vineet advocate
24 October 2009 at 20:32
whether a civil court has jurisdiction in electricity matters? if yes what is the AUTHORITY against B L KANTROO'S JUDGEMENT?
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 20:08
Dear sir,
I want to know about the above subject in details whether first year life insurance premiums can be collected in installments or not personally from customers under certain schemes? Helping them to purchase the policy in parts, as when the customers tooks the policy by paying the balance amount in full, giving them an opportunity to earn more out of the commission the respective agent will earn that he will distribute the same ahead through the respective scheme of his.
please answer, my email id is sasankar.boruah@rediffmail.com
thanking you
sasankar boruah.
Selvam Perumal
24 October 2009 at 20:04
Dear Sir,
I am expecting your kind clarification on the following issues:
1. In a Contract for Employment the Staff wantonly committed a breach of Contract and failed to come for duty as such the employer had issued a notice under Section 75 of the Indian Contract Act for rescinding the contract and now he is intending to file a suit for damages as against the Staff for the loss caused by the staff.
2. But in the said Contract there is no Clause stipulating for damages in the event of breach of Contract, so under these circumstances whether a suit for damages will lie?
3. Since no penalty clause is stipulated in the Contract as such is there any yardstick available for ascertaining the “quantum of damages”?
4. Furthermore the Contract was not written in the Stamped Papers but it was written in the Plain white papers and signed by the Staff. Whether such a Contract is maintainable under law and whether it can be impounded during the trial stage?
Kindly advise me in this regard.
yogesh
24 October 2009 at 20:04
Please inform what is the meaning of final synposis.Is it the part of rejoinder? or for concluding submissions of any trail???
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 19:56
i have given a cash amount of Rs.35000 to a person without having any record or receipt for the same. now he has given me cheque of a bank which is neither bounced and not cleared in my account till date. the complaint has been filed with a bank about the cheques.
now question is
if cheque is bounced what action i can take legaly.
can he stop the cheques. if yes than what should my next step.
would i will get my money back.
Member (Account Deleted)
24 October 2009 at 19:40
In our country for every law there is a remedy. Due to fundamental rights provided in our constitution several culprits are escaping from law or prolonging cases in the court. Due to hierarchy system in judicial from lower court to Supreme Court culprits are taking advantage. One court, final judgment. No appeal should not permit to higher courts except in death sentences.
Please comment.
madhan raj
24 October 2009 at 18:41
1 )My great grand father died in 1950. my grand father died in 1992 he was only son of My great grand father. My father was born in 1943 and he died in 2003 he was only son of My grand father. my father have three sister all married before 1970. I have one younger brother and my mother.
my grand father died in 1992 I came know 2005 act does not apply. Because he died prior to 2005 act.
2) my father being born prior to 1956 act he was only son of my grand father and my grand father was only son of My great grand father. I came to know that there is only son law by which my father get all of my grand father share or half of my grand father share another half divided among all his heirs. I want to know which is correct and from ware I can get to know only son law and any citation which I can get.
Please help me.
madhan raj
24 October 2009 at 18:39
1 )My great grand father died in 1950. my grand father died in 1992 he was only son of My great grand father. My father was born in 1943 and he died in 2003 he was only son of My grand father. my father have three sister all married before 1970. I have one younger brother and my mother.
my grand father died in 1992 I came know 2005 act does not apply. Because he died prior to 2005 act.
2) my father being born prior to 1956 act he was only son of my grand father and my grand father was only son of My great grand father. I came to know that there is only son law by which my father get all of my grand father share or half of my grand father share another half divided among all his heirs. I want to know which is correct and from ware I can get to know only son law and any citation which I can get.
Please help me.
meenu katuria
24 October 2009 at 18:06
When challenging a quashing order of the High Court in the Supreme Court of India, what will be the correct term - overturning the quashing order or setting aside of the quashing order or something else?
Naman Joshi
Ist Year,
Law Student
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
casual
Sir/Madam
Please give me your views in the issue mentioned below:
we sent a letter of acceptance (LOA) to an agency on 8/7/09. the contract is for supply of materials and the validity of the offer is upto 11.07.09. the LOA reached the address of the agency on 10.07.09 but could not be deliveder by the postal authorities since the door of the agency is locked. The letter was delivered to the agency on 15.07.09 (after the dste of validity). The delay in delivery of LOA is not due to our administration but only due to the agency. Now the ageny has refused to accept the LOA since it ia time barred. A risk & cost tender was floated and the order was placed to another agency. we tried to recover the risk amount from the defaulted agency but the agency has issued a legal notice stating that they are not responsible for the delay caused and cannot pay the risk amount. under this circumstance plesae give me suitable suggestion to recover the risk amount.