Nehal
27 June 2009 at 12:12
Dear Sir
Is there any limitation on using brackets in a name of a company to be incorporated in India?
Regards
Nehal
Buvaneswari
27 June 2009 at 11:37
Sir..a govt employee (54yrs) died due to sickness, leaving his wife, two unmarried sons and a married daughter. legal heir certificate given by tahsildhar is carrying these 4 people names. Before death, he got jewel loan in IOB (pledged his wife's gold jewels). Now, that family wants to redeem the jewels by paying the o/s loan amt. but the manager asks them to add deceased man's mother's name in legal heir certificate. But their ration card doesnt have his mother's name as she lived seperately with her husband. Is it must to add his mother's name in legal heir certificate?
archana shah
27 June 2009 at 11:31
hi
can any one provid me the format of agreement for conversion of proprietory firm to private limited company
thanks
Mohamed Ali
27 June 2009 at 07:23
A muslim partition suite is preliminary decreed in the year 1954, the final decree proceedings is still pending and ajouned yasterday for next month, which had started in the year 1986,
All the decree holders and even many of their children and grandchildren have died, many of the legal heirs of decree holders have to brought on record and some of the legal heirs of a decree holder(plaintiff) who are not entitle for share as per Mohammedan law have wrongly been added as legal heirs of one plaintiff t the start of final decree proceedings.
Question: Now the Judge is suddenly taken a U turn and is telling, all of the legal heirs write a memo stating that pass on the final decree as per preliminary decree dated 1954 and he will passed an order, ignoring almost 80 Interlocutary application pending from the year 1986 in the pending final decree proceedings, in which some application to delete some wrongly added legal heirs of one of the plaintiff is also their and some subsequent purchaser after decree have been added as additional defendants and rest many of the application is to bring legal heirs of decree holders on record. our advocate questioned the judge he cannot pass an order based on preliminary decree as all of the decree holders have long died now but the judge is not willing to listen our advocate, our advocate said final decree proceedings is nothing but continuation of original suite and anything can be done here, or advocate further said we have an Interlocutory application pending in this FDP to delete some legal heirs of one plaintiff who are not entitle for share and have been wrongly made as parties, but the judge is saying that u can take care of that after the share is allotted to that plaintiff as per decree,but that plaintiff has died in 1979 and even her children except one daughter have died. But the judge is not understanding the things, Please advice how to proceed as we want the legal heirs of plaintiff who are not entitle for share must be removed from record in the pending final decree proceedings itself, further the judge is telling u can raise your concern in execution after final decree is passed which is wrong, can we go to high court on that memo which judge is taking to pass final decree based on preliminary decree and stop the judge from doing so, or what alternatives are there for us.
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:47
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:46
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:45
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
Gaurav Pandya
27 June 2009 at 03:43
For the accused side in M. P.'s District Court @ Jabua - The Stage is Recall of Bank officer.
(1) Complainant has not filed complain with cheque return stemps on cheques ?
After when they give the original check they get the stemps on cheques.
Is this point useful ?
(2) The cheques were of Security Deposit.
Than in N. I. Act it is useful to accused that the cheques were for the security deposits not for payment ?
(3) In core banking,
(A) there are not charges cut from account for cheques return ?
(B) The cheques were return after 4 days in local clearing and even though there are not stamps on cheque ? Is this complain maintanable ?
Is this point useful ?
(4) What will happen, is it possible, If the accuse dont want to go with more dates & proceedings and he is ready to pay the amount of cheques as compromise.
What will be thinking of the court ?
Please give me the detailed replies, and if possible than with citations...
gaurav_the_great@hotmail.com
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
neighbourr problem
Dear friends,
I am staying in an apartment complex. There was some problem with a neighbour related to gossiping about myself and wife with other neighbours in the complex. After a show off discussion our families stopped interacting in any way. Now the said neighbour has apparently engaged a lawyer and this lawyer has sent a legal notice claiming that we are mentally torturing and harassing them. We should stop doing this otherwise a police complaint shall be filed. The lawyer seems of very low capability as the letter is so full of errors that one can hardly understand what is meant to be conveyed. There is nothing specific mentioned in the letter by way of date or incidents.even the spelling of the name is wrong.
What is suggested course of action? Should I respond at all?
if Yes how a) by myself or b) through a lawyer?