Chetan
22 August 2009 at 20:39
My Opponenent lady advocate made adjournment application on the reason of pregnancy she wants to seek 3 1/2 months period is it possible in the case of 138. If yes is there any provision pls reply
with case laws if any.
the stage of case is the complainants evidence is closed.
WHATSAPP 91-8075113965
22 August 2009 at 19:03
sir,
this is question regarding defences , generally about a criminal case. hence, i, myself know that this is a vague question.still , if any body, tries to explain, it elaborately, WITH ONE /TWO RULINGS OF HC/SC, i would be obliged to you all sirs.
1.delay in loadging a complaint before a police officer, is how far fatal to prosecution ?is there any material things to be noted by a defence lawyer, regarding, this FIS {COMPLAINT}.
2.is the delay of reaching FIR in the court , how far fatal ?
3. what is the relavancy of SCENE MAHASSAR in a criminal case?
usually a defence lawyer says NO CROSS to a scene mahassar witness . is any thing should be asked to him ?
4. when the both seizure mahassar witnesses turn hostile, still conviction can be sustained ?
5. what should be asked to an investigation officer ?
SALILKUMAR.P
ADVOCATE
THALASSERY-670101
09447536929
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
22 August 2009 at 18:25
EXPERTS,
my clint's vehical was full insured that vehical robbery .
the owner has the d.l. but who was driving that vehical has no d.l.
is driving licence nessesory for insurence claim in the matter of robbry?
any case law....
THANKING U
Pramod Pawar
22 August 2009 at 17:12
to an advocate to act as gp or agp at district court how much experience is essential ? also other qualifications helpful to act as gp or agp
SUHAS DAS
22 August 2009 at 16:56
I had taken NOC from Kolkata to Raipur for my bike (yamaha)in 2002, however, i didnt go there. Nither I have cancelled the NOC.
Is it possible to cancell that old NOC and take a new one for another city (say nagpur)?
Life time tax was paid in Kolkata in year 2000.
What is the official charge for this?
Thank You.
Suhas
ad. creaminall
22 August 2009 at 16:32
i wnts to prepare an agreement for sale where in the purchaser wants to avail home loan facility from bank. the purchaser therefore put the proposal that he is making a part payment (an innitial amount) to registered the agreement for sale and after registration of the said agreement he will submit the said agreement to his banker and within 7 days his loan will release by the banker and the payorder will issue directly in the name of seller.
the seller wants to mentioned this fact in his agreement if this offer is proper. whether is it proper to accept this offer of purchaser? if yes then can i put the said term in the agreement as requir by the seller? if you have any draft of the said clause then plz. forward me. it is very urgent. thanks in advance.
vinod bansal
22 August 2009 at 15:00
R/Members
Kindly enlighten me on judicial appraisal.Thanx
vikas kumar
22 August 2009 at 14:57
WHAT IS THE TAX TREATMENT ON RANT PAID IN DUBAI
IS TDS WILL BE DEDUCTED ON RANT PAID IN DUBAI
WHAT WHILL BE THE RATE OF TDS
V.Raghavan
22 August 2009 at 13:41
The fact of the case is:
A (Defacto Complainant/Complainant)buys a car in 2001 his brother's sons (B & C)just take the car for a ride and didnot turn up for three days and after the fourth day they rang up and say due to their urgency they sold the car and they will pay the money in two or three days. A lodged complaint with the police against B & C and the police and Road Transport Office were in search of the car and the B & C. After nearly 5 months with the help of three neighbour state police and Road Transport Offices, the car was traced and its new owner(!) was arrested and from him the address of the B & C were obtained. Warrant taken and arrested B& C and brought him to the court by the police and FIR states the IPC sections 410,411,414,415 & 425 of offences they did.When the case is in its trial stage, the Court transfers the case to 'Lok Adalat' and try settle the matter amicably and the Accused agreed to pay the car sale value with in 3 months and they issue a cheque for the amount. The cheque bounced again the Complainant was in search of the B & C and finally they brought into the court after NBW was taken against them by filing a cheque bounced case(138 NI Act) for their willful default. After some hearings the accused pleaded the court to transfer this matter also to the Lok Adalat along with the previous case pending with them that they intend to settle the matter there itself. Against the intention of the Complainant court transfer it again Lok Adalat for settlement of both the case. There the B & C agreed to pay the cheque amount within 3 months and initially they paid Rs.75,000(for 1,90,000/-) and another Rs.80,000/- was paid in small instalments on the hearings and a balance of Rs.35,000/- is still kept pending even after the completion of 5 years of the transfer of the 138 NI Act case. The Complainant accepted the amount before 6 years that too the accused agreed to pay within 3 months. But even after 6 years the accused did not pay the full amount and they were continuously absent for the Lok Adalt. Finally last month since the complete settlement could not be effected the Lok Adalat remanded both the cases to the trial court. Now in the trial Court the accused represents he is ready to pay the balanace of Rs.35,000 plus another 5,ooo/- and demanding us to accept since the amount was agreed earlier. Now the complainat says since the accused made him to wait for nearly 6 years and even now they did not complete the payment of the agreed amount he demands another 1 lakh or else to conduct the trial of the case. The Proof affidavit filed and documents are marked in both the case. Since the accused admitted their offence(by paying the amount in parts) is any chance of requesting the trial court to pass order without the trial(documents are also marked)? Is there any rule or section in CrlP.C. to demand such. The Complainant is now 85 years old and sick and he may not be able to attend the trial(he is an ex-policeman)? Please advice me
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
pre emption
Hindu person sold 4 shops to muslims. Out of 4 shops, two shops (grounf floor only) purchased by "A". Now the "A" intending to purchase the first floor portion from the owner and issued anotice intimating his intention to purchase the same, if the owner intends to sell the same as per market value. But now the another owner of two shops has purchased the all 4 shops first floor area in sopite of notice of :A:. Now what law can apply for remedy as plaintff and defendant are belongs to Hndu & Muslim. As per HS Act, Mohammad law, if so under what provision. PLease anwer me and if so refer case law. My mail" gclrajender@gmail.com