Dear Sir or madam
We have a query, and seek your kind guidance on the matter if possible...
We have a flat in our building where in the flat has two names in the agreement
1) Maternal Aunty (mothers sister)
2) niece
The niece is planning to get married shortly and wants to retract her name from the society records by mutual concent and without any monetry benefit or otherwise etc.. she wants to subrogate her rights on the property back to her aunty..
We had initially suggested them to get
a) Deed of release by the second name to the first nameby mutual concent..
b) Indeminity to our society wherein our society shall not be responsible or liable for such transfer of rights in any way..
c) Formal application to our society..
What are the documents necessary and the procedures therein...
The member expressed that they donot want to register the Deed of transfer but will get it notorised to save on payment of stamp duty & registration charges etc..Is it mandatory to get he registration done for the Deed of release..
Appreciate your kind and valuable advise on the above..
Thanks an regards
Bhasker Thirumala
Kindly let me know the detailed procedure including appropriate forms for getting registered as notary(Cenrtral Govt).
Tenant was occupying a room in housing society. He was staying with his two daughters and a son. He expired a few years back. After the death of the tenant,one daugher is staying in that room and makes payment of rent. Society issues rent receipt in the name of the deceased (original tenant i.e. father) whenever payments are made by the daugher who is staying in the room.
Now she and her brother both are claimimg tenancy right of the room.
Whether society needs to transfer rent receipt in any one of them if so then whose name.
Further, their father was a tenant of the society and not the owner of that room.
Can Society send eviction notice to the person staying in the room and take possession of the room.
A, B, C are brothers. A is the eldest and C is the youngest among the three. A criminal case has begun under section 294 b 323 and 506 (2) against A and C and against the wife of C. B is the litigant.
For the same incident happened there is another case,in which C is the litigant and B is the accused.
For one and the same incidence, there are two separate cases and there are two ( false witnessees) in each case.
In each FIR, nothing has been mentioned about the other two witnesses.
This fact itself is enough to show that the cases are fabricataed cases.
My question is how to club the two cases into a single one since the incident ( actually accident) is the same for the two alleged criminal actions.
I am "A" in this case. Kinly guide me.
My lawer says that it is not possible to club the case into a single case.
Dear sir,
I m user of FORM 26AS (Online view of tax Credit) facilities provided by NSDL.
I found a Party in our List showing around 6000 Tds (Contactual Pmt) Deducted for two financial years.07-08 & 08-09 for which we have not raised any such bill .I spoke to the party but the party denied for such deduction. Say as we don’t know. I have also checked tan number which matches with that of the party.
Pls give solution to my below queries
1 What if the party is booking fabricated expenses in their books of accounts & pay tds in our account? What consequences we may face for the same?
2 Should we take the tax credit for income tax purpose?
3 What if the party says to enquire at NSDL ? who is responsible for it we or the party? & how ?
4 Pls give us complete solution?
Thanks in Advance.
Mahendra
I CPL LTD.-uttrakhand purchase a raw material from ABC LTD..-mumbai, cenvat charged 10000, & directly delevered to NOVELTY PLASTIC -mumbai for labour job agst. Excise challan annexure 2 .
My questions :
1-Who will take cenvat credit on raw material purchase from ABC LTD. (Any notification please mention)
2-Will NOVELTY PLASTIC charged excise duty or service tax when he will raised invoice to CPL LTD.
Can we take VAT credit of material purchase within state for repair of machinery .any notification please mention.
CPL LTD. Has two units in himanchal & uttrakhand each turnover 100 laks.
These are SSI Unit or Not ?
A criminal complaint U/s 23 was filed by CMO under PNDT Act in the year 2003 but he was not appointed as Appropriate Authority by way of Gazzet Notification as required by the Act. Later on Haryana Govt appointed CMO as appropriate authoirty vide notification dated 4.3.2009.Court dismissed the complaint on the ground that CMO was not appointed appropriate authority on the day of filing of complaint hence complaint is not maintainable. Now the govt by way of Oridinance appointed CMO as appropriate authority with restropectve effect. Whether this oridenance is legal one?
Is it possible to get details of a loan/ credit card accounted in a Private bank under Right to Information Act?
This question is in relation to Professional Tax Applicable in Karnataka.
Section 4 of THE KARNATAKA TAX ON PROFESSIONS, TRADES, CALLINGS AND EMPLOYMENT ACT, 1976 states as quoted below:
4. Employer's liability to deduct and pay tax on behalf of employees.- The tax payable under this Act by any person earning a salary or wage, shall be deducted by his employer from the salary or wage payable to such person before such salary or wage is paid to him, and such employer shall, irrespective of whether such deduction has been made or not when the salary or wage is paid to such persons, be liable to pay tax on behalf of all such persons:
Unquote.
My view is that the words above "BEFORE SUCH SALARY OR WAGE PAID TO HIM" means the net salary. Also the words "ANY DEDUCTIONS" from salary is not included in the act.
So is my point view correct as per the law?
parent document and consecutive sales deed not matching
Dear Sirs,
I bought a property in chennai in 2007 in a Unapproved lay-out which was formed in 1987.
My plot no. is 10 and my adjacent Plot is No. 11 in Eastern Side. The Northern boundary of Plot No 11 is 8. The first sale deeds executed in 1989 Clearly show that there is a 20 feet Road on the Eastern side of the Plot Nos. 11 and 8.But in the consecutive sale deeds The 20 feet road is taken away.The first Purchaser of Plot no. 8 buys only 60 feet on the Northern side in 1989 but he sells 80 feet in 2001.Thus occupying the 20 Feet Road. Similarly the First purchaser of the Plot No. 11 buys only 35 feet in Southern side in 1990 but he sells 55 feet in 2001. (Occupying our 20 Feet Road). And now the 20 feet road is completely blocked. That is the only access Road for us to reach the main Road. What is the remedy? Can we file a WP against the Sub Registrar in the Madras High Court to declare the consecutive Sales Deeds are Nil and Void?
(the 20 Feet Road is beneath the 33 KV High Tension Line)
Please advice.