LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

m.v.n.moorty   08 April 2009 at 09:15

consumer protection act

I am customer of electrolux washing machine which purchased from dealer who failed to provide service within guarantee period. during, the warranty period, the washing machine failed to work, immediately approached the dealer and requested dealer to provide company authorized service engineer. but, the dealer failed to do so. i issued legal notice demanding the service. no response. i filed the consumer complaint in the district consumer forum. company, dealer who failed to appear before the forum. is there any legal decision in support of my case? can you respond? is there any decision in support of my case to show before the district consumer forum?
please respond with proper.

B.B.R.Goud.   07 April 2009 at 19:56

right to live with dignity

as our India is rated as top one ( Rs 15372 Billion Crores as per the media reports ) in black list: highest black money accounts in swiss bank; can we file a case in supreme court or International Court of justice, praying the right to live with dignity under Art 21, by transfering the total black money in to our govt of India account.
Is it possible/practicable? If so how?

Mrudula   07 April 2009 at 12:06

Agreement to Sell in Hindi

Sir

I am in great need of Format of Agreement to Sell in HINDI. KINDLY help me out.

my email id : deshmukh_mrudula@yahoo.co.in


Thanks & Regards
Mrudula Deshmukh

Mrudula   07 April 2009 at 12:05

Agreement to Sell in Hindi

Sir

I am in great need of Format of Agreement to Sell in HINDI. KINDLY help me out.


Mrudula Deshmukh

advocate satya   07 April 2009 at 11:54

new site for lawyers

hi
there is a new platform for lawyers www.indianlawyersclub.ning.com

PRACHI   07 April 2009 at 10:36

recovery suit

After sending a proper legal notice, when can one file a suit for recovery of their money?
Or is there a better remedy?

Shyam Ji Srivastava   07 April 2009 at 08:47

UTTAR PRADESH Stamp Act

Dear Members,

Can anybody tell me IN 1909 HOW MUCH STAMP WAS REQUIRED FOR AGREEMENT IN GENERAL IN UTTAR PRADESH?
EARLY REPLY IS HIGHLY APPRECIATED.

SHYAM JI SRIVASTAVA
ADVOCATE
KANPUR

jawahar   06 April 2009 at 22:59

binding nature

Dear Learned Friends,

In a workmen's Compensation case the Deputy Commissioner of Labour awarded compensation. In that the case of the management is that the deceased was not at all a workmen under the management. In a criminal case filed by the Inspector of factories with respect to that accident, the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate gave a fining that the deceased was not a workmen under the management. Hence the Criminal case was dismissed. That judgement was marked in the compensation case.

My question is whether the Deputy Commissioner of Labour is bound to follow that judgement or not?

The deputy commissioner of labour being a quasi judicial authority has bind by the judicial findings or not? Pls answer with citation as far as possible.

allurisivajiraju   06 April 2009 at 20:58

Marking of Document.

Respected Seniors,

There are two searate cases U/S 138 and 142 of N.I. Act between the same parties one case cheque amount of Rs. 6,00,000-00 ie. case 'A'and another case cheque amount is Rs. 7,00,000-00 ie. Case 'B'.

In the case 'A' the Complainant filed his cheif examination affidavit as PW-1. There in he prayed for marking of cheque for an amount of Rs. 6,00,000-00 as Exibit P-1.

But Court marked by mistakenly Rs. 7,00,000-00 cheque as exibit P-1 in case 'A'. Actually Rs. 7,00,000-00 cheque is belongs to case 'B'.

Now what are the option available to the Comlainant to correct the above mistake. Is it curable one or not.

Thanking you in Advance.

allurisivajiraju   06 April 2009 at 20:56

Marking of Document.

Respected Seniors,

There are two searate cases U/S 138 and 142 of N.I. Act between the same parties one case cheque amount of Rs. 6,00,000-00 ie. case 'A'and another case cheque amount is Rs. 7,00,000-00 ie. Case 'B'.

In the case 'A' the Complainant filed his cheif examination affidavit as PW-1. There in he prayed for marking of cheque for an amount of Rs. 6,00,000-00 as Exibit P-1.

But Court marked by mistakenly Rs. 7,00,000-00 cheque as exibit P-1 in case 'A'. Actually Rs. 7,00,000-00 cheque is belongs to case 'B'.

Now what are the option available to the Comlainant to correct the above mistake. Is it curable one or not.

Thanking you in Advance.