Praveen Kanungo
27 January 2009 at 22:18
I am great thankful to all of you to promptly reply my query
I had bought a Mobile phone from a reputed mobile retail store on 03/09/2008 at 5:00P.M.
1.) No demonstration of the product was given to me before selling.
2.) The product was sold on the terms that in case of a defect the product shall be replaced within 48 hours ( i. e. 48 hours replacement guarantee) of sale(In addition to manufacture 12 replacement warranty).
(* Note:- 48 hours replacement guarantee provided by retailer its own behalf)
3.) I was told that the product is better than the other reputed products (Like Nokia).
But I discovered the following defects in the product
A) I could not activate the GPRS service.
B) I could not make outgoing calls from the phone most of the times.
C) That the product was nowhere even equal to the other brands like Nokia.
I brought the defects to the notice of the attendants at the mobile retail store within the replacement period of 48 hours. My request to replace the product was turned down. I kept waiting for 3 hours at the mobile shop for the problem to be solved but it could not be solved. I asked the attendants to give a written statement to the effect that in case the problem could not be solved, you would replace the handset even after 48 hours as the delay is caused by you.
I had also sent a 15-days notice to the said mobile shop for replacing the mobile but the same failed to elicit any response.
Some point must be taken :-
1. I purchase that mobile only believed the big brand of Mobile Retailer
2. I believed the 48 hours replacement guarantee provided by retailer
3. The retailer promised to me if any problem persist in mobile like hang, in problem in music, video quality we replaced the mobile with any other brand
4. They could not provide any written guarantee card only say we stay here solve your problem you must believe our brand
5. we had only affidavit of visited consumers to this retail shop regarding above 48 hour replacement guarantee
We had already lodge complaint in district consumer forum in this matter
Please guide us to how I able to fight against retailer?
vinod bansal
27 January 2009 at 20:05
Sir
what is evidentary value of news published in news paper without examing editor or reporter in a criminal case ,plz provide citation if available...Thanks
kk
27 January 2009 at 19:58
We have club in Area and members are from same area
We have reached problems where trustee are ruling club in their own way .one of member tried to take steps against him by gathering majority members to remove trustee , but they suspend him.My query is followed
1>>CAn trustee suspend any members ?
2>>can members remove trustee (without involving court cases)and possible ways to remove them ???
3>>can members remove trustee (with involving court cases)and possible ways to remove them ???
4>>these trustees are not showing true accounts and accounts are manipulated so what steps can be taken against auditor ?
are auditors appointed by members???
5>>If no can members force in manner to get true accounts ???
6>>any other possible questions can be also added by EXPERTS .......
regards
Kausshal Ghedia
Pardeep jagdeva
27 January 2009 at 17:09
i have filled a writ petition against the tax department for a reward of 10% in which i need some jugdments (in this matter a person gave information to tax department about those who avoid to pay the tax after that a search was conducted by the tax department and informer was entitled a reward of 10% on recovery and tax assessed by the tax department and the department has failed to pay the reward.)
Ritu
27 January 2009 at 15:40
conversion of an exisiting unregistered partnership firm to a already existing public limited co, how does it happen?does a sale deed or a takeover deed needs to be executed.
Benefits of registering a firm in Part IX of the Companies Act, 1956?
Reasons for regd a partneship firm
Legal_Query
27 January 2009 at 15:29
Sir,
What are your comments regarding the recent judgment of the S.C. in the matter of
Harman Electronics(P)Ltd & Othrs
Versus
National Panasonic India Ltd.
Dated 12/12/08.
How is it going to effect the cases pertaining to 138 N.I.Act.
Thnks & Rgds
tamilarasibabu
27 January 2009 at 13:35
I need any High COurt /Supreme Court judgement in context of accused should not take the defense of summoning IT returns filed by the complainant necessary to prove whether the said amount is shown in the Income Tax returns(petition filed under Section 243)
In most of the 138 -NI Act this tactis used by the accused side simply to drag the proceedings.
Praveen Kanungo
27 January 2009 at 11:37
I am great thankful to all of you to promptly reply my query
I would like bring some point :\
4.) No demonstration of the product was given to me before selling.
