Gaurang Tripathi
29 July 2016 at 15:30
A , B , C और D के विरूद्ध सहदायिकी पैतृक भूमि का आधार लेकर वादी द्वारा वादग्रस्त भूमि में अंशधारी होने एवं स्वत्व घोषणा हेतु वाद संस्थित किया गया । वादग्रस्त भूमि में A 1/2 भाग का अंशधारी एवं B,C,D संयुक्त रूप से 1/2 भाग के अंशधारी हैं । विचारण न्यायालय द्वारा केस फाइल दूसरे न्यायालय में मीडिएशन हेतु भेजी गई है । वादी एवं प्रतिवादी B,C,D परस्पर B,C,D के हिस्से की 1/2 वादग्रस्त भूमि के समझौते हेतु तैयार हैं परन्तु प्रतिवादी A समझौता नहीं करना चाहता है एवं विचारण चाहता है एसे में मीडिएशन न्यायालय क्या वादी एवं प्रतिवादी B,C,D के पारस्परिक समझौते को स्वीकृति प्रदान करेगा या नहीं ? एवं अगर नहीं तो क्या प्रतिवादी B,C,D एवं वादी विचारण न्यायालय में आदेश 23 नियम 3 c.p.c. के अंतर्गत समझौता कर सकते हैं ?
Message
Bhavik
29 July 2016 at 13:41
Hi All,
While doing consolidation of accounts, bi-mistakenly few inter company transactions are not removed and result is published.
What should we do for the same?
Its very very urgent...
Please guide..
AKULA RAJASEKHAR
29 July 2016 at 12:06
Dear Experts.,
I have filed Cheating case in Visakhapatnam Court., in their A2 & A3 they got stay from high court regaqrding quash their petition.,so A2 & A3 are not attending court as per high court order.
But A1 also not attending court along with them.,some times their advocate filing absent petition.,some times they are not representing.,
My question is there any chances to ask Concern court to issue NBW to A1?
Plz help me
Regards.,
**********
Pradyum kumar
29 July 2016 at 11:08
Respected Sirs,
I am Kumar residing in Madurai,
My father got 5acres of agri land in Kodaikanal in 1981, due to his health and family reasons he could not visit and maintain the land for several years but he routinely pays the property taxes and he has all the documents like sales deed, mother document, patta chitta, A register copy, FMB, Topo sketch, Adangal current, EC from 1981 to till date, up-to-date online chitta extract, surveyor's certificate etc.
Now he is in his seventies, when I went to see the land last week along with my father, the 2 nearby land holders not allowing us to enter our land. They said that my father's land is in their enjoyment now, they are asking for 50% of market value of land as compensation to vacate our land.
Somehow we managed and made them to agree for surveying our land first. After survey we came to know that our land is completely free from any encroachments. It is still completely tharisu (waste land) and not being done any agriculture activities, as we left it. But still they are asking for 50% of market value otherwise they threatened us that either they will not allow us to enter our land or not allow us to sell the land.
•They are not our relatives,
•We have not purchased the land from them,
•They are new to us and,
•We never left our land for lease to anyone,
•They don’t have any legal papers on our land (they don’t even know exactly how much land we own there),
•They are just nearby land holders doing all this in the intent to get money from my old age father.
Kindly help and suggest the proper way to deal with it.
Thanks in advance.
Vishal jain
29 July 2016 at 10:32
hello..
I(general quota) graduated in the year 1997 with 43% marks.
In the year 2012, I took admission for LL.B. program from one college in U.P. which is affiliated from MJPRU university.
This year I completed My LL.B.
As per rules of the university, the candidate from general quota must have 45% marks in graduation to take the admission in LL.B.
But my marks was 43%. Still the college has given me the admissiion.
Query..
Will it create any problem to register under Bar council.
If you can provide me the judgment regarding that which says that if any student is having less marks and still got admission in the university and completed the course, it is the fault of university, why should the student suffer.(Delhi high court OR supreme court judgment)
Anonymous
29 July 2016 at 09:28
Sir, my father-in-law is ex-army officer nd now 76 yrs old. 1 yr back i.e. in July 15, a munsi working inside court premier (who has enmity/clashes on house boundary with my father-in-law's younger brother) encouraged one lady from schedule caste (the lady is totally unknown and lives at remotely placed village) to file a case under (376, 511 and sc st act) sc st act and, rape attempts against my father-in-law, his younger brother and one more neighbours serving in crpf posted in chandigarh. My father-in-law is staying away from his brother , bt supported on one or two occasions physically being at site while both (munshi nd my father-in-law's younger brotherwere) quarrelling on boundary issue. Munshi is obc and his wife is sc. His wife's known lady has been involved in this case. An inquiry headed by sc sub-inspector submitted the report to dsp, then sp then to court stating no evidence found on the site and witness names are also false in the case. Now no hearing on case for 1 yr, suddenly magistrate changes (magistrate is also from same claimant caste). Previously enquired report has been nullified by court. Previous report totally disagrees with the claimant as 1 of the accused was in journey to vellore as attendee to his relative patient and train ticket is available, his mobile location also reveals the same, another accused mobile location was also reported at different place.
The lady is not agreeing for compromise as the munshi don't want it. She doesn't identify any of the accused bcz she has never faced them. The court has ordered for fresh enquiry.
Now what and how should b our approach to the court of law.?
Gurdit Singh
29 July 2016 at 09:18
Dear Sir, I am an old law graduate who happened to be migrated abroad and acquired Canadian citizenship.I do not practiced the legal profession any where. Now coming to the point, I obtained OCI and planning to come back to India to settle down permanently.I wish to presue the legal profession as it is mentioned in the OCI act that one can practice Law as profession in India. But going through the Advocates act there is no mention in this regard and even from the Internet resources it has been highlighted that OCI is not allowed as the relevent act has no such provision.Can any body could help on this issue.?????
Rajesh kumar
29 July 2016 at 08:47
Is partnership deed for business operation among two partners validitct by notary public on of 1000 non judicial stamp..or what wil be suitable under legal process for partnership deed , sale deed , will, power of attorney.... Plz. Clear it smoothly.
© 2025 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
My friend father died without will
My friends father AA died in 2001 without writing will, his wife, daughter and widow mother BB were the legal heir. And also obtained legal heir certificate from authority. the window mother BB died in 2006. Now when we go for selling the property, some are telling we have to get some registered docs from the other two sons of BB, ( brother of AA) that they do not have any interest over the property, since BB she was one of the legal heir. The property was purchased by my friend father AA from his own income.