atish singh
24 June 2008 at 12:41
A LTD ACQUIRED 29 % STAKE IN C LTD.C LTD IS A LISTED COMPANY.B LTD ALREADY HOLDS 21 % STAKE IN C LTD.THERE ARE 7 DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY .TWO OF THE ARE REPRESENTATIVE OF B LTD. AND FIVE ARE INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS. WHAT ARE THE STEPS TO BE TAKEN TO INDUCT THE REPRESENTATIVE OF A LTD INTO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF C LTD.?
hariom
24 June 2008 at 12:29
WHAT IS THE REMEDY AND OPTION OPEN FOR A FAMILY.
GIRL'S FAMILY HAS FILED A SUIT U/S 498,
WHAT ARE THE CHARGES AND CONSEQUENCES IN THIS CASE.
WHAT IS THE REMEDY FOR BOY'S FAMLIY, WHEN A GIRL'S FAMLIY FILE A CASE JUST FOR HAVING THEIR UNLAWFUL DEMAND OF STAYING SEPERATE FROM BOY'S MOTHER AND FATHER ( JOINT FAMILY). WHEN THEY DIDN'T SUCCEDED IN CONVINCING THE BOY, THEY ANNOYED AND FILED A SUIT SO THAT THE BOY'S FAMILY WOULD COME UP FOR SETTLEMENT AND THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO GET THEIR SELFISH WISH COMPLETED THROUGH MISUSE OF LAW.
rajendra
24 June 2008 at 12:14
Marriage women given power of attorney (unregistered - only notary) to her father and monther jointly/either/or before her marrige (in ther maiden name). Now she got married and her relation with parent are not good, she want to cancelled the power of attorney. What is the procedure for the same
Bindu
24 June 2008 at 11:49
I am for the accused & the complainant is bank. The matter is at the stage of cross
In the present case the statutory notice is dated 25/06/2007 & no where in the complaint nor affidavit there is whisper of when it was posted, neither the A.D Token issued by the postal authority s exhibited.
The complainant states that the notice which was posted returned intimation Unclaimed & is deemed service as per General clauses . However , the intimation which was posted to the recipient of the letter i.e my client on 27/06/2007. The complainant has taken that date as service date to accused. And they have filed the complaint on 19th July 2007. My Question is of premature complaint
Here in the present case, the complainant have wrongly taken the intimation date from postal authority to collect the letter by my client as the date of service of the notice. Which cannot be assumed to be date of service
As the postal authority have to wait for 7 days from the intimation & if the recipient does not collect or is not able to receive the letter then it is returned to sender with endorsement of non service. Therefore it is the date of endorsement of non service which has to be counted as deemed service not the intimation date by the postal authority to recipient to collect the Letter.
Therefore , in my point of view the same is premature & infracturous complaint. Kindly guide me whteher I am correct. Kindly provide me with the citations of premature complaint.
Further they have not annexed the loan papers
GAURAV S RASTOGI
24 June 2008 at 11:08
I WANT TO KNOW THE CURRENT RATE OF MINIMUM WAGES APPLICABLE IN A GARMENT INDUSTY IN GUJARAT AND PROFESSIONAL TAX TO BE DEDUCTED IN GUJARAT.
WHAT IS THE PROCEDURE FOR APPLYING FOR PROFESSIONAL TAX NUMBER & WHAT ARE THE FORMS FOR SUBMITTING THE PROFESSIONAL TAX.
REGARDS
GAURAV S. RASTOGI
NOTE : SENIORS ARE REQUESTED TO MAIL ME AT COMPSMART_GS@YAHOO.COM OR GAURAV.RASTOGI72@GMAIL.COM
a.quader
24 June 2008 at 10:38
My builder has sold some portion of open space in the complex for reserved parking. Now the Housing societyu which claims to have taken over all the rights from builder wants to sell the remaining open space for reserved parking.Is it legal or can they be challenged?
Quader
Joydip Mukherjee
23 June 2008 at 23:48
Whether subsequent notice for demand is admissible? First notice served duly to the accused, but the complainant failed to file the complaint,then the complt. once again presented the cheque within validity period and that also returned with remark"insufficient funds"then he further issued another notice of Demand to the accused which was not claimed.Is it maintainable to take cognizance by ld.court?
KamalNayanSaxena
23 June 2008 at 23:36
A property 'P' mortgaged by bank 'A'. Default in repayment by borrower. A/c classified as NPA. Proceeding under SARFAESI Act initiated by Bank 'A'.
In another proceeding against the same borrower person a decree passed by civil court to recover certain amount in favour of Bank 'B'.
In execution proceeding, Bank 'B' requested court narrating the fact about the said mortgage, to attach the 'P' to satisfy decree. Court attached 'P' and issued notice for proclaimation for sale and affixed them on a conspicuous part of 'P'. Meanwhile Bank 'A' sold 'P'.
Kindly advise remedy availabe in favour of Bank 'B' to recover itd debt. The borrower person is absconded and another property in his name is not available.
adv fauzia azim
23 June 2008 at 20:02
DEAR FRIENDS ,PLEASE LET ME KNOW HOW MANY MEMBERS OF A REGISTERED CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN FAVOUR FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY PROPERTY TO GO AHEAD.
THANKS,LOOKING FARWARD TO AN EARLY REPLY......
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
grant of anticipatory bail by superme court
Judgments of superme court in granting anticipatory bail in serious offences, particularly in the case of cheating & forgery etc.case under sec -420,471 of ipc.