Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:48
Dear Experts
I am being cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
Now what should i do?
Dhanesh
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 10:39
I am having a registered will in my name given to me by my grandmother who is a co-owner of the property, I am currently in possession of. Both my grandmother and grandfather, the property owners have died . My father and and his brother are fighting a case in court over the succession. What is the best thing to do for me in this situation. The registered will in my name is the last testament of one of the co-owners of the property.
Dhanesh
24 October 2009 at 10:39
Dear Experts
I am cheated by two companies. one is my own bank and other is that company with which i have my demat account.
I issue a cheque to India Infoline Ltd. (IIL) of Rs.5000/- to give credit to my Demat account on 09/07/2009 from my saving account in Axis Bank. The said cheque was passed from my SB account on 11/07/2009 and the amount was debited. But IIL people are saying that they not received the credit.
now what should i do?
Dhanesh
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 10:34
Of course, the consumer protection act 1986 provides for consumers to approach Forums to get compensation for deficiency of service on part of institutions. The foras are flooded with cases. While the institutions have their legal wing to deal with cases, the consumers are to either employ advocates or plead by themselves. To protect the name of the institutions its authorities will go from post to pillar up to Supreme Court. Delay in delivery of goods by carriers like plane/ship by 15 days at the destinations seems to be a minor thing. If items involved were life saving medicines etc taking the institution to task may be justified. In my case I took a builder to fora as there was delay in completion of a cottage by a decade. While the fora decided the case in my favor only on later date I came to know the builder did not take the basic site and plan approvals from the local authorities. I had to get them on my own accord. When I approached the fora again to make the builder stand for the cost it rejected my petition on grounds that I am bringing new issues not discussed in main case. The order in main case instructs the builder to complete the ‘construction’. How can the same fora make its own interruption of the meaning of ‘complete the construction’ to say it does not cover procuring necessary plans?
No institution takes orders of fora seriously. Appeal after appeal is made. It is time the Act is amended to give a reasonable meaning to the word ‘deficiency of service’
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 09:40
Respected Sir,
I have purchased flat at Kolhapur with HDFC Bank housing loan. Stamp duty ragistration and Agreement to sell done.Possetion letter given by the builder.Now i want to sell this flat but buyer wants Sell Deed which is not possible as completion certificate not done by builder although all flats / shops occupied. How can i do this transection easily to sell this flat,Builder is delaying for Sell Deed. Please suggest me the easiest procedure to sell this flat as Buyer is ready to buy now. Kindly reply urgently or contact me on cell no 9850985011.
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 02:03
Respected sir,
As i asked yesterday that my wife remarried the other.and our first marriage was love marriage and i had the following evidences regarding the case.please tell me whether the following are enough evidence or not according to HMA ?
1.photos and negatives of our marriage (not registered or no certificate from temple)
2.while desserting or leaving me she filed a complaint against me and my parents (DVC) which was not registered in p.s but
2.a GD Entry certified copy of complaint which is numbered and
3.a certified copy of complaint in which she specified i'm her husband and signed in that.
4.while i filed a complaint on CI for harassing me with false cases the hon'ble court directed the matter to DSP which he gave in writing that marriage has taken place and she accepted that.
5.she filed a 498-A on 2nd husband in which the SI gave final report that she was already married with me and lived together with me for 3 months.
6.Court's injunction order based on photographs.
few more evidences.Are these worth for proving that she got married with me and valid marriage ?
Thanks for your previous reply and thanks in advance.
Anonymous
24 October 2009 at 01:08
Dear Sir/ madam,
The owner of the private road is asking to close the window facing to his private road. The windos are non openable sealed with semi transperant glass. the builiding is commercial building and having only 6 inch of free land facing private road.This private road is registered in village panchayat.
Please suggest me if i lodge the legal complaint againist him in court is there any possiblity to win.
With Best Regards
Sheetal
debasis MANDAL
24 October 2009 at 01:07
If a person made a Deed of Agreement for sale of his property having valuation of Rs.600000/- on a Rs 100/ stamp paper and if the Deed of Agreement is unregistered and is concluded before the Notary and partial amount of total payment of money has already been done and is recorded in that Deed of Agreement,then can the person withdraw from that Deed of Agreement by paying the amount he has taken?
If the answer to the above is affirmative then what should be the way to restrict himself ?
Sumit Lal
24 October 2009 at 00:18
Respected Seniors and Experts.
In the trial under N.I.Act, I being the defence counsel could not attend the Court due to illness and I filed an adjourment petition on the ground of my illness. Adjourment was allowed subject to payment of cost but at the same time, the court examined the complainant in chief and marked the documents as exhibits and posted the case to two days after for cross examination. On the date fixed since I had not recovered from my illness, I again filed a petition for adjourment on the same ground. The Ld. Magistrate rejected my petition, discharged the complainant and posted the case to next day for accused statement. I have filed a petition under Section 311 for recall of the witness for cross examination.
I request the experts to advise me on the issue supported with case law.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
reluctant to dispose our I.A
We have a Muslim partition suite pending in Final decree proceedings and is adjourned for 31st of this month, for which preleminary dated almost 1970..
We are LR's of one plaintiff, plaintiff had 3 children two daughters and one son who had predeceased her, but his childrens were wrongly brought on record while filing final decree petition in the year 1989,
plaintiff daughter has filed an Interlocutary application in 2008 to strike out these LR's of predeceased sons children from record as they are not entitle fo share as per Mohameddan law.
Also, In this Final decree proceddings there are 3 non-bonafide subsequent purcahser who has some how been made as parties as additional defendants,
And one of the purchaser has done out of court compromise with some of decree holders except one plaintiff for one of the decree schedule property against the will of lR's of one plaintiff who has objected saying that First the Interlocutary application to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share must be disposed off as there is problem amongs LR"s of one plaintiff must be settled,then any compromise will be entertained by the objecting LR's of plaintiff.
The Honorable court agreed to dispose of our IA to strike out LR's of plaintiff who are not entitle for share and posted our I.A for Orders two hearing back, Now after 2 hearings suddenly Judge is taking a
U-turn and not writing Order on our I.A , further saying he will refer the case to Lokadalat if the parties agreed and try for compromise with subsequent non-bonafide purchasers with out disposing our IA, As per the Judge, as of now tour IA will be kept as it is.., As one of the non-bonafide purchaser is an influential person may be Judge under some influence acting this way,
We are very frustrated, our simple I.A is pending from past 2 years we being Plaintiff , our I.A is not entertained and dispose off, the Judge is more interested in compromising the non-bonafide subsequent purchaser who has no equity as per decree.
We are fed up with this trial court judges atittudes, Can we approach high court as our IA is pending from almost 2 years.