LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

N.K.Assumi   09 September 2008 at 09:22

Section 14 of HMA Unreasonable:

That section 14 of the Hindu Marriage act 1954 is unreasonable and should be remove from the statue book. Why should the Law manacled the couple for one year when they have no desire to continue together, infact this will amount to mental torture to the couple. This one year period is unreasonable.

TS Bhatia   09 September 2008 at 09:20

obligations of Principal employer

What are the obligations of Principal Employer under contract labour act,1970 ?

BRAJENDRA SINGH   09 September 2008 at 08:34

Deployment of Primary Teachers in Election Work.

Recently Supreme Court had given a verdict directing the Government not to send primary teachers on Election related work such as Photo identity Cards i.i. BLO duty.

Kindly get me copy of the judgement as violations are being reported at many places.

Brajendra singh
singhbbd@gmail.com

TS Bhatia   09 September 2008 at 08:13

procedure for impeachment of high court judge

What is the procedure of impeaching high court judge ?

TS Bhatia   09 September 2008 at 08:09

leave accumulation

What is the maximum limit of accumulating leave with wages under factories act,1948 ?

N.K.Assumi   09 September 2008 at 07:58

Suit against Marriage Officer:

If a marriage is solemnized by an officer who is not competent to act as marriage officer under Special Marriage Act 1954, and if such marriage is void can the couple file suit against such Officer? What about the status of the child born of such void marriage? Are they legitimate or illegitimate child. If illegitimate due to the Officer can such child sue the officer on attaining majority? What steps should be taken to validate the marriage? Can such Officer take refuge under judges protection act of 1985?

N.K.Assumi   09 September 2008 at 07:36

Incest and Indian Penal Code:

What does the Indian Penal Code says with regard to the Incest? Will the honorable member of this forum share the problems of incest?

J K Agrawal   09 September 2008 at 06:29

S 163A Motor Vehicle Act

When a Claim is filed under MOTOR Vehicle Act, in case of death of boy of 27 year, not married, The claimants are parents aged about 50. The multiplier applicable is as per age of parents as it calculates less in comparison of calculation as per age of deceased. But if the case is filed UNDER SECTION 163A of MV Act age of DECEASED only is taken into consideration and no fact beyond schedule II is considered. Will anybody give me citation on this particular point? I have come to know that MFA 282/2002 decided on 20/11/2007 by the Honable Kerala High Court titled as I Damodaran v M K Valsala is direct citation on this point. Will any body help me to furnish hard or soft copy of the Judgment?

Shekhar   09 September 2008 at 00:20

Can a company fire a employee on the Background Verification Details?

Pls. share ! Can a company fire any employee on Back groung Verification details? If yes under which 'act' this back ground verification come in of the Company! pls. share it in detail!!!

Shekhar   09 September 2008 at 00:19

Can a company fire a employee on the Background Verification Details?

Pls. share ! Can a company fire any employee on Back groung Verification details? If yes under which 'act' this back ground verification come in of the Company!