5.) The product was sold on the terms that in case of a defect the product shall be replaced within 48 hours ( i. e. 48 hours replacement guarantee) of sale(In addition to manufacture 12 replacement warranty).
(* Note:- 48 hours replacement guarantee provided by retailer its own behalf)
6.) I was told that the product is better than the other reputed products (Like Nokia).
But I discovered the following defects in the product
A) I could not activate the GPRS service.
B) I could not make outgoing calls from the phone most of the times.
C) That the product was nowhere even equal to the other brands like Nokia.
Some point must be taken :-
6. I purchase that mobile only believed the big brand of Mobile Retailer
7. I believed the 48 hours replacement guarantee provided by retailer
8. The retailer promised to me if any problem persist in mobile like hang, in problem in music, video quality we replaced the mobile with any other brand
9. They could not provide any written guarantee card only say we stay here solve your problem you must believe our brand
10. we had only affidavit of visited consumers to this retail shop regarding above 48 hour replacement guarantee
We had already lodge complaint in district consumer forum in this matter
Please guide us to how I able to fight against retailer?
Thanks for reply
Detail matter is
I had bought a Mobile phone from a reputed mobile retail store on 03/09/2008 at 5:00P.M.
1.) No demonstration of the product was given to me before selling.
2.) The product was sold on the terms that in case of a defect the product shall be replaced within 48 hours of sale and it has a one-year warranty.
3.) I was told that the product is better than the other reputed products (Like Nokia).
But I discovered the following defects in the product
A) I could not activate the GPRS service.
B) I could not make outgoing calls from the phone most of the times.
C) That the product was nowhere even equal to the other brands like Nokia.
I brought the defects to the notice of the attendants at the mobile retail store within the replacement period of 48 hours. My request to replace the product was turned down. I kept waiting for 3 hours at the mobile shop for the problem to be solved but it could not be solved. I asked the attendants to give a written statement to the effect that in case the problem could not be solved, you would replace the handset even after 48 hours as the delay is caused by you. The attendants said that they do not have the authority to give any written statement. Instead of entertaining my problems they kept on humiliating me by mocking at me. Moreover, the attendants did not stick to their words and kept on misleading me. Even after 4-5 rounds of visit to the mobile shop and the service center, my problem persists. Due to this deficiency in your service I am not able to reap any benefits even after spending Rs. 4929/-. The purpose for which the mobile was bought could not be served; rather I had to suffer mental agony due to the indifference of the attendants and the defects in the product. Besides I have suffered physical exhaustion due to repeated worthless visits to the mobilehop in the hope of ultimately getting my money’s worth and a problem free mobile.
I had also sent a 15-days notice to the said mobile shop for replacing the mobile but the same failed to elicit any response.
thanks & regards
Praveen Kanungo
prakash
27 January 2009 at 11:33
Registrar of CHS Freeze Bank accounts and appointed Administrator,Now Society is small with aged ailing members could not make it possible to comply all Laws related query raised by Registrar,and asked Administrator to take care of day to day affairs of the society,Like Payment of Reliance Energy Bills,Watchman Salary .........etc and ensure safety and security of life and property of Sr.citizen as well as other members,but Administrator fail to discharge duties on accounts of reasons best known to him,Kindly intimate What is to be done further,to ensure safety of Life & Property,& get defreeze the Bank accounts.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
taxation pertaining to NRI STATUS
DEAR FRIENDS,PLEASE LET ME KNOW THAT IF A PERSON EMPLOYED IN A FOREIGN COMPANY IS WORKING ON A 3 MONTH CONTRACT DURING THE MONTHS OF FEBRUARY,MARCH AND APRIL.AND IF HE RECEIVES PAYMENT FOR HIS JOB IN THE MONTH OF APRIL(FOR ALL 3 MONTHS) .THEN WILL HE BE LIABLE TO PAY TAX ON CURRENT FINANCIAL YEAR OR THE NEXT FINANCIAL YEAR.LOOKING FORWARD TO AN EARLY REPLY.THANKS IN ADVANCE.