Ranganath
03 February 2009 at 17:45
Respected attornies, I have filed a petition under 9 of HMA for brining my wife back into my house. Judge ordered counseling sessions during last hearing and she refused for re-union, hbl judge had furhter inquired both of us in his chamber and have ordered another counseling session as she refused in front of the judge too. I am working man and my job demands me to travel out of city. Can I skip next hearing. Will there be anyn reasons asked for my absence. Will my wife ask for any relief or ex-parte. I will be absent only for the next counseling session. Pls clarify
Snehal Mandgaonkar
03 February 2009 at 12:01
I am B.Com LL.B from Mumbai and as I am married to an army man I am moving places all over India. Right now I am at Firozepur Cantt. Please suggest me any firms that can give me online job opportunity.
Ahmad
03 February 2009 at 10:07
Need list of Services which can be taken as cenvat credit for contactor
G. ARAVINTHAN
03 February 2009 at 08:42
Impact of joint family in muslim?
Whether muslim law recognizes joint family property or joint family business?
Can any one say about applicability of joint family concept or joint family property/business with citations?
Mohammad Ali
03 February 2009 at 00:17
Hi,
Need your help to understand onces right of information to obtain aganist a registred trust in my locality.
We have a registred Trust runed by some old timers and this trust run a school too, we some people in this are feel that people in trust are mis approprating the funds and property of trust hence need to take some action. What are our rights being citizen of this area?? can we file a RTI to know the modus opernudi of operation ??? do this kind of trusts cover under RTI act????? please help.
ravi
02 February 2009 at 22:18
WE ARE OPERATING PIZZAHUT RESTAURANT IN A FOOD COURT IN A IT PARK
IT PARK HAS OBTAINED ELECTRICITY CONNECTIONS FROM THE DEPARTMENT AND SUPPLIED POWER THROUGH INTERNAL METERS SET BY IT TO FOOD COURT
WE, AS TENANTS OF FOOD COURT RECEIVES FROM AGAIN FROM SUBMETERS
NOW WHEN THE EB DEPARTMENT RAISES BILL TO IT PARK - IT PARKS RAISES DEBIT NOTE TO FOOD COURT OPERATORS AND IN TURN FOOD COURT OPERATIORS RAISES DEBIT NOTE ON US
FOOD COURT ALONG WIHT EB CHARGES PER UNIT ALSO CHARGED SERVICE TAX
IS IT OK ?
TO MY KNOWLEDGE WHEN EB DEPARTMENT IS NOT CHARGING SERVICE TAX TO IT PARK
WHY IT PARK IS CHARGING TO FOOD COURT AND FOOD COURT OPERATORS IN TURN CHARGING SERVICE TAX ON RESTAURANTS.
COULD YOU PLEASE ADVISE
1. SERVICE TAX APPLICABILITY ON EB SERVICE
2. WHETHER ABOVE CASE IS OK
Member (Account Deleted)
02 February 2009 at 20:10
On 17-01-2008 ( about 18-30 pm ), One of my friend filed his revised return of Income for the assessment year 2008-2009 electronically. Acknowledgement is to be submited to ITO within 15 days time. Acknowledgement was filed on 02-02-09 to concerned ITO.
31-01-2009 and 01-02-2009 being Saturday and Sunday Income tax office was closed, hence could not file the acknowledgement within 15 days time limit.Will it amounts to late filing? At the time of submission of acknowledgement, counter clerk acknowledged with remark 'LATE FILING". Kindly guide me as to whether acknowledgement was filed within time or late?
Tirumalesh sharma
02 February 2009 at 19:53
what is the pro. to file janhit yachika(pil)& how much court fee to file case
Mohamed Ali
02 February 2009 at 17:42
A Sunni hanafi Family partition suit is decreed. As per decree male is entitle for 2/17th share and female is entitle for 1/17th share in the property.
The Decree schedule properties were of two types town property and revenue lands, Court ordered to appoint commissioner to divide town properties and for revenue lands the schedule of revenue properties were sent to respective deputy commissioners office
For survey and partition. As per decree
Final decree petition is filed in 1989 to divide the shares as per decree. For town properties commissioner was appointed and he divided the properties as per decree in the year 1995 and some parties were not satisfied, hence the file RFA and moved to high court and the appeal were dismissed and part of Final decree proceedings for town properties got completed in 1995.
The another part of same Final decree proceedings is till pending for division of revenue lands as per decree,
Some LR�s of one plaintiff who are not entitle for share as per Mohameddan law were brought on record in 1989 along with their other heirs, when petition for final decree proceedings was filed,
Even these LR�s have been allotted share in the town properties for which part of final decree proceedings completed in 1995 in the same pending final decree proceedings. As we were not following the case we did not object till now, But now we have filed a Interlocutory application in the pending Final decree proceedings to strike out LR�s of plaintiff who are not entitle for share,
As the Final decree proceedings for town properties got completed in 1995 and now the only the execution is pending for town properties,
We want to take back the town properties allotted to these LR�s who are not entitle for share, Our advocate says we have to file a separate suit it cannot be done in this pending final decree proceedings of revenue lands as part of final decree proceedings for town properties completed in 1995.
Is it right can we can question in this part of pending Final decree proceedings to take back the town properties allotted to those LR�s who are not entitle for share or we have to file a separate suit to get back town properties.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Clause in Agreement
While vetting an agreement for services, the following clause appeared in it which reads:
The Parties further hereby waive any right to a trial by jury with respect to any lawsuit or judicial proceeding arising or relating to this Agreement.
How far is this clause acceptable?
What is jury here? Is it applicable in India