Claim 10% reserve panel at the place of withheld candidate
Jayant
(Querist) 02 September 2022
This query is : Resolved
Delhi Police Recruitment 2020
total no of.post 5690
final results declared on 15 Dec 2021
A 10% reserve panel of total vacancy (means 569 candidate other than 5690) also maintained by SSC for those who didn't want to join Delhi police or found PVR adverse or any other reason or found ineligible at any stage. At that vacant seat chance will be given to reserve panel candidates.
SSC declared 5076 candidate are fair and 614 are suspect in malpractice or any other illigal activity during exam so 614 kept withheld.
5076 candidate joined and SSC investigate 614 withheld candidate.
after investigation SSC Declare out of 614 candidate 125 candidates are fair and 489 candidate are found malpractice and keep again withheld.
125 candidate joined and file of 489 malpractice candidate handover to Delhi Police Crime branch .
Delhi police crime branch investigate 489 withheld candidates CCTV footage and computer server and found they do 50questions in 2 minutes 25 maths question in 3 minutes and surprise is that all questions are right DP Crime branch send notice to these 489 candidates and these candidates accept their fraud
According to notification any vacant seat out of 5690 by any reason ( like candidate resign , candidate death during training , not join , find ineligible ) 10% Reserve panel candidates can claim these vacant seats
My question is that
According to SSC their is no any rule or procedure to fill the vacant seat of withheld candidate who found malpractice
but according to notification it's reserve panel right to claim that seat
can we file a case in CAT Delhi to claim these seats against DP and SSC
PLEASE reply sir
Due to my English you confuse at any point you can mail me it's an humble request sir
jayant442263@gmail.com
kavksatyanarayana
(Expert) 03 September 2022
A repeated query. This query was already replied to.
Jayant
(Querist) 03 September 2022
no sir... it's well explained question.. in previous question their were only confusion
Dr J C Vashista
(Expert) 05 September 2022
It is advisable to consult a local prudent lawyer practicing service matters or contact me, if you feel so.
P. Venu
(Expert) 09 September 2022
Still, the facts are confused. Anyhow, there is nothing that prevents a candidate for public appointment in seeking judicial review.
