SUHAS DAS
22 August 2009 at 16:56
I had taken NOC from Kolkata to Raipur for my bike (yamaha)in 2002, however, i didnt go there. Nither I have cancelled the NOC.
Is it possible to cancell that old NOC and take a new one for another city (say nagpur)?
Life time tax was paid in Kolkata in year 2000.
What is the official charge for this?
Thank You.
Suhas
ad. creaminall
22 August 2009 at 16:32
i wnts to prepare an agreement for sale where in the purchaser wants to avail home loan facility from bank. the purchaser therefore put the proposal that he is making a part payment (an innitial amount) to registered the agreement for sale and after registration of the said agreement he will submit the said agreement to his banker and within 7 days his loan will release by the banker and the payorder will issue directly in the name of seller.
the seller wants to mentioned this fact in his agreement if this offer is proper. whether is it proper to accept this offer of purchaser? if yes then can i put the said term in the agreement as requir by the seller? if you have any draft of the said clause then plz. forward me. it is very urgent. thanks in advance.
vinod bansal
22 August 2009 at 15:00
R/Members
Kindly enlighten me on judicial appraisal.Thanx
vikas kumar
22 August 2009 at 14:57
WHAT IS THE TAX TREATMENT ON RANT PAID IN DUBAI
IS TDS WILL BE DEDUCTED ON RANT PAID IN DUBAI
WHAT WHILL BE THE RATE OF TDS
V.Raghavan
22 August 2009 at 13:41
The fact of the case is:
A (Defacto Complainant/Complainant)buys a car in 2001 his brother's sons (B & C)just take the car for a ride and didnot turn up for three days and after the fourth day they rang up and say due to their urgency they sold the car and they will pay the money in two or three days. A lodged complaint with the police against B & C and the police and Road Transport Office were in search of the car and the B & C. After nearly 5 months with the help of three neighbour state police and Road Transport Offices, the car was traced and its new owner(!) was arrested and from him the address of the B & C were obtained. Warrant taken and arrested B& C and brought him to the court by the police and FIR states the IPC sections 410,411,414,415 & 425 of offences they did.When the case is in its trial stage, the Court transfers the case to 'Lok Adalat' and try settle the matter amicably and the Accused agreed to pay the car sale value with in 3 months and they issue a cheque for the amount. The cheque bounced again the Complainant was in search of the B & C and finally they brought into the court after NBW was taken against them by filing a cheque bounced case(138 NI Act) for their willful default. After some hearings the accused pleaded the court to transfer this matter also to the Lok Adalat along with the previous case pending with them that they intend to settle the matter there itself. Against the intention of the Complainant court transfer it again Lok Adalat for settlement of both the case. There the B & C agreed to pay the cheque amount within 3 months and initially they paid Rs.75,000(for 1,90,000/-) and another Rs.80,000/- was paid in small instalments on the hearings and a balance of Rs.35,000/- is still kept pending even after the completion of 5 years of the transfer of the 138 NI Act case. The Complainant accepted the amount before 6 years that too the accused agreed to pay within 3 months. But even after 6 years the accused did not pay the full amount and they were continuously absent for the Lok Adalt. Finally last month since the complete settlement could not be effected the Lok Adalat remanded both the cases to the trial court. Now in the trial Court the accused represents he is ready to pay the balanace of Rs.35,000 plus another 5,ooo/- and demanding us to accept since the amount was agreed earlier. Now the complainat says since the accused made him to wait for nearly 6 years and even now they did not complete the payment of the agreed amount he demands another 1 lakh or else to conduct the trial of the case. The Proof affidavit filed and documents are marked in both the case. Since the accused admitted their offence(by paying the amount in parts) is any chance of requesting the trial court to pass order without the trial(documents are also marked)? Is there any rule or section in CrlP.C. to demand such. The Complainant is now 85 years old and sick and he may not be able to attend the trial(he is an ex-policeman)? Please advice me
kirtirani sole
22 August 2009 at 12:47
Respected Sir/Madam
Could I get the information of the case Lonrho Ltd V Shell Petroleum CO. Ltd -brief facts and principle laid down especially issue related to liability of holding ompany towards subsidiary company in this case or suggest any link related to it.
Thanks & Regards!
Kirti
Rajath Chandran
22 August 2009 at 12:12
Dear Seniors, I have a querry on sale of Car parking slots by the flat promoters.
When we purchase an undivided share of land in the transaction of purchasing a flat in an apartment, I presume that we are sold an undivided share of land. Like this, all the owners of the flat should be sold some undivided share of the land on which the apartment is being built.
Logically, if we put together all the undivided share of the land sold, it should tally with the whole of extent of land owned by the flat promoter (subject to certain extent of land statutorily left).
At this stage, now let us assume that I need to have a car parking within the premises. Most of the promoters are selling parking slots to the intending owners at some rates fixed by them.
My doubt here is that when the individal owners have purchased the whole of extent of land (of course each one purchasing some undivided share), how come the promoter sell again a place for consideration.
I understand that the calculation of undivided share includes this area where the car parking is alloted.
If my question is correct, would like the seniors to suggest their reply. If my assumption is wrong, then pleae clarify how the undivided share is being calculated in apartments.
Rajath Chandran
99464 45067
A Truthseeker
22 August 2009 at 09:28
prevention is better than cure. so, are lawyers' role more important than doctors'?a man first quarrels, then ffights, then gets injured, then treated by doctor.
Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate
22 August 2009 at 09:05
frinds,
my client driving his tractor,sudden four person comes and robbery that tractor.
the tractor was full insured.
my clint has no driving licence .
without driving licence can he claim his insured sum?
is there any need of driving licence on the matter of robbery case?
any case law regarding this ....
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
about gp and agp
to an advocate to act as gp or agp at district court how much experience is essential ? also other qualifications helpful to act as gp or agp