Case 125crpc in family court , delhi
Kunal
(Querist) 20 June 2017
This query is : Resolved
Crpc 125 case
1. Respondent earn approx 8.5k but judge wrote in his order that respondent admitted that he earn 10k but in reality respondent did not admitted 10k.
And judge orderd the 5000 add interim per month from date of application (arrears are of 19 months)
2. petitioner submitted over-ruled income affidavit. Respondent requested judge verbally as well as written application to order petitioner to bring kusum Sharma but judge did not listened respondent nor accepted the written application.
3. Petitioner submitted in her income affidavits (outdated one) that she does not earns money, whereas she was earning or not, respondent do not have any proof of her earnings at that time for that period. But now she is earning, respondent have the proof of past 1 year.
4. Now petitioner filled execution case and judge is not taking the review application. From respondent.
5. Petitioner submitted her replication(with affidavit) and submitted that she is a house wife, whereas in that date she is earning and respondent have that proofs on record..
NOW WHAT SHOULD RESPONDENT DO??
Kunal
(Querist) 20 June 2017
Pl answer experts
Kunal
(Querist) 20 June 2017
It's urgent plz answer
P. Venu
(Expert) 21 June 2017
Please state the simple facts.
Rajendra K Goyal
(Expert) 21 June 2017
If was not satisfied with the decision, the same should have challenged.
Prove the income through documentary proofs like income tax statement / salary slip / form 16 / employer statement before court etc.
