salilkumarp
28 September 2008 at 12:10
sirs,
my client has taken a panchayat buildig on rent basis for running a tea shop.he was paying rents regularly. but since it was on loss, has no option but to close the shop.
so he closed the shop and went away to his native place, which is far awy, in another district.
now the panchayat secretary has initiated both civil and criminal proceedings against my client who has done nothing wrong except due to ignorance,he has not completed the procedure of closing tenancy with the panchayat.
now arrears of rent are accumulating month by month,even when he is not the tenant actually.( not in legal sense).
now even if i do some thing such as sending lawyer notice etc. eventhen i cannot do anything for the past period for which also he was not the tenant actually( but legally can be intrepreted to be )
what can i advise my client to do
salilkumarp
28 September 2008 at 11:50
in 392 ipc case , the allegation is that 2 accused persons came in a bike and snatched the gold chain which the complainant was wearing.
i am appearing for both the accused
now i want to release vehicleby filing the 451 petition.
i have the valid documents to show that the said vehicle belongs to accused.
my doubt is that if i file 451 petition at this juncture, whether it will result in drawing a strong inferance that accused themself have committed the offence.
so,is it advisable to file 452 petition, after the conclusion of the trail.
pla advise me
jayachandran
28 September 2008 at 11:04
Hi
Anybody inform me, whether there is any decision by a High Court or Supreme Court under the Micro,Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 200
jayachandran
28 September 2008 at 11:00
A wife ran away with her paramour on the next day of her marriage and later filed divorce petition and the same was ordered exparte.
My question is "whether the husband" is a "divorced" person or a to be called as "single". What is his status in the society
allurisivajiraju
27 September 2008 at 21:52
Respected Seniors,
In a civil case after obtaining decree the DHr attached the the amount which was pending in the hands of Garnishee which was belongs to the JDr.
After that the DHr filed a petition for sent for the attached amount to the Court. After receiving the Notices from the Court the Garnishee not sent the said amount to the Court. Eventhough there are 5 remainders sent the Court to the Garnishee to sent for the said amount to the Court.
Recently the DHr filed a Petition against Garnishee U/S 2 (b) of Contempt of Courts Act, before the Senior Civil Judge's Court since the matter was pending before the Senior Civil Judge's Court for willfull disobdience of the Order of the Court by the Garnishee.
But the said petition was returned with an aendorsement " this Court has no jurisdiction to try the Petitions under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act.
Now what is the remedy to the DHr. If any decisions for the jurisdiction of Senior Civil Judge to try the above said petition please refer the same.
Thanking You Sir.
shantilal k. patel
27 September 2008 at 14:31
Dear Friends,
Can a member delegate the voting right to any other person in the election of the
managing commettee members by General Power of Attorny?
If no why?
s.k.patel
sandhya
27 September 2008 at 14:17
Hi, Could anyone help me the laws appplicable to expansion of dealership network in India?
Thanks,
Sandhya
advocate satya
27 September 2008 at 13:30
friends,
the whole legal battle is been played by ld. lawyers of the society, advocates holds a respectfull position in society and called officers of the court, still policemen are the power to have red light on there vehicle, why can't lawyers as they are the pillars of judiciary, can this suggestion be made to the bar council or a PIL is required to get the right of red light over there vehicles too ?
advocate satya
27 September 2008 at 13:15
sir
if the opposite party asks an adjourment of the case to another date due to some cause what is the minimum cost the judge should impose as per the consumer protection act? is is minimum 500 as my knowledge is concerned as per the act?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
anticipatory bail in 138 cases inwhich warrant is pending
sirs,
as everybody knows, anticipatory bail can be moved only in cases where the offences are non-bailable and there is apprehension of arrest.
here, in a 138 ni act case,accused failed to appear before the court on receipt of summons ,long back in 2006.now warrant is pending against the accused and 82 83 crpc steps are already taken.now the accused wants to surrender before the court.but,on , that when an accused is surrendeing in a LPC case ,even if it be in minor offence like 138 case, there is every chance o f court remanding him to judicial custody at least for one day.
to avoid this, accused wishes to file an anticipatory bail application in district court.
here my doubt is:
whether an accused can file an anticipatory bail application in a 138 ni case (bailable offence)in which non-bailable warrant is pendiding and accused is apprehending arrest ?