide the law for my statement to read it in high court argument.
Another point is one among the younger brother has stated that in the suit property some other propery too was included and he has no objection, if that property was removed from the suit property.
Unfortunately , the magistrate beleived his statement and dismissed the case for the reason that unnecessary properties were included.In reality, no such property was included in the suit property. The case is now in appeal with high court.
I hope that when a "will" is executed, the magistrate can ignore erraneous particulars in the 'will' and must give enough effforts to full fill the intention of the testator.
Please provide the laws necessary to put forward in the high court argument.
manikandan
04 June 2009 at 12:05
Dear Experts, Kindly explain me about Insolvency Petition and how to proceed.
Regards,
Manikandan
Kamal Grover
04 June 2009 at 12:03
We are Advocates in Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh.
I am having two three cases related to Banglore High Court and some family courts.
Therefore I need some experts in different fileds who can become my Partners over there. Plz send me the detial of some leading lawyers if you know anything about Banglore lawyers alongwith contact detail.
We are Internaional law firm, head office in Delhi so many people all over the world approach us for thier cases. Plz also send your concent for association. Plz email me on adv.kamal.grover@gmail.com or contact me on M:09814110005
Ria Nath Puri
04 June 2009 at 11:52
Dear Sir's,
My grandfather purchased a plot under his name in 1980 but paid by my father ( In Cash). The amount to purchase the plot was borne thus; 90%- My father, 5% His Sister and 5% My father's Sister's Brother-in-law.
And my father being the youngest of 3 brothers and 1 sister took a loan and constructed a building housing 2 shops, a office and a hospital on the first and ground floor. The second and third being residences for his brothers, sisters and father.
The loan was paid off by my father on construction of the building. The bank refuses any documents.They claim to have handed over the documents but my father has never been to the Bank to take back the documents.The bank refuses to give in writing any document stating that they have either handed over the original document or misplaced it.
After my grandfather's demise 5 years back, the property card now reflects names of his sons and son-in-law.
How do start the process to get the relevant documents? We have no other property anywhere.My uncles are adamant that the whole place belongs to their father and hence even the hospital should be divided equally.
We don't wish to throw our own kins on the streets nor do we wish the same for us but its like having a pie but no teeth to have it and no good health to enjoy it.
Kindly advice.
Ria
Pramod Kumar
04 June 2009 at 11:24
Dear Members,
Would like to have your insight on the following.
1. Is it necessary while issuing notice for recovery of the money to have interest clause for claiming interest.
2. If there is no such interest clause in the issued notice, can the same shall still be claimed in the plaint being filed with the civil court.
3. If at all we file such plaint will the court deny any such interest to the party.
Regards,
Pramod
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
IPC sec 534
Procutrix was alleged that accused come in my room at night 2'0 clock. he swith on light and caught my Hand. then I shout the accused run away.
Please tell me IPC section 354 and 451 was made out or not?