NAMRATA DONTUL
07 August 2008 at 13:16
I am an employee of IT co. I would like to know the eligibility of a woman to avail maternity benefit in an IT Company. Is it 80 days or 160 days? What are the various benefits that she could avail if she is eligible for maternity benefit/provisions.
Jaydeep Kurup
07 August 2008 at 12:23
Does section 54 and sec 56 of the Factories Act contradict each other. Whereas sec 54 states that a worker shall not be employed for more than 9 hrs in a day and 48 hrs in a week, sec 56 states that inclusive of rest hours it should not exceed 10 and 1/2 hrs.
So the company is supposed to pay OT after 9 or 10 and 1/2 hrs.
Please clarify asap.
Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A
07 August 2008 at 07:52
hello dear,
can a 10+2 pass student who is of 16-17 year of age, who has signed the admission form(hardware computer course of jetking infrotrain), in which it is clearly mentioned that that fees is non-refundable, can claim fees refund later on ground that he is a minor and cant contract, so his fee must be refunded, can he do so? because the minors are alwyas sign admission forms. plz guide what to do, for not refunding his fee, as in future other students too take this plea and will demand their fees back.
R.Manivasagan
06 August 2008 at 21:42
I Am for the Plaintiff side.It is suit for Declaration of Title. The 1st Defendant died on 14.07.2007. The 2nd Defendant is one of his son and the 3rd Defendant is his one of the daughters.The counsel for the defendant did not inform about the death of the 1st Defendant. Anyhow immediately after the knowledge we had filed an application on 25.12.2007 to impaled the LRs's of the deceased 1st Defendant (the wife and another son and another daughter). We did not file an application to set aside the abatement for non taking steps within 90 days. Before filing that application I had consulted with a senior Advocate and he advised me that if other Legal Heris of the deceased were already on record, the question of abetment will not arise. so, I had filed the application accordingly, but the Trial Court dismissed our application on the ground that we should file an application to set aside the abetment. Is it correct or shall I file a revision against that order or Can I file a review before the same court. Wether the senior advocates advise is correct or not please answer my query.
Subrahmanyam
06 August 2008 at 19:36
Say the position of MD is expiring in the middle of the year say on 1 Nov 2007, however no action is taken in this regard after that date. He is re-appointed in the share holders meeting conducted after 31 march 2008 with retrospective effect.
1) In such a case what is the law, is the appointment valid,
2)Are the transactions done in between 1 Nov 2007 and 31 March 2008 valid even if they are not specifically ratified
punit
06 August 2008 at 16:01
SIR,
PLZ SEND ME A JUDGEMENTS ON CHQUE BOUNCE CASE I WANT TO RESTORE MY PETITION FROM HIGH COURT. MY CASE WAS DISMISSED BY ACJM COURT FOR NON PRASENTS OF ADVOCATE AND ALSO COMPLAINTENT
sunty
06 August 2008 at 14:53
a 75 years old lady is owner of some land house and shops. she has four child two sons and two daughter all married.she is alive and residing with her doughter, one day her grandson picked her and thumbed some papers after one month she come to know all property is registered with someone else, in this case how can she get back his property.
may be property is the name of her grandson or her daughter in law's name.
hemant
06 August 2008 at 14:50
Is there any law covering the protection of an employee working in a government undertaking who wants to take up small time consulting jobs during his free time without compromising his official duties?
nayana
06 August 2008 at 14:50
i have done my pe2 i need to go for any course relates to law i m serching for the courses which have duration of 2yrs.or pls give any site addrese to find
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
N.I.ACT sec 138
sir
if anyone takes a loan from any bank in delhi and if any cheque of EMI bounces or the person who had taken the loan is not repaying can the bank can lodge a case outside delhi on the pretext that the branch office or the head office is there so they can file the complaint there, is it not harrasment of consumer to face the trial in another city , moreover is there any judgement in relevance to this ?