My mother and grandmother had purchased a shop jointly few years back and my grandmother passed away last year. My grandmother has 3 sons and one daughter including my father. Now we want to sell the shop so what shall be the next step. Shall we get a haq tyag signed by my grandmother's children, so that my mother will be the sole owner. Secondly does haq tyag needs to be registered at registrar office.and what if any of the parties refuses to sign.
me and my friend riding to home in my bike. suddenly he says me to stop the bike at the street and he goes back by walk above 100 metres and knock one person with knife and he come and says me to start bike suddenly , i didnt know he knock one person with knife because it was night time 11.30 . when i drop him at home then only i see his shirt was blood. i asked him what u do . he says no problem u go to home . then next day morning police came to my home and arrest me and him and remand me in 307 ipc. there is any problem to me . i didnt no any case in police station.please answer me sir there is any problem to me . now i am in conditional bail.
Hello to all who can help,
In the event of the father disowning an adult daughter, does she still have a claim to ancestral property? The property cannot be sold without the signature of the daughter I am told, but in the event of forced signature what steps can be taken? Can provisions be made to ensure some sort of compensation before the sale so as to not harm the parent-child relationship? Otherwise must the daughter go through a legal battle to ensure her total share is gotten fairly... ?
Hi
we are 3,one brother and 2 sisters. Our father died with out a will and he had a house on his name.
If one of my sister ready to sign and transfer her share for a small consideration in comparison to market rate, what will be the best in terms of avoid future litigation
between Gift, Relinquishment and Sale.
I knew the difference in stamp duty and tax benefits so I am looking for an answer from the angle of avoiding future litigation.
Thanks in advance
Madhavi
i have been called to lok adalat by BSNL for a bill unpaid for 13 yars. i was not aware of this bill and no information given earlier to me can i claim time bound
What does mean of security and PDC cheques, if drawer fill all content of cheques include date, amount, name of the holder & signed the cheque. And gave 3 months before on the date of cheques Can it's called security cheque/ pdc, also can 138 ni act applicable.
I love a girl(Reena), we want to do intercast marriage.our parents don't agree with us. Please tell me about court marriage or any other way.
How to apply for marriage?
dear sir
my uncle and father are engaged in legal property in alwar rajasthan ythe property is purchased by ny fathjer and to uncles but one of then has acquired it and not ready to give possession .we have already filed a suit but due to non availability of judges we are getting how dates of such 3 months we are financially weak ny father is unemployed and i n studying and doing work we dont have anythingonly this property.
i got one suggestion from lawyer he got me to letter to chief justice of india and home minister regarding the cause which will help to get the case transfer in fast track without paying anything. i wan to know wat contents to be added in that lettet. is there any particular formatof suh type of letter?where is this letter to be send and what contents to be added
its urgent pls help
In a criminal state case, there are 4 accused charged with section 409/420. Charged framed u/s 409/420. Against the charge Framing order 2 accused went to High Court u/s 482, application of which is pending at HC. Thereafter remaining 2 accused filed revision application u/s 397 against charge framing order before Session Judge. Is revision application is maintainable when same cause of action an application is pending before High court, though filed by different accused persons.
Urgent- please clearfy below order
R/sir
I want to know my quashing is success or not. In below order m a petitioner.. Please clear
"Petitioners, by way of instant petition, seek quashing of impugned complaint as well as summoning order, however, without availing their equally efficacious alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order.
Admittedly, petitioners have not availed their equally efficacious alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order.
In view of the above, petitioners are relegated to their equally efficacious alternative remedy of revision against the impugned summoning order, at the first instance with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court again by way of similar quashing petition, if necessity arises. It is also made clear that if the petitioners would file appropriate revision petition against the impugned summoning order within a period of one month from today, respondent shall not raise the issue of limitation against the petitioners.
Disposed of, accordingly."
Thanks