vvrravindra
09 October 2008 at 22:18
I want to know where i could get template of various legal documents like MOU, agrements for sale, builder aggre with land owner for construction of flats ( development aggrem) etc
allurisivajiraju
09 October 2008 at 20:38
Respected Seniors:
In a complaint ( Basing on the dishonour of cheque which was issued by the Accused for partpayment of the promissory note debt) U/S 138 and 142 of N.I.Act the list of witnessess who are scribe and Attestor of the promissory note were not mentioned. But the Managers of the Accused Bank and Complainant Bank only were mentioned as List of witnessess.
Now the Complainant was examined as PW-1. He wants to examine the attestor of the promissory note to prove his debt.
What is the option available to the Complainant to examine the attestor.
salilkumarp
08 October 2008 at 18:26
SIRS,
IN ONE OF MY CASES,ALLEGATION WAS THAT ACCUSED ISSUED ANOTHER PERSON"S CHEQUE TO THE COMPLAINANT IN DISCHARGE OF A DEBT AND HENCE COMMITTED AN OFFENCE OF CHEATING.BUT , COMPLAINT WAS FILED U/S 138 OF NI ACT AND THE TRIAL COURT CONVICTED THE ACCUSED U/S 138 NI ACT.IN THE APPELLATE COURT, MY CONTENTION THAT OFFENCE OF 138 WILL NOT LIE WAS ACCEPTED.BUT THE RESPONDENT ARGUED THAT , EVENIF, 138 WILLNOT LIE, COURT CAN ALTER CHARGE U/S 222(1) OF CRPC FROM, 138 NI ACT TO 420 IPC.
WHETHER ALTERATION OF CHARGE CAN BE DONE AT ANY STAGE ? EVEN AT APPELLATE STAGE ?
PLS ADVISE ME
salilkumarp
08 October 2008 at 18:15
sirs,
facts of my case is that 3 persons were found transporting indian made foreign licquior from pondichery state to kerala state in an auto-riksha.
accused no. 1and 2 were passengers sitting in the back seat carrying the entire contra- band articles.nothing was recovered from the possession of a 3 (driver).excise officals also admitted that they have not seen driver helping the passengers to put the mo in to his auto also.
I AM FOR A 3(AUTO DRIVER) ONLY.
IN THIS CASE, EVEN IF THE ENTIRE PROSECUTION CASE IS ADMITTED, IS IT NOT A3 ENTITLED TO ACQUITTAL ?
I AM TOLD THAT SUPREME COURT HAS MADE THIS POSITION CLEAR IN 1967 STATING THAT IN SUCH CASES PROSECUTION HAS TO PROVE THAT MOS WERE TRANSPORTED WITH THE KNOWLEDGE AND CONNIVANCE OF DRIVER ALSO.OTHERWISE, DRIVER IS NOT LIABLE.
ANYBODY, HAVING THAT PARTICULAR RULING/ ANY OTHER LATEST RULING, REPORTED IN AIR,CRIMINAL LAW JOURNAL. KLT, KLD,
PLS FURNISH
THANKS
Legal Fighter
08 October 2008 at 13:01
A domestic violence case has been lodged against me in which i have file my reply. the case was put for submission of rejoinder but the complainant moved an application requesting the court to direct me to submit documents which i have relied upon in my reply so that they can file the rejoinder. now my question is there such any provision in CRPC for submission of documents before rejoinder? i think its upto me at what stage i want to submit those.. court can't force me to submit those in consideration to rejoinder. pls advice.
K.C.Suresh
08 October 2008 at 05:56
Since the marriage between the parties is dead for all practical purposes and there is no chance of it being retrieved, the continuance of such marriage whether would itself amount to cruelty?
jas
08 October 2008 at 00:03
i belong to sikh family. my grandfather came from pakistan and was alloted land in punjab.he died without making a will.he has 3 daughters and one son(my father).my father transfered this land on his name and got the share written on his name from his sisters as well.we r two brothers.me,my brother and mother stayed away from my father for 15 years.but after 15 years we went back to stay with my father.my father transfered some land on my mothers name.now my parents are selling all the land that was alloted to my grandfather.i want to know if this is my ancestral property as my father states that we never resided with him so we never formed hindu undivided family and so its not ancestral property.so can i ask for my share in it i'm an NRI.ANY FAST TRACK COURTS DO THEY EXIST FOR NRI's
my grandfather passed away when i was 17 years of age
rkchopra
07 October 2008 at 18:45
IFCI (having its registered office at 61,Nehru Place ,New Delhi-110 019),a Public Financial Institution, originally established as a statutory corporation by an Act of Parliament in 1948(15 of 1948) and the first Government Institution converted into a company at the threshold of liberalization by another Act of Parliament i.e. The Industrial Finance Corporation (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act,1993, No 23 of 1993 is for all practical purposes an instrument of the Government Of India(GOI has recently directly extended IFCI loans/grants amounting to more than Rs. 5000 crores spreading over 2002/03 -2010/11)
The Section 8 of the above said Repeal Act explicitly protects the service conditions of the employees. The position was reaffirmed by the then Honorable Finance Minister of India on the floor of Lok Sabha on 3rd July, 1998 in reply to an Unstarred Question No 2786
Now IFCI in gross violation of three decades old policy of following Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) in relation to pay scales, pension and other service conditions, by shifting the cut-off date of revision of pay scales , has deliberately denied its 286 retirees their revised due pension, outstanding wages, medical and other related benefits.
Under the circumstances and based on above facts, what VRS optees (who are mostly senior citizens) can do so that they can get releif in a shortest period without incurring much expenditure. For any further informaion pl contact Mr Handa at 9868338030
Rajaram C Iyer
07 October 2008 at 15:14
Dear Members,
Please give a format plaint for suit for damages
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
arbitration and execution
sir
can a arbitration proceeding if not attended and proceded ex parte, and execution is filed how it can be challanged and what is the remedy to contest?