AJIT KAWATKAR
13 April 2009 at 12:00
the owner is spinster-sr.citizen &staying away with relative on health gr.In her absence a couple has tresspassed into the appartment-neither ready to vacate/purchase nore ready to pay compansation(rent).because of age(80+)&delays in getting justice she decided to sell the ppty.as-is-where-is basis to which she has received an offer.i would like to know terms should be included in the DEED to avoide troubles(?)in future.
Hasmukh Sonara
13 April 2009 at 11:50
Sir, I have been scamed by International orgn and lost money.Their representatives and bank accounts available in delhi.Kindly advice how CBI will advice to reach them and blast their network ,who are attached with them in delhi so other indian save their money.
BHANU RASPUTRA
13 April 2009 at 11:19
WHETHER RENTED PREMISES CAN BE GIVEN BY WILL?
WHETHER WIDOW CAN HAVE RIGHT ON RENTED PROPERTY LEVING MATRIMONIAL HOME AND INTEND TO MARRY??
anju jain
13 April 2009 at 10:21
Dear All,
what would be the consequence of the cases pending trial after harman Electronics (p) ltd vs. National panasonic (I) ltd. Will it have retrospective effect. remedy/ redressal if any.
thanks
G. ARAVINTHAN
13 April 2009 at 07:15
In a Pauper Suit, we use to send notice to Government Pleader.
Is it mandatory to send notice to District Collector ?
SREEKUMAR
12 April 2009 at 22:21
There are differences of opinion on sharing of common maintanace expenses w.r.t.our flat situated at cochin.
1 view:- It should be shared basis the sft.area owned by the flat owners.
2. view:- It should be shared equally by the flat owners irrespective of area owned.
Pls inform which is right? whether salary paid to the security personnel,cleaning workers etc. can be treated as common expenses?
regds
kumar.
SREEKUMAR
12 April 2009 at 22:11
I entered into agreement for construction and agreement for sale ( of UDS)with a builder of cochin in 2006. 85% of the flat was completed in 2007 and the builder handed over the possesion to the association at this stage. As some of the repair works to my flat was not completed as agreed by the builder, i have not taken the possesion of the flat.Now the builder has completed the work and demanding following payments for issuing NOdues certificate.
1. service tax of 4%
2. work contract tax of 4%
Pls inform whether i need to pay the same as per law? the UDS is already registered in my name @ 85% stage of construction.
regds,
kumar.
shalini
12 April 2009 at 21:22
i am from surat stating in a 4 storeyed building having 8 flats in all. we have so far not formed any co-op. society as such. we have been staying here from the last 6 years. we have received a notice from the city talati's office that according to the revised rate, we have to pay an amt. of Rs.12495 (land mehsul revised rate) and Rs.3305 (education charge). this is for the last 18 yrs. and the notice is in the name of the original landowner. my question is who is responsible or the payment--whether it is the builder from whom we purchased the flat or dowe have to pay it?
AMIT TANEJA
12 April 2009 at 18:55
what actions can be taken
what sections will be applied
how the aagrieved party proceed
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
murder
if a person with the intension to thread someone carries a pistal with him to his house. but in a heated conversation fire a bullet on the plaitiff who in order to save himself jumps from the balcony and bullet so fired hit him on his leg but died becuse of falling from height
wt sections can save him
if u r on the defandant side