Sumir
06 July 2009 at 21:51
1. We have State Vigilence commission, Central Vigilence commission. Do they have power to look in above matters? Are they Functioning?
2. We have EOW and ACB of state.Do they have power to look in above matters? Are they Functioning?
3. We have EOW and ACB of CBI.Do they have power to look in above matters? Are they Functioning?
4. We have Maharashtra Human Rights Commission and National Human Rights Commission, Can they rap the above mentioned six authorities for inaction?
5. We have Lokayukta and Up lok Ayukta? Whats the difference? Can they rap the above mentioned six authorities for inaction? Can they themself take action.
(I need advices since I have proofs pertaining to involvement of a very BIG person in crores of scam/ scandal /fraud/ cheating/Economic Offence/Corrution, 420, etc.
Kumar Krishan Agarwal Advocate
06 July 2009 at 21:09
Dear Solicitor,
I am an advocate and tangled with the problem of its unique kind.
1. My mother has two younger sisters and four younger brothers. So actually seven children are there who have one ancestral shop 30 * 20 sq. foot area in market. My mother and two younger sisters want to sell the shares but no buyer has coming forward as the buyer want whole (seven) shares of the seven children before purchasing.
2. All Brothers don't want to sell their shares to anybody. One brother has taking and doing trade business into the shop for so long. HE has not been sharing any profit earnings from the sisters. [i.e taking undue advantage and profits from that shop.]
3. I didn't want o file a partition suit for recovery of the title partition of our shares, as it requires heavy court fees and long proceedings. This property is also not able for making individual partition among seven children.
4. Now what the alternatives are ?
a. How to dispose of this property and gets the buyer excluding four brothers shares so that he purchases our shares?
b. File a declaration and perpetual injunction suit so that all the brothers cannot earn from the property. and leave it as it is forever ?
c. Property how dissolved without the interference of our four younger brothers ?
Will court will provide any alternative so that the property will be dissolved without the four brothers shares.
5. At last, I want anyway so that the property is to be dissolved or being restricted forever being used by any brother. whether it lay empty closed shop into the whole-life absolutely till death.
Thanks for giving your valuable advise,
by
KK Agarwal Adv,
Muzaffarnagar , INDIA.
Mb:- 09319365499
i.vasudevan
06 July 2009 at 20:23
i want to meet one case in my office...
i tell the short of the case
one lady got the land (self acquired)by registered sale deed dated 28.06.1930 and she died in the year 1935 leaving behind her two sons and three daughters. Her two sons sold the same property in the year 1945 and the same property was sold by her three daughters in the year 1957.
Now which document is valied?
how the share will succession to the heirs?
in my office we are searching authority?
can u help me sir?
Bharat
06 July 2009 at 19:53
can you tell abut this course(procedure) please reply soon.
srinivasan
06 July 2009 at 19:42
Dear sir, DISTINCTION BETWEEN JOINTFAMILY BUSINESS AND PARTNERSHIP BUSINESS
Vivek vashishth
06 July 2009 at 19:27
please tell me about department name of anganwadi schools where I can move an application under right to information Act,2005 for getting some information in favour of justice. give me reply as soon aspossible
thanks
vivek vashishth
vivek.vashishth@indiatimes.com
Divya Michelle Rajiva
06 July 2009 at 18:32
I have some questions on the Maternity Benifits Act. The company i work with doesn't want to discriminate on employment of women who are on the family way.
1. Can the company remove any clause which states a certain duration of employment is required for a women to be eligible.
2. Can the company overwrite the clause which says it is applicable only for the first 2 deliveries?
3. Is this benefit applicable only to married women or women in general?
Any assistance will be truly appreciated
kalyani choudhury
06 July 2009 at 18:27
I have changed my counsel. Now my previous lawyer is delaying returning my files making some or the other excuse. Presently he says he is going out of town. My court dates are close and my new counsel is unable to study the papers. The old counsel is not attending the phone calls however he has emailed me & said when he is back he will give back my files after taking a 'NO Dues ' from me.
All payments are clear from my side.
Why does he want a No DUES form Me. & When should I get him to sign the NOC's in the Vakalatnamas ? Can he refuse to sign them ? If so Why ? Please Help.
amit jain
06 July 2009 at 17:50
I have given resignation from my company & company agreed to pay me two months notice period but they paid only one month. When I am asking them to pay me, they declined and they told me that i was terminated due to falst statmenet and playing politics. I have everything in writing which clearly demonstrate that I have given resignation & I was very good employee. All such type of email communication was between me and my ex boss. Same person told me that he will give me good refernce for my work in email and now he is telling i was terminated. He also communicated to the team at the time of resignation that I have given resignation because of personal reason. Now tell me what type of remedy available to me. Thanks in advance
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
contract
i lodged complain regarding the cancel of the transacation of the flat due to rejection of loan due to not perform the sale agreement by the opponent i joined the two parties 1] from where the representative who collected the cheques from me 2] and another main office [head office ] having the name x developers now opponet lawyer came with the application to delete the no- 1 who is not a party because he is only employee of the head office and the other office is created ant the local location having kept name x precious
have any judgment not to delete the person who has done work on behalf of the head office which is appointed by the company ples discuss the said matter thanks to all experts