shamsuddin
18 August 2009 at 17:36
Perpetual injuction should be granted to the lawful tenant
ADRIAN B. D'MELLO
18 August 2009 at 17:32
I HAD FITTED AN A/C IN 2005, & THE ELECTRICIAN HAD TAMPERED WITH THE METER & RELIANCE ENERGY HAD NOTICED THE SAME. I PAID RELIANCE THE PENALTY/DIFFERENCE. THE SOCIETY M.C MADE AN ISSUE OF THIS AND TRIED RASING A PENALTY FROM ME, WHICH I REFUTED. THEY THEN TOOK A DECISION AND PASSED A RESOLUTION TO DEBAR ME FROM JOINING THE M.C FOR LIFE. I APPROACHED THE HSG. FEDERATION & THEY GAVE ME A LETTER IN WRITING THAT SINCE THIS WAS A PERSONNAL ISSUE & RELIANCE HAD CHARGED ME FOR THE SAME, THE M.C HAD NO RIGHT TO DEBAR ME. SUBSEQUENTLY THEY WERE HARRASSING ME BY PASSING COMMENTS. AT THE AGM HELD ON 9.8.09 SOME MEMBERS PROPOSED MY NAME AS CHAIRMAN SINCE I HAD SERVED THE SOCIETY FOR 18 YEARS, BUT SOME MEMBERS ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT SINCE I HAVE BEEN DEBARRED I COULD NOT BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MC, OR HOLD ANY POST. SINCE THEY HAVE BROUGHT THE SOCIETY TO LOSS FOR THE PAST 3 YRS, MOST OF THE MEMBERS HAVE LOST CONFIDENCE IN THEM , BUT THEY ARE SCARED TO SAY DIRECTLY BECAUSE OF THE DADAGIRI ATTITUDE. I REQUEST YOU TO GUIDE ME HOW TO CLOSE THE ISSUE ONCE & FOR ALL & TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE WRONG. AN EARLY REPLY & GUIDANCE WILL HIGHLY BE APPRECIATED.
THANKS & REGARDS: ADRIAN D'MELLO
ADRIAN B. D'MELLO
18 August 2009 at 17:30
I HAD FITTED AN A/C IN 2005, & THE ELECTRICIAN HAD TAMPERED WITH THE METER & RELIANCE ENERGY HAD NOTICED THE SAME. I PAID RELIANCE THE PENALTY/DIFFERENCE. THE SOCIETY M.C MADE AN ISSUE OF THIS AND TRIED RASING A PENALTY FROM ME, WHICH I REFUTED. THEY THEN TOOK A DECISION AND PASSED A RESOLUTION TO DEBAR ME FROM JOINING THE M.C FOR LIFE. I APPROACHED THE HSG. FEDERATION & THEY GAVE ME A LETTER IN WRITING THAT SINCE THIS WAS A PERSONNAL ISSUE & RELIANCE HAD CHARGED ME FOR THE SAME, THE M.C HAD NO RIGHT TO DEBAR ME. SUBSEQUENTLY THEY WERE HARRASSING ME BY PASSING COMMENTS. AT THE AGM HELD ON 9.8.09 SOME MEMBERS PROPOSED MY NAME AS CHAIRMAN SINCE I HAD SERVED THE SOCIETY FOR 18 YEARS, BUT SOME MEMBERS ONCE AGAIN STATED THAT SINCE I HAVE BEEN DEBARRED I COULD NOT BECOME A MEMBER OF THE MC, OR HOLD ANY POST. SINCE THEY HAVE BROUGHT THE SOCIETY TO LOSS FOR THE PAST 3 YRS, MOST OF THE MEMBERS HAVE LOST CONFIDENCE IN THEM , BUT THEY ARE SCARED TO SAY DIRECTLY BECAUSE OF THE DADAGIRI ATTITUDE. I REQUEST YOU TO GUIDE ME HOW TO CLOSE THE ISSUE ONCE & FOR ALL & TELL THEM THAT THEY ARE WRONG. AN EARLY REPLY & GUIDANCE WILL HIGHLY BE APPRECIATED.
