LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ram   07 August 2008 at 16:35

Validate of NJ

Sir, Non-Judicial Stamp Papers (4) was purchased in 1981,1995,1998,2008 presented for registration by the vendor in 2008. It is correct. If there in any restriction for document registration . Pl
Note this is belong to Andhra Pradesh State

Priti Bakalkar   07 August 2008 at 15:17

Plea Bargaining

Is the amendment to Cr. P. C. in respect of Plea Bargaining has come in force in India? If so, can you suggest the case law on the said subject.
Tx.

Gurumourthi   07 August 2008 at 14:54

Legal terminology

What is the difference between Agreement and deed

venkatesh.blore   07 August 2008 at 13:43

PF & ESI Registration

Company A employs 4 persons who are on the rolls of the company. Further, it hires 18 persons to work for it who are on the rolls of B company. Company B is registered with PF & ESI authorities and complying with the relevant laws.

In this situation, since the company A has only 4 persons on its rolls, it has not registered under PF & ESI. Is there a statutory requirement to register?

advocate satya   07 August 2008 at 13:26

N.I.ACT sec 138

sir
if anyone takes a loan from any bank in delhi and if any cheque of EMI bounces or the person who had taken the loan is not repaying can the bank can lodge a case outside delhi on the pretext that the branch office or the head office is there so they can file the complaint there, is it not harrasment of consumer to face the trial in another city , moreover is there any judgement in relevance to this ?

NAMRATA DONTUL   07 August 2008 at 13:16

reg. maternity benefit act

I am an employee of IT co. I would like to know the eligibility of a woman to avail maternity benefit in an IT Company. Is it 80 days or 160 days? What are the various benefits that she could avail if she is eligible for maternity benefit/provisions.

Jaydeep Kurup   07 August 2008 at 12:23

Work Hours

Does section 54 and sec 56 of the Factories Act contradict each other. Whereas sec 54 states that a worker shall not be employed for more than 9 hrs in a day and 48 hrs in a week, sec 56 states that inclusive of rest hours it should not exceed 10 and 1/2 hrs.

So the company is supposed to pay OT after 9 or 10 and 1/2 hrs.

Please clarify asap.

Tarun Kalra LL.M, M.B.A   07 August 2008 at 07:52

contract act

hello dear,
can a 10+2 pass student who is of 16-17 year of age, who has signed the admission form(hardware computer course of jetking infrotrain), in which it is clearly mentioned that that fees is non-refundable, can claim fees refund later on ground that he is a minor and cant contract, so his fee must be refunded, can he do so? because the minors are alwyas sign admission forms. plz guide what to do, for not refunding his fee, as in future other students too take this plea and will demand their fees back.

R.Manivasagan   06 August 2008 at 21:42

Civil Law-CPC-Order 22 Rule 2

I Am for the Plaintiff side.It is suit for Declaration of Title. The 1st Defendant died on 14.07.2007. The 2nd Defendant is one of his son and the 3rd Defendant is his one of the daughters.The counsel for the defendant did not inform about the death of the 1st Defendant. Anyhow immediately after the knowledge we had filed an application on 25.12.2007 to impaled the LRs's of the deceased 1st Defendant (the wife and another son and another daughter). We did not file an application to set aside the abatement for non taking steps within 90 days. Before filing that application I had consulted with a senior Advocate and he advised me that if other Legal Heris of the deceased were already on record, the question of abetment will not arise. so, I had filed the application accordingly, but the Trial Court dismissed our application on the ground that we should file an application to set aside the abetment. Is it correct or shall I file a revision against that order or Can I file a review before the same court. Wether the senior advocates advise is correct or not please answer my query.

Subrahmanyam   06 August 2008 at 19:36

Appointment of MD in listed Co.

Say the position of MD is expiring in the middle of the year say on 1 Nov 2007, however no action is taken in this regard after that date. He is re-appointed in the share holders meeting conducted after 31 march 2008 with retrospective effect.

1) In such a case what is the law, is the appointment valid,

2)Are the transactions done in between 1 Nov 2007 and 31 March 2008 valid even if they are not specifically ratified