Avinash kumar seth
28 August 2009 at 19:36
From her office record under RTI Act 2005 they informed me her papers cancelled in November 2002 instead of December 2002 next paper started from 27th May 2003 instead of 27th June 2003 and result declared of these SO Grade Exam on 11.12.2003 not in September 2002 or in November 2003. DW verify this record.
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005 true copy attested by Sh. Chaman Bhandari Sr. AO
(Asha Arya) 20/7/2006
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
Dated: 20.4.2005
The above letter verified by Mr. Chaman Bhandari as Defence Witness
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
The above letter verified by Defence witness one Mr. J B Guta & Mr. Jawahar Lal
I never massage on her abdomen and never threat her for money false aligation on me.
She borrow money from my wife Rs.1100/- and also she use to borrow money from other office colleagues this was verified by the bank statement of the complainant as well as the bank authorities.
Now the case is for final arguments on the above letters can i won the case or not?
Soma
28 August 2009 at 19:29
After filing a divorce suit the wife filed a case u/s 12 of PWVDA..it is purely a false case..PO while preparing the report never inquired and made it on sole version of complainant (it is repetition of complaint)..the case is false and complainant want to create pressure on his husband to withdraw the MAT suit...
What is the remedy to the husband?
Any case law?
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 16:23
Avinash Sir,
In MNC companies. As a legal advisor and consultant. To protect the company legally. To give answers for the suits. I dont know well about that because i have just got enrolled in AP Bar Council.
shankar
28 August 2009 at 15:56
If a private limited company is not filing returns for more 4 years what would be the consequence, pl answer
Arul Kumar
28 August 2009 at 15:30
Dear Experts,
Can a Resident of Kalyan get an affidavit notorised from Mumbai for the Ration Card purpose in Kalyan which comes under Thane Distric?
Thank you.
Arul Kumar
AMIT KARIA
28 August 2009 at 15:24
Hello,
Please provide a draft of the Bank Gurantee to be given by the Parent company for its subsidiary company.
Waiting for your replies,
Thanks
Amit Karia.
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 15:21
Is there any books to get job gramanyayadhikari.
O. Mahalakshmi
28 August 2009 at 15:20
What are the good books to get a legal consultant job in a well established company(MNC)
Kindly suggest me books
Raghu
28 August 2009 at 14:15
Dear Sir/Madam,
I need your expert guidance and advice on the below issue: Thanks in advance.
My Grandfather had left 540 Sq Yard of Land to his 8 sons and 1 daughter.
My Father being 3rd in the number, has purchased 5 other brother's share and 1 sister's share and got them registered.
So in all now my father owns 7 parts out of 9 parts in the 540 Sq yard land.
The other two brothers are not willing to sell their parts nor they are willing to partition the land, and this dispute is running from past 15 years. They are not ready to settle the matter.
In this regard, that can be done by us?
We own 7 parts out of 9 in a 540 Sq Yard land.
Please advice, and guide us in this matter.
Regards,
Raghu
FIR 37/2004 dt. 18.2.2004 u/s 385/384/354 IPC
From her office record under RTI Act 2005 they informed me her papers cancelled in November 2002 instead of December 2002 next paper started from 27th May 2003 instead of 27th June 2003 and result declared of these SO Grade Exam on 11.12.2003 not in September 2002 or in November 2003. DW verify this record.
Smt. Asha Arya registered a case FIR 37/2004 dated 18.2.2004 she was on leave from 11th Feb 2003 to 19 April 2003 after joining her duty she wrote two letter both letters were verified in Defense witnesses because in her cross she denied her signature on the letter and said she was not admitted that she wrote two letter to her office on 20.4.2005 those letters are as follows case is State v/s Avinash Kumar Seth (self)
Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi-110002, without any influence and pressure from any body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated.
Sd/-
20/4/2005 true copy attested by Sh. Chaman Bhandari Sr. AO
(Asha Arya) 20/7/2006
To
Shri V.S. Chauhan
PA to Sr. DAG (Admn.)
Dated: 20.4.2005
The above letter verified by Mr. Chaman Bhandari as Defence Witness
To
The Sr. Dy. Acctt. General (Admn.),
O/o the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi,
AGCR Bldg.,
New Delhi-110002
I, Asha Arya wife of Sh. Satish Chandra, resident of 147-Neb Sarai, New Delhi working as Sr. Auditor in the office of the Accountant General (Audit), Delhi, AGCR Bldg., New Delhi without any influence and pressure from an body disclose that the contents of FIR No. 37/2004 registered on 18.2.2004 at Mandir Marg Police Station, New Delhi are false, baseless and fabricated and the above FIR was lodged by me under extreme pressure and threat to me by my husband. I had no intention to label mean and false allegations on anybody but the pressure and threat of my husband led to all this. As regards misbehaviour with Sh. V.S. Chauhan, P.A. by my husband in the office complex during lunch time on 9.3.2004, I am to state that my husband pressurised me to impose on Sh. V.S. Chauhan false allegations of illegal affairs with me. I did all these things the way my husband wanted me to do. I again reiterate that there is no truth in any of the allegation and these are all fabricated. I apologize to the office and Sh. V.S. Chauhan for my wrong doings and I assure you Sir that such type of things will not occur in future.
Sd/-
Dated: 20.04.2005 (ASHA ARYA)
Witness
1 J.B. Gupta
AO (Estt.) Sd/- 20/4/05
2 Jawahar Lal
A.O. (Admn.)
O/o (Audit) Delhi Sd/- 20/4/05
“Sr. DAG (Admn & A/CS)’’
Dy. No…….62……….
Date……21/4…..
The above letter verified by Defence witness one Mr. J B Guta & Mr. Jawahar Lal
I never massage on her abdomen and never threat her for money false aligation on me.
She borrow money from my wife Rs.1100/- and also she use to borrow money from other office colleagues this was verified by the bank statement of the complainant as well as the bank authorities.
Now the case is for final arguments on the above letters can i won the case or not?