THANKS & REGARDS: ADRIAN D'MELLO
AMIT KARIA
18 August 2009 at 17:03
I was working as a Company Secretary in a company & on 19th July,2009 I resigned by giving proper notice. Then I joined a new co. as their CS.
But the concerned persons in the previous co. despite repeated requests are not filing the required Form 32 for my cessation from their secretaryship. Because of this, i'm unable to file my fresh Form 32 for the new co.
What action should I take against the co.?
anil
18 August 2009 at 16:13
Hi,
One of colleagues is in UK and had a marriage affidavit and now he would like to take marriage certificate so as to apply depedant work permit for his wife. Is it possible in his absense to have marriage registration can happen. Please advise.
Best Regards
Anil
Mehul K Ghedia
18 August 2009 at 15:35
Thanks in advance,
I am planning to buy a resale flat in the Registered Co-Op-Hsg Soc. in the western suburb of mumbai.
The society has been registered since 2006.
The conveyance deed has not been executed in favour of the society by the builder. so i want to know what is the implication/ legal consequnces of the same. is it ok to purchase the flat in such society?
ashish sharma
18 August 2009 at 15:26
My wife married with me in feb 2005 and after taking divorce from her ex-husband her ex-husband took forceful possession over the property at patel nagar, new delhi which is in the name of my wife through gpa of 1995.She is sole owner of said flat but her ex-husband is a greedy person took forcible possession over the said property and molest my wife with their family members in public FIR was lodged aginst her ex-husband in ps patel nagar u/s-354/341/34 IPC in may 2005.Thereafter we both file petition for survillence and protection when her ex-husband threaten to me and my wife for withdrawl of FIR in 2008.High Court has passed decision in our favour.In Oct 2008 her ex-husband file false civil case for suit for perpetual injunction against me and my wife for the possession of said property on the basis of forged mortgage deed tht my wife has taken rs. 10 lacs from him in june 2005 and mortgaged the said property.how it is possible the FIR was lodged against this person in may 2005 and my wife took rs. 10 lacs in june 2005 and mortgage deed was expired on june 2006.When we come to know about said mortagage deed my wife immidiate registered the said property in my name for saving the property from her ex-husband in oct 2008.I had filed complaint case u/s-200 cr.pc. for preparing forged document against this person in nov 2008.But the court dont summon the accused on the basis that this forged mortgage deed is not sufficient to summon the accussed in aug 2009.we will go to revision to sessions in next 3 to 4 days.Any expert may kindly suggest how we will disposess the said person from the said property,suggest any suit or civil litigation to evict this person from the said propery immidiate.Can we go for suit for possession in my name or my wife name?
vijay dhiman
18 August 2009 at 15:23
Wht is the processors of filing the suit & fir of criminal tresspass.how much court fees attached with the suit
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
Judgement in District court to demolish the steps
Case History
2001 Filed a case in Thanjavur civil court against the neighbor for interrupting the construction of staircase as he doesn't have wall for his house entrance, and according to the document the wall is on our boundry. We request the court to allow us to scale certain part of the wall to build our staircase.
2006 Got Judgment to proceed with our constriction in our premises accourding to our document produced to the court. Also reclaim the fund occurred as court expenses
We constructed the staircase by scale certain portion of the wall, on completion the opponent refused to work on their end leaving bricks seen and claim that their wall got damaged.
2006 Our Opponent filed a case district court that due to our construction their wall got damaged and they requested court to issue order to demolish staircase.
2009 today : District Court issued order to us to demolish the staircase within 3 months.
The wall is about 12 feet high and 8 feet long. the wall is in our premises and the opponent has no wall at all.
Any help / advise in this case is highly appreciated.
Many Thanks !
Raja