ANAND SUMAN
26 July 2008 at 16:18
Dear All,
For the purpose of Trade Mark infringement case, I would like to ask question on following facts:
A company of U.S. imports some goods from india and used to distribute in U.S. The Indian Exporter exports the goods to the said U.S. company infringing the trade mark of an indian company. Now the U.S. company applies for registration of the said goods as its trade mark in U.S. Will the U.S. company get the registration?
It is also important that the said Indian company has obtained Injunction order from High Court against the Indian Exporter.
surekha N Shetty
26 July 2008 at 15:47
respected all,
I want the format of deed of leave and license. please provide me the same as soon
jhanvi
26 July 2008 at 11:18
Dear Srinivas,
Thanks for the advices , As discussed earlier the bail have ordered jointly for both the guys with the deposit of 6 Lakhs Rs. Now the issue and query is how if one of the accuse is able to make the arrangement of 6 Lakhs can we appeal to the highcourt to release one of them as the order is released jointly. Require your advice in it.
Regards,
Jhanvi
KamalNayanSaxena
26 July 2008 at 00:48
What's the period of limitation to publish notice after taking possession of secured assets U/S 13(4) of the Act.
Please provide citation
K.Ravichandren
26 July 2008 at 00:14
Is there is Central Excise Tribunal in Chennai? where is it? How to file an appeal with them against the order by Salem Office which assessed wrongly.
MUNEESH DHAWAN
25 July 2008 at 23:43
Dear Friends, my client is a manager in a pvt bank in delhi..he has received insider trading violation letters, first letter states violation of code for first time for shares bought & hence warning letter issued..second letter states second violation for scrips sold which were bought in same April month, hence warning letter,accompanied with Rs. 1000 as fine with forwarding his name to audit committee of the bank as well as SEBI.
It is pertinent to mention that he has not bought or sold scrips of that bank or its group companies but as per bank’ s code he has violated the norms/policy as amount of trading exceeded 10 lacs though that was margin trading. My client has been trading into shares since three years much before joining bank (he joined in Dec 2007). He was completely ignorant of the insider trading policy & trading was carried out in complete ignorance of the rules/policy..mails were sent to all employees by bank regarding this policy but were not read by my client.
First/second violation as per bank was buy/sale respectively of same shares in April and bank will surely treat continuous viloations (3rd,4th, 5th etc.) whereas my client was intimated about April violations on 8th July (violations of May are yet to be intimated)..all transactions happened in April (for which 1st n 2nd violation notice) and May (for which 3rd violation notice is expected)
Now he is expecting third violation letter also which states as policy termination from the bank..my client first got information regarding his trading from bank on 8th July ... and thereafter stopped trading in shares since then...however bank will consider violations of policy since he joined bank irrespective that mail was first sent regarding his trading on his demat account on 8th July...they ought to have intimated then and there in April when first violation happened rather then in July till when it was continuing.
Please suggest what to advice my client so that he is not terminated and that too for his ignorance which was unintentional..to add last point that there were net loss arising from the transactions and no profits accrued
Anand
25 July 2008 at 23:41
Dear Legal Experts
Whether a society registered under West Bengal Registration of Societies Act can be construed as operating under commercial laws?
Thanks and Regards,
Anand
MUNEESH DHAWAN
25 July 2008 at 23:37
Dear Friends, my client is a manager in a pvt bank in delhi..he has received insider trading violation letters, first letter states violation of code for first time for shares bought & hence warning letter issued..second letter states second violation for scrips sold which were bought in same April month, hence warning letter,accompanied with Rs. 1000 as fine with forwarding his name to audit committee of the bank as well as SEBI.
It is pertinent to mention that he has not bought or sold scrips of that bank or its group companies but as per bank’ s code he has violated the norms/policy as amount of trading exceeded 10 lacs though that was margin trading. My client has been trading into shares since three years much before joining bank (he joined in Dec 2007). He was completely ignorant of the insider trading policy & trading was carried out in complete ignorance of the rules/policy..mails were sent to all employees by bank regarding this policy but were not read by my client.
Now he is expecting third violation letter also which states as policy termination from the bank..my client first got information regarding his trading from bank on 8th July ... and thereafter stopped trading in shares since then...however bank will consider violations of policy since he joined bank irrespective that mail was first sent regarding his trading on his demat account on 8th July...they ought to have intimated then and there in April when first violation happened rather then in July till when it was continuing.
Please suggest what to advice my client so that he is not terminated and that too for his ignorance which was unintentional..to add last point that there were net loss arising from the transactions and no profits accrued.
sanman ayachit
25 July 2008 at 20:36
What is the concept of law firms? what the new commers can do in improvement of profession with the help of concept of law firms in taluka court places?
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
maintenance
whether a wife who have been divorced on mutual consent of her, on the basis of customary law is entitled for maintence