LCI Learning
Master the Basics of Legal Drafting in All Courts. Register Now!

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

bhavana   03 November 2009 at 12:45

petition against central govt recruitment process

Hallo!I have given an exam conducted by ESIC model hospital indore. I was passed in written exam and five candidates were selected for the final interview out of them I had produced 32 enclosure and had the best track record amongst them. After 15 days of interview Dainik Bhaskar in its sting operation discloed a bribe case for this particular exam but for other post( i have applied for the post of medico social worker)and also I haven't selected for the post. My question is that how to apply for stay against this in the court and where?

Anonymous   03 November 2009 at 12:13

Property located in village of Tamilnadu has Will

My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law

Ram   03 November 2009 at 12:12

Property located in village of Tamilnadu has Will

My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law

Ram   03 November 2009 at 12:11

Property located in village of Tamilnadu has Will

My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law

Ram   03 November 2009 at 12:10

Property located in village of Tamilnadu has Will

My Father in-law has property is in Tamil Nadu at interior village and died on the year 2000 after made all settlement thro' registered Will in which he has authorize to enjoy the all properties to his three sons leaving 2 daughters mentioning in Will that he had settled his 2 daughters by the way of cash and jewels during their marriages held all before the year 1989( i.e. year HSA amendment 1989 in Tmail nadu). So father in -law has indicated in his Will that no property was assigned for his daughters. The year of Will register is 1990 before which all sisters were got married. These property is in a Tamil Nadu. Regarding this property, my Father-in-law has acquired in his hand from his father by way of registered Will after dividing the 50% of his property( schedule B property) to my father -in-law and another 50%(schedule A property) to elder brother of my father -in-law and both families are not a joint family and resources were not put in common hatchpot. Please clarify whether daughter become co-parcener for these property or not as the act came into effect in Tamil nadu only on 1989 and 2004 in whole country. As per 1989 act in TN, married daughters are not coparceners . As per act 2005, all partitions and testamentary dispositions occured before 2004 are all valid. Also these two amendement act are only applicable two joint family. In this scenario, please my wife ( daughter) can claim the property right or not.
Now all property were in the name of her two brother only.
please confirm with applicable law

Himanshu   03 November 2009 at 11:44

Motor Vehicle Law

Is it nessessary as per the law to have cleaner or assistant with the driver of heavy motor vehicle like truck, tempo or bus and if yes then under which act or rules or section number. Please give details of any one applicable state or city, we use our trucks all over India. Please Advice.

suraj guha thakurta   03 November 2009 at 11:24

gift deed

sir, is it possible to make a gift with a condition, i.e. the donee can't sale it in future? if not then how i can restrain the donee from sale...

K.Ravichandren   03 November 2009 at 11:00

Law, rules &formaltiei for Online trading, Advertising

Can anybody suggest me the Law, rules and formalities(including any registration/Licences to be obtained) for the initiation of an online trading and advicertising company?

Prathamesh   03 November 2009 at 10:25

Can the booking amount be forfeited

Hello,
In September 2009 i did a apartment booking in Alibaug by paying a token amount of Rs. 51,000/- (by cheque). However later when the time came for getting the property registered the clauses in the agreement where not acceptable to us as the same where in favor of the builder/developer. Hence we decided to exit from the project and requested for the refund of 51000/-. However the developer says the token will not be refunded as the receipt for 51k has a clause about the same. Does the law permit the developer to forfeit the booking amount by just placing a clause in the receipt? Please could you advise what course of action can I take for getting the refund? Also do let me know if any additional information is required.

Anonymous   03 November 2009 at 10:22

procedure befor / after bail

What is a procedure once a bail is given or rejected in sessions court.If the appealent moves to HC, can the police arrest him in between? Can he seek relief under any circustances to avoid arrest?
What could be the time frame of judgement in sessions court Or HC for A /B?
The complain is under sec 467, 468, 407, 420 112 - B etc.Today is he 40th day since the complain is been lodged.