joyce
09 September 2009 at 14:47
does only goa has this as local act or such type of acts exists in other states?riven
RAVI SHANKAR
09 September 2009 at 14:42
Hello Sirs !.
This is Ravi from bangalore., have few querYS related to a flat which have purchased in Dec 2005 , But the builder has not given possession of flat till today i.e., 9 September 09.
Had purchased a builder's share flat in 2005 December and the same was registered in January 06., and the builder was to have deliver the flat by FEB 2006 as mentioned in sale deed.
Have paid the builder a total of Rs25.5 lacks (Rs4.35 lacs as my contribution and obtained a bank loan for Rs21,5 lacs) . The bank has released this amount directly to the builder by mortgaging my flat original documents and Have been paying EMI from Feb 06 till July 09. and have defaulted EMI payment past two months.
The present condition is that, another party is claiming the title of the land and the case is in hearing stage at revenue authorities.and a stay order is in place.
Since 2006 am behind the builder who has a JV with the land lord and he keeps telling me that the case is strong it will be resolved ,., resolved ., with oral assurances only,
Seek your valuable advise on the following :
1.What should i do to get my money refunded or other actions i can initiate to get my money back / flat ?
2.How can i request for a EMI holiday till the possession of the flat ?
3.The bank had scrutinized the titles etc ., ( had paid processing fee to the bank ) then only the bank had released the money directly to the builder with a tripartite agreement ., how can the bank help me ?.
Thanking you all in advance
Best Regards
Ravi.
riven
Sameer
09 September 2009 at 13:51
i think you remember me, a new controvercy is created in my case.as i had moved the civil suit against him he immidietly came to me for settelment for the 138 case and accordingly i gave him two cheques for three lakhs and he moved an application before the magistrate that he got all money from me and he mentioned the cheque numbers in his application to the magistrate and he is no more interested in continuining the 138 case further.hon magistrate told us that ho high court has given stay in this case so he cannot pass any order in this regard,so you withdraw from the high court i will pass the order,so i withdrew from the high court and the very next day he has moved an application with affidavit that i want to continue the case, on the other he presented the cheque for clearance.what should i do in this regard sir please advice. events: 31.07.2009: he moved application that he had received th two cheques for three lakhs,and he is no more interested in continuning the case of 138 against me. 04.08.2009: i withdrew from high court. 04.08.2009: he presented cheque for clearance and cheque is cleared from my bank account. 05.08.2009 he moved an application with affidavit that he had not received any cheque from me and i am interested in continuing in the case. Please guide what i can do in this regard. will the magistrate continue the case against me. or he will dismiss the case.riven
Adv G V Reddy
09 September 2009 at 13:44
Dear Friends
Would you please sugest what is the registration expenses for registration of rend deed on rent paid Rs 72,000 pm with advance paid Rs 5,00,000, lease period 5 years, jurisdiction at hyderabad AP Indiariven
harsh
09 September 2009 at 13:43
hi
can anybody help me by explaining diff. bet. bl and llb.
what are concequences of doing correspondence course in blriven
Shivank Arora
09 September 2009 at 13:33
Hi, We have a house property in Delhi. Around 1987 we let out ground floor of our house to a tenant on a monthly rent of Rs.125 and security deposit of Rs. 1 Lac. There was no specified duration in the contract. Now We want to reposses our property but the tenant is asking for Rs. 1200000 or property anywhere in Old Delhi. Please guide me how can I proceed with this matter to get our house vacant.riven
Milind
09 September 2009 at 12:30
Dear Sir,
I have purchased a new flat in Pune. I came to know that the builder is trying to do Apartment deed. This builder is one of the reputed builder from Pune. There are total 11 buildings in the scheme. One more scheme is going on of the same builder. But the issue with this another scheme is, there is no enterance for it. Thats why builder wants our road as common to both schemes. My question is:
1. Is it possible for the builder to avoid forming a society? (Because peoples are blindly signing the Sale deed whil taking possession. Can builder mention such a clause in the sale deed so that we can never form a society)
2. What is apartment deed? Can we (I) oppose signing the deed if it is infavour of the builder
3. If i decided to fight with the builder, can i do so? and How?
riven
AROKIASWAMY
09 September 2009 at 11:43
Dear Sir
My client registered in Tamilnadu Employment Exchange on 1996 then he renewed his name based on the Terms. The Tamilnadu Electricity Board asked to give candidates lists to Employment Exchange for those who are finished Diploma Holders & finished one year apprenticeship training with TNEB. The Tamilnadu Employment Exchange sponsored the names of qualified candidates including my client name. The selection committee called for an interview to sponsored names by Tamilnadu Employment Exchange. The selected candidates list published in the net, but my client name not in the list. Shall we file a writ petition seeking revise the order of selection and include the name of my client & give the appointment to my client
1. Basically my client is SC category; Selection is on the basis direct recruitment
2. the selected candidates are beyond my date of birth, I have seniority in the Employment Exchange
3. My client finished Diploma in the year of 1996, but now selected candidates are finished diploma in the year of 2000, 2001 ,2002 2003 2004, & 2005
4. Selection lists consists of Backlog vacancies list & Roaster vacancies list
5. Give Advice to this issue
6. Please give the related case laws for this issue
riven
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Loan to Directors
Sir,
as per incometax disallowed the loan as per provision of sec (2)22 (e)of the act says that is to be treated as deemed dividend.
